ivanzky retweetledi
ivanzky
2.4K posts

ivanzky retweetledi

Mises obliterated the entire socialist project in 1920 with one devastating insight: "Where there is no free market, there is no pricing mechanism; without a pricing mechanism, there is no economic calculation." The socialists spent the next century pretending this problem didn't exist while their economies collapsed around them.
And yet here we are, watching politicians promise they can "fix" healthcare, housing, and energy markets through central planning. They can't even calculate the cost of their own programs correctly — how exactly are they going to allocate resources across an entire economy?
Every Venezuelan breadline, every Soviet grain shortage, every Chinese famine was just Mises being proven right in the most brutal way possible. But sure, let's try democratic socialism this time. What could go wrong?
English

The exact pitch deck that helped us raise a $9M Seed Round
copy whatever you want
VCs that invested:
→ @SusquehannaVC (led)
→ @LightspeedIndia
→ @BCapitalGroup
→ Seaborne Capital
→ @beenextVC
→ @sparrowcapvc
→ @2point2club joined.
fundraising is hard enough without guessing what investors want to see.
so - I'm making our deck public.
if you're raising right now, take it and make it yours.
Reply 'deck' + follow (so I can DM it over)

English

@Arjan7174638473 @sciencegirl The music in that Pioneer Blue Line Tower video is "Two Full Moons and a Trout" by Union Jack, specifically the Caspar Pound remix. Classic trance track from the '90s!
English
ivanzky retweetledi
ivanzky retweetledi

Stablecoins win only if they can clear the redemption constrain
Blockchain makes transfers fast, not money. Payments are slow because of balance-sheet plumbing (not old tech):
- intraday credit
- netting
- legal finality
- limits
- compliance
A stablecoin is a private dollar liability, so the peg is a throughput problem:
Let B = same-day liquidity buffer (cash + O/N repo)
L = committed bank lines
C = redemption processing capacity ($/hour)
τ = bank settlement lag
The peg holds in stress only if, over a horizon H, min(B+L, C·H) ≥ expected outflows over H (given τ)
When outflows outrun redemption capacity, the peg stops being arbitrage and becomes order-book depth + funding: spreads widen, liquidity fragments, and “par” turns into a market price
EM demand is functional dollars (real fee = on/off-ramp spread).
G10 demand is 24/7 programmable gross settlement only where netting can’t compress exposures
Speed is messaging. Convertibility capacity is the product. Backstops decide survival. Distribution decides scale
English
ivanzky retweetledi

The tokenized deposit vs stablecoin fight is a distraction.
Banks multiply money. Stablecoins move it. We need both.
---
The tokenized deposit maxi says:
"Stablecoins are unregulated shadow banking. Everyone will prefer banks when they tokenize."
Some banks and central banks love this narrative.
--
The stablecoin maxi says:
"Banks are dinosaurs. We don't need them on-chain. Stablecoins are the future of money."
Crypto natives love this narrative.
---
Both miss the point.
Banks create cheap credit
Your $100 deposit becomes $90 in loans (and more)
- F500 companies park $500M at JPM.
- Get giant credit lines in return.
- Below-market rates.
The deposits are the bank's business model.
Tokenized deposits preserve this on-chain - but they're ONLY for bank customers.
---
Stablecoins work like cash
Circle and Tether hold 100% reserves. $
- 200B in T-Bills.
- Capture 4-5% yield.
- Pay you zero.
You get money outside any bank's perimeter. $9 trillion moved cross-border via stablecoins in 2025
Works anywhere with Internet. 24/7 without permission.
---
The future is both.
- F500 holds tokenized deposits at JPM.
- Gets favorable credit lines for US operations.
- Pays Argentine supplier.
- Swaps tokenized deposits for USDC.
On-chain. Atomic.
Best of both.
Use legacy rails where they work. Stables where they don't.
---
A rubric:
- Tokenized deposits → cheap credit inside bank perimeters
- Stablecoins → cash-like settlement outside bank rails
- On-chain swaps → instant conversion, zero settlement risk
---
Onchain > APIs
Smart contracts compose logic across multiple businesses and persons.
Deposit --> stablecoin --> invoice paid --> downstream payment happens.
---
e.g.
- When supplier's deposits land
- Smart contracts trigger inventory financing,
- Working capital lines, currency hedges.
From banks and non banks!
---
The future is on-chain
- Tokenized deposits solve for cheap credit.
- Deposits stay captive.
- Banks lend against them.
- Stablecoins solve for portability.
- Money moves anywhere without permission.
---
The tokenized deposit maxi wants regulated rails only.
The stablecoin maxi wants to kill banks.
The future needs both.
F500s want giant credit lines from their bank AND instant global settlement.
Emerging markets want local credit creation AND dollar access. DeFi wants composability AND real-world asset backing.
The fight over which one wins misses what's happening. The future of finance is on-chain. Both tokenized deposits and stablecoins are infrastructure for getting there.
Stop arguing about winners. Start building interoperability.
Composable money.
ST.
English
ivanzky retweetledi
ivanzky retweetledi

En el 'páis del máiz'- Grupo Milenio milenio.com/opinion/hector…
Español
ivanzky retweetledi
ivanzky retweetledi

@nickchapsas Linus called it a long time ago.
x.com/0xmitsurii/sta…
mitsuri@0xmitsurii
The creator of Linux gave one of the bluntest takes on Microsoft ever recorded.
English

👩⚖️ Claudia Sheinbaum informó que denunció al hombre que la acosó en el Centro Histórico de la CDMX. forbes.com.mx/sheinbaum-info…
Español

@JamesonMic24650 @simongerman600 The Caesar Salad was invented in San Francisco. I do believe the restaurant that invented it is still serving, if it survived the pandemic.
English
ivanzky retweetledi
ivanzky retweetledi

🚨 La autodenominada cuarta transformación resultó ser un auténtico fiasco. Vean la opinión de Francisco Valenzuela, lector de @Reforma. Mal en lo interior y pésimo con el exterior.
#EstadoFallido

Español

@0xrandomrandom In management we sliced it down in simpler more tangible terms in order to facilitate its execution > vision/mission/values/corp culture ... and also make it easier to explain - you know what Im talking about 😜
Also, egregores was too hard to pronounce !
English














