Bulmat

RT @CryptoBoomNews: 30 year old me trying to start dancing on TikTok because crypto didn’t work out

@contextor 오 이름이랑 프로필 다 바껴서 몰라뵐뻔. 저도 팬입니다..

@itsbulmat 팬이에요

New technology never reduces the amount of work It raises expectations

@MoneyStack9 ㅋㅋ 크립또는 죽었따..

@itsbulmat 살아잇엇구나 당신..

@nikitabier thanks

We are revising our developer API policies: We will no longer allow apps that reward users for posting on X (aka “infofi”). This has led to a tremendous amount of AI slop & reply spam on the platform. We have revoked API access from these apps, so your X experience should start improving soon (once the bots realize they’re not getting paid anymore). If your developer account was terminated, please reach out and we will assist in transitioning your business to Threads and Bluesky.

New on our Frontier Red Team blog: We tested whether AIs can exploit blockchain smart contracts. In simulated testing, AI agents found $4.6M in exploits. The research (with @MATSprogram and the Anthropic Fellows program) also developed a new benchmark: red.anthropic.com/2025/smart-con…

RT @arena: 🚨Text Leaderboard Update @xAI’s Grok 4.1 (thinking) and Grok 4.1 have scaled new heights in the most competitive Text Arena: 🔹G…

After seven years, it's time to say goodbye.

지금 세대는 투자할 때마다 ‘내가 잘못된 건가?’ 라고 생각하는데 사실 잘못된 건 환경임 - 머니 프린팅으로 벼락부자 된 사람들 보며 상대적 박탈감 느낌. 이때문에 투자 성향의 영점이 공격형에 맞추어짐 - 투자로 포장된 투기 쓰레기 상품에 24시간 노출되어 있음. 크립토, 밈주식 등 - AI가 노동의 가치를 실시간으로 0까지 깎아내리는 중. 전통적인 방법으로 자산을 쌓을 시간 얼마 안 남았음. 조바심 한스푼 추가 - SNS, 인터넷 발달로 부자 생활 엿보기 가능. 상대적 박탈감에 24시간 노출 - 인터넷 상에서 만들어진 성공 스토리 필터링 사실상 불가능. 허상이랑 진짜가 구분이 어려워짐 - 예전에는 꾸준히 부가가치를 창출하는 자산을 구매하는 게 곧 투자였는데, 이젠 법화가 미친듯이 찍혀 나오고 있어 법화 가치는 박살나고, 구매력 보존까지 생각해야함. 더이상 투자가 투자가 아님 - 여태껏 익숙하게 누렸던 글로벌 공급망 수혜 사라지기 시작함. 물가 상승으로 구매력은 한 번 더 박살 - 수십 년에 걸쳤던 장기 부채 사이클이 노년기에 접어들며 부채 문제로 글로벌 경제 흔들림. 법화 가치 또 박살. 월급 구매력 박살

Introducing LlamaAI. Turn a single prompt into deep analysis, original charts, and real insights. Now available to DefiLlama Pro subscribers.

UPDATE: MACHI BIG BROTHER HAS BEEN FULLY LIQUIDATED He has now gone from +$44.5M PnL to -$10M PnL on this account.

ATOM touched 0.001 💀

what the hell was that I kept hitting that buy button nonstop but shitnance was down forever damn it

Kinda wild to see that TardFi looked down on crypto for almost a decade and now they're doing everything they can to become exactly like crypto. Start sliding the leverage bar boomers, and no crying at the casino.

Good company, but higher @PlayPudgyParty $PENGU

Oh Korea, you just got cuter @PenguAsia

@gainzy222 🤣🤣

kaito is fking retarded yappers are fking retarded -ev drivel making this space more retarded

@abhitejxyz ꧁ yeah nobody would back such founders in crypto ꧂

I don’t understand all the hate for JZ - he’s a legend. An inspiration for many founders to come. Would you rather back a founder who: - Builds a product - Defers raising large capital until there’s traction - Launches, gains real traction without incentives - Hits a setback but keeps going, even putting in his own capital - Makes sure retail users affected are made whole - Finds another pain point and ships an MVP within two months Are you crazy? That would be the end of this industry. We simply need more JZ(s) to keep growing.

@clairekart 🤔

I don’t know Jason, or the details of his departure, but as someone who has helped a handful of high profile founders navigate their departures, this reads VERY differently to me than how most are interpreting it. Things that immediately piqued my curiosity: - it’s vague and seems rushed - ill defined “advisor” position softening the landing - investors and employees not saying anything outside of a few generic replies - no statement from the new leadership - no comms from the brand account on the leadership transition - cofounder who is now in charge offering a polite, but somewhat vague, reply - plan to work on something related within the ecosystem Again, this is pure speculation, but I think most experienced comms ppl are reading btw the lines and coming to a very different conclusion than the rest of CT