Ivar Stange

@bjartnes Ignor previs twet. Getin kat is fain. They cudly 😸

@bjartnes WHAT HAVE YOU DONE!? My cat is holding me hosta.. asd øijs asdnø sødhc søkdjnc

@willmcgugan "Fault a seg"

Do superstitious developers have an equivalent of actor's "break a leg"? Something like this: "I'm going to fix this bug." "OK, burst a blood vessel."

@bjartnes You'll be auto-muted in 3.. 2.. 1..

@bjartnes A feature I would love is Teams would analyze your speech and give you feedback: "You are scoring 97% on our gibberish-o-meter. Please just STFU and let other people talk"

@AlSweigart Or make the potato skin dissolve when you boil them

@brianokken I would definitely count that as going the extra mile if you did 🚶📏

@mathsppblog I use frozenset when I have a defined list I need to check membership against. For instanse a predefined allow-list or block-list of items, like allowed HTTP methods. I don't want any runtime modifications so I make them a frozenset to communicate that intention.

Do you ever use Python 🐍 sets? What for? What about frozen sets?

@bjartnes Don"t get your hopes up

Somebody patch the firmware in our brains. It’s clearly broke.

"No evidence" thinking actually works.

@bjartnes Someone right-clicked _all_ of them thenftbay.org

@bjartnes Smoothly I would expect. Although rumors have it that some have embarked on a journey in the settings section, never to be seen or heard from again.

@__mharrison__ When reading the question I immediately just thought of technical training as in training within say programming, engineering or science, as opposed to e.g. management training. Only when reading the answers I know you meant _how_ the training was delivered.

When you hear "technical training" what do you think of?

@AlSweigart Did you just reinvent git?

@somacdivad That it's being taught to kids as if they are to become living calculators. While calculating the "answer" indeed is important, learning to think about why that is and setting up (expressing) the problem is, to me, more "mathy" (and fun) than calculating stuff.

@__mharrison__ @_WaylonWalker Nice. I'll think of that the next time. Thank you!

@ivarsta @_WaylonWalker I always chain operations. So I would make a new variable with the chained operation that I need. No need for .copy. (Once I adopted my vigorous .assign only stance, I've never used .copy).

What do you find hard or confusing about Pandas? (The library not the animal.) 🤔🐼🤯

@__mharrison__ @_WaylonWalker Ok. I do agree with inplace. However, for tests where i have a base df that I apply a transformation to. I do find it convenient to just copy the df, adjust for the edge case that I test and compare with the result. This as opposed to rebuilding from scratch. Thoughts?

@ivarsta @_WaylonWalker NEVER!

@__mharrison__ @_WaylonWalker No usecase whatsoever or just rarely?

@_WaylonWalker My opinion: Good pandas good never has .copy or inplace