Ivan Hewett

7.5K posts

Ivan Hewett

Ivan Hewett

@ivanhewett

I write on music and other things. I like to think my opinions are my own.

London, mostly Katılım Mart 2012
395 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler
Zoe Gardner
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere·
Horrifying to hear of another antisemitic attack on ambulances in Golders Green last night We are being dangerously divided against one another like no time I can remember. Saturday there’ll be a huge march against hate, for the country we need where we stand TOGETHER #r4today
Zoe Gardner tweet media
English
494
177
601
111.1K
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
With every week that passes you sound more and more absurd. Do you think the terrorists that did this had to be encouraged? That without the ‘far right’ ‘stoking division’ they would be embracing Jews as their brothers?
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere

We don’t know who did it, but guys, it doesn’t have to be perpetrated by the far right to be a good reminder of the need for us all, from all communities to stand together against racist hate that seeks to divide us - more than anything by seeking to pit Muslims against Jews.

English
0
0
2
79
Culture Explorer
Culture Explorer@CultureExploreX·
You do not honor other cultures by weakening your own. You honor them by standing firmly in what is yours. Shakespeare is not a symbol of domination. He is one of the clearest expressions of what human language can reach at its highest level. His work survived because generation after generation, across cultures, found truth in it. What they are calling decolonising is diluting something rooted, tested, and refined over centuries. This is what happens when a civilization loses confidence in its own inheritance. The idea that Shakespeare being universal is harmful reveals something deeper. It suggests that greatness itself has become suspect. That if something endures across time and place, it must be explained away, not studied. That instinct erases standards. Tradition is not exclusion. It is memory. It is the record of what a civilization discovered was worth preserving. Once you start apologizing for that, you create a vacuum where nothing holds. A culture that cannot defend Shakespeare will not be able to defend anything else that made it.
Culture Explorer tweet media
English
205
1.2K
4.6K
120.6K
jeremydenk
jeremydenk@jeremydenk·
@ivanhewett we should definitely resist the many forces that try to eat our democracies, and one of them is bigotry, aided and abetted by religion, another is money …
English
1
0
0
42
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
This is disingenuous. Christianity’s abominable arrogance is all in the past. Christians don’t now go around threatening to levy a tax on or even kill people who refuse to convert, or declare apostates should be killed. But you know this already.
stellacreasy@stellacreasy

No one instructed me to do anything nick. My conscience sees a man seeking to foster division and hatred against a religious minority and calls it out because it’s wrong and dangerous. If you think Islam is unique in demanding one god alone be worshipped, the Ten Commandments will blow your mind….

English
2
1
9
617
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
@jeremydenk well fine so we have to resist both anti-democratic tendencies, right? Not make excuses for one of them, on the grounds that we really must be ‘inclusive’, not give way to ‘bigotry’ or ‘hate’, or all the other boo-words leftists like to throw at anyone who disagrees with them?
English
1
0
0
26
jeremydenk
jeremydenk@jeremydenk·
@ivanhewett I just think that’s not an argument given the anti democratic tendencies of American evangelism for instance
English
1
0
0
37
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
@jeremydenk I think we come at this issue from different angles Jeremy. From a British perspective thinking of right-wing Christianity as an equal threat to liberal democracy as Islamism just seems absurd.
English
1
0
0
27
jeremydenk
jeremydenk@jeremydenk·
@ivanhewett They harass gays on other streets they advocate death to the east and plot world domination (look up dominionism)
English
1
0
0
44
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
@jeremydenk now I think about it - isn’t this just ‘whataboutery’? Ugandan fundamentalist Christians don’t feature largely on MI5’s terrorist watchlist. They don’t harrass gays on London streets, advocate Death to the West, and plot world domination.
English
1
0
0
30
jeremydenk
jeremydenk@jeremydenk·
@ivanhewett Christians actually do levy taxes and punishments on non observers
English
1
0
1
53
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
@jeremydenk the trouble with X is these replies come winging in, to who knows which idle remark.
English
1
0
0
51
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
@PriyamvadaGopal what an astonishingly fatuous remark. Were the black slaves in America who wanted to throw off white domination deeply committed to domination themselves? And what’s the relevance of the 40 chapels in Cambridge?
English
0
0
0
32
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
I feel the problem with the apologists for public praying and the ‘diversity is our strength’ crowd is they have no imagination. They’re sweetly reasonable people, and they assume hardline Muslims are deep down just the same as themselves, but with beards and unusual clothes.
English
2
0
6
158
Ivan Hewett
Ivan Hewett@ivanhewett·
the good news about AI just keeps coming!
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone. And it's making you a worse person because of it. Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would. That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear. It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on. Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one. The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started. Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product. This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens. Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing. You're right. They're wrong. Even when the opposite is true.

English
0
0
1
207