jackhand

5.7K posts

jackhand

jackhand

@jackhand

I am a computer engineer currently working on the Roku platform.

New Jersey Katılım Kasım 2008
186 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler
jackhand retweetledi
Echoes of War
Echoes of War@EchoesofWarYT·
In June 1775, the British military governor of Massachusetts offered a full pardon to every American rebel who would lay down arms. He named two exceptions. Samuel Adams was one of them. By that point Adams had spent over a decade engineering the destruction of British rule in America, and the Crown wanted him hanged for treason. He was 52 years old, broke, often dressed in clothes his friends had quietly bought him, and shook with a tremor so bad he could barely sign his name. He was also the most dangerous man in the empire. Sam Adams was born in Boston in 1722, thirteen years before his more famous cousin John. He entered Harvard at 14 and wrote his master's thesis on whether it was lawful to resist the supreme magistrate "if the commonwealth cannot otherwise be preserved." He argued yes. He was 20. He would spend the rest of his life proving it. He was terrible at business. He inherited his father's malt house and ran it into the ground. He tried merchant trading and failed. The town of Boston eventually made him tax collector, possibly as charity, and he proceeded to not collect taxes from people who couldn't afford them. He ended up personally owing the town thousands of pounds, an enormous debt for the time. Boston never made him pay it back. Voters loved him for it. In 1764, when Parliament passed the Sugar Act, Adams wrote one of the first major American arguments that taxation without representation was unconstitutional. When the Stamp Act followed in 1765, he organized the Boston resistance, helped grow the Sons of Liberty, and pioneered something new in politics: he turned the Boston town meeting into a weapon, a place where ordinary tradesmen voted on questions of empire. He wrote constantly. Under more than 25 different pseudonyms, Vindex, Candidus, Determinatus, Populus, and on and on, he flooded Boston newspapers with essays attacking British policy. Loyalists complained that fishermen and dockworkers were now debating constitutional theory in taverns. That was Sam Adams's doing. After the Boston Massacre in 1770, he stood in front of the royal lieutenant governor and demanded every British soldier be removed from Boston. Not some. All. The governor caved. The troops left. His younger cousin John then defended those same soldiers in court, and Sam never held it against him. They were running the same revolution from opposite ends. In 1772, Sam Adams invented the system that made the Revolution possible: the Committees of Correspondence. He organized a network of patriot writers in every Massachusetts town who exchanged letters, news, and grievances. Other colonies copied it. Within two years, an unofficial shadow government stretched from New Hampshire to Georgia, faster and better informed than the British administration trying to govern it. It was, in effect, the internet of the American Revolution, and one man designed it. Then came the tea. On December 16, 1773, after a final mass meeting at the Old South Meeting House, Sam Adams reportedly stood and said, "This meeting can do nothing more to save the country." It is widely believed to have been the signal. Within minutes, men disguised as Mohawks marched to Griffin's Wharf and threw 342 chests of British tea into Boston Harbor. Adams did not put on a costume or board the ships. He didn't need to. He had built the crowd that did. Britain responded with the Coercive Acts, shutting down the port of Boston and rewriting the Massachusetts charter. Adams used the crisis to summon the First Continental Congress. On the night of April 18, 1775, British troops marched out of Boston with two missions: seize the patriot weapons stockpiled at Concord, and capture Samuel Adams and John Hancock, who were hiding in a parsonage in Lexington. Paul Revere rode ahead to warn them. They slipped into the woods minutes before the redcoats arrived. As the first shots of the Revolutionary War cracked behind him on Lexington Green, Adams is said to have turned to Hancock and exclaimed, "What a glorious morning for America." He signed the Declaration of Independence the next year. He helped write the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780, the oldest functioning written constitution in the world, still in force today. After the war, the firebrand became an elder statesman. He opposed the new U.S. Constitution at first because it had no Bill of Rights, then supported ratification once one was promised. He served as Lieutenant Governor under John Hancock, then as Governor of Massachusetts from 1794 to 1797. He watched his younger cousin John serve as the second President of the United States while he ran the state where the whole story had started. By the end, the tremor in his hands was so severe his wife Betsy had to write his letters for him. He spent his last years quietly in Boston, in the same plain coat, in the same plain house, talking about scripture and republics. He died on October 2, 1803, in genteel poverty. His funeral procession was the largest Boston had ever seen. The brewery wasn't his. The beer is just a name. The country is the monument.
Echoes of War tweet media
English
62
471
2.3K
64.8K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@Jason Personally, I prefer privacy coins like zcash $zec
English
0
0
2
281
@jason
@jason@Jason·
I'm just not sure where the new Bitcoin buyer comes from it you have stablecoins, $tao and solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 being more interesting, valuable and easier to use 🤷 Anyone have 10x bitcoin:native thesis?
English
313
27
420
152.7K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
Just a small technical note to help with clarity on your post. The shoe photos show the J5/J6 gray hoodied bomber’s shoes first, followed by Brian Cole Jr.’s. Your description currently lists them in the reverse order. A clearer way to write it might be: “comparing the J5/J6 gray hoodied bomber’s shoe size to Brian Cole Jr.’s.” Appreciate all the work you’re doing on this. Just trying to be helpful.
English
0
0
2
226
Steve Baker
Steve Baker@SteveBakerUSA·
Here's the video from Saturday, comparing Brian Cole Jr.'s shoe size to that worn by the J5/J6 gray hoodied b*mber. (Some folks didn't realize that it's linked in the story itself.) veritasregnat.com/2026/05/21/sho…
Steve Baker tweet mediaSteve Baker tweet mediaSteve Baker tweet media
English
45
238
898
43.4K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
You're missing the point, my friend. It's not that poor people shouldn't vote. It's human nature. If half the country pays basically zero net taxes but can still vote, a ton of them will back politicians promising to tax the "rich" and middle class more to "pay their fair share." That's exactly how we slide toward more socialism over time - pitting haves against have-nots. The 3% doesn't fix the incentive problem. Zero-to-little taxes for millions + full voting power keeps the class warfare game going strong.
English
0
0
0
6
TruthBeTulled
TruthBeTulled@Tizull·
You're a clown. Our 3% is rounding error. The well of should pay more to subsidize misfortune. Especially since most of their money is on 'paper'. The federal government flushes money down the tubes and takes it right out of pockets and has nothing to show for it. Sending them more money isn't going to solve that problem.
English
1
0
0
5
@jason
@jason@Jason·
I would tax folks under $75k at 1%, so they were still tossing in half a week's paycheck… and felt like they were part of the American process. … but Jeff is correct overall, let the bottom half of earners spend their money and crank the progressive taxation system one or two more turns Also, it wouldn’t hurt anyone to increase our federal minimum wage by a meager $1 a year for seven years — didn’t do any harm in Australia, the Nordics and New Zealand Much better proposals than @RoKhanna and @BernieSanders’ wealth seizure taxes
Jeff Bezos@JeffBezos

Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.

English
308
29
1.3K
373.2K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@Tizull @Jason That is human nature. If someone tells someone who is poor/working class that the rich and middle class need to pay their "fair share", then they may be inclined to think the well-off should pay more to subsidize their misfortune. Aka Socialism/Communism.
English
1
0
0
9
TruthBeTulled
TruthBeTulled@Tizull·
@jackhand @Jason Lol. This line of thinking is pure insanity. People out here thinking they need to pay taxes to have 'skin in the game'.
English
1
0
1
8
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@jchalanick @Jason Agreed. The citizen should have more power. If citizens do not like what the government is doing, then the citizen can protest by curbing their spending. The government will have less revenue and will be forced to cut things from the budget.
English
0
0
0
13
Noyb
Noyb@jchalanick·
@Jason Get rid of income tax and only have a consumption tax
English
1
0
3
59
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@Todd_Pierce04 @Jason It's not a loophole when the law was made to allow this to happen. This may sound like an argument in semantics, but it isn't. You're blaming the rich guy for following the rules instead of the lawmakers who purposely made those rules.
English
0
0
1
19
Todd pierce
Todd pierce@Todd_Pierce04·
@Jason Isnt the best way to solve this to not let people worth 500 billion on paper borrow against that tax free and live like they have 500 billion in bank? Just close the loopholes. If bezos wants to spend billions every year sell some Amazon stock get taxed on it like rest of us.
English
2
1
6
363
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
Personally, I believe progressive income taxes pit citizens against each other instead of against the government - where the real tension belongs. Scrap the income tax. Replace it with a consumption tax that exempts essentials like food. The more you spend, the more you pay. Disagree with government spending? Vote with your wallet by not spending. Citizens should hold more power, not less. Checks and balances!
English
1
0
2
23
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
A really important and interesting interview with @JeffBezos and @andrewrsorkin about tax policy, AI, the economy, and space. Unfortunately it is only in audio form. Bezos argues for eliminating tax on the bottom 50%, making the case that the 3% of tax revenue from this cohort should be made up for by eliminating government waste and fraud. I agree. He says that instead of vilifying the top 1% who pay 40% of Federal taxes, we should have a real debate about tax policy. Is making the tax system even more progressive the right answer? Will it generate more revenues or less? Or should we endeavor to eliminate waste and shrink the size of government in order to eliminate tax on an even greater percentage of Americans? On AI, he makes a powerful case for more jobs, in fact a labor shortage, due to growth driven by increases in AI-driven productivity. A must listen. The interview begins at 18:33. youtu.be/NSVpd46EfLo?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
254
320
2.6K
389.9K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@JeffBezos Agreed. Stop nickel-and-diming workers. But net takers shouldn’t be able to vote. They shouldn't vote themselves more from net givers. Skin in the game matters. We all need to be in this together and not pitted against each other. Those who fund society should direct it.
English
0
0
4
243
Jeff Bezos
Jeff Bezos@JeffBezos·
Thank you. The important part is zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. Best way to put money in someone’s pocket is to not take it out in the first place. Bottom half is only 3% of total tax revenue. But it’s very meaningful to that person. Zero it out.
Chris | Venture X Media@thecoachchris_

Facts It's great that Jeff Bezos thinks this way, because too many people who don't make money think that giving money to the government will solve a lot of their problems. They think these government programs are the answer, and it's clearly not. You can look at the federal level or at the state level, and you will see that a lot of government programs are simply waste.

English
3.3K
5.4K
54.5K
8.5M
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@elonmusk I would but I'm still waiting for my HW3 2020 Model Y to get the upgrade.
English
1
2
9
130
jackhand retweetledi
The Babylon Bee
The Babylon Bee@TheBabylonBee·
Study: Average Father Spends 97% Of Time Running Around House Turning Lights Off buff.ly/Ido2NzH
The Babylon Bee tweet media
English
66
138
2.2K
108.4K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@Jason This is only for iPhones for now.
English
0
0
4
182
@jason
@jason@Jason·
This new Grok menu is 🔥 who came up with this banger? Keep going!
@jason tweet media
English
254
108
1.6K
13.3M
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@bennyjohnson If people are upset that the President may be profiting from insider knowledge as a public servant, they should demand their reps pass a law banning it. The law must apply to all public officials, including the President and members of Congress who write it. No exceptions.
English
0
1
10
227
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
MASTERCLASS: JD Vance systematically DISMANTLES a fake news propagandist from The White House podium for his monologue masquerading as a question. Perfect response 🔥
English
128
483
4.5K
90.1K
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
Women earning 62% of all degrees. Is this “equity”?
Mike Lee tweet media
English
694
433
3.7K
1.8M
jackhand retweetledi
Stephen Limbaugh
Stephen Limbaugh@StephenLimbaugh·
>Option incredible stories/scripts discarded by Hollywood/Londonstan cause of bias. >Actors/directors/crew/etc will work, basically all of them, so long as they’re paid. >Release minimum time in theaters to qualify for awards. >Stream exclusivity on X. 👏🏻NO👏🏻OTHER👏🏻DISTRO👏🏻
joshua steinman (🇺🇸,🇺🇸)@JoshuaSteinman

It’s time for X Studios. A full scope entertainment company using cutting edge technology to create full length features for X and elsewhere. I hear @AmandaMilius is available.

English
3
5
34
14.6K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@OwenGregorian Is this a case of "reverse science"? 'Gardening makes old people live longer.' Or is it really that healthy, old people who can still garden at 79 do it, but the frail cannot?
English
0
0
1
12
Owen Gregorian
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian·
Engaging in gardening is associated with better well-being in older adulthood | Vladimir Hedrih, PsyPost An analysis of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 data found that older adults who engage in gardening more often tend to experience better psychological well-being, stronger physical function, and a 22% lower risk of death. Longitudinally, more frequent gardening was associated with slower declines in gait speed and a slower progression of cellular indicators of aging between ages 79 and 90. Comparing median values, frequent gardeners lived over a year longer than their peers not engaged in gardening. The paper was published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology. In modern times, people live longer than ever before, and as a result, the global population of older adults is increasing rapidly. Some estimates state that by 2030, one in six people worldwide will be aged 60 or over, and this number is expected to increase to over 2.1 billion people by 2050. Because of this, supporting healthy aging has become an urgent public priority. Healthy aging means growing older while maintaining as much physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being as possible. The goal is not simply to live longer, but to live better. It does not mean avoiding all illness, because health problems naturally become more common with age. Instead, it means preserving function, independence, dignity, and quality of life for as long as possible. Study author Janie Corley and her colleagues investigated whether gardening frequency is associated with baseline levels and long-term trajectories of a broad set of aging markers—psychological wellbeing, physical function, biological aging, and mortality risk. They analyzed data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921, a Scottish research cohort made up of people who were born in 1921 and who mostly lived in the Lothian region of Scotland, around Edinburgh. It is one of the longest-running longitudinal studies in the world, following individuals from early old age into their 90s with repeated health assessments. When the participants of this study were 11 years old, they took a national intelligence assessment (the Scottish Mental Survey of 1932). Since then, they have been re-tested several times, primarily throughout their old age. This particular analysis established a baseline using data collected from 1999 to 2001, when the study participants were approximately 79 years old. The researchers then tracked these individuals over the following 11 years (with follow-ups at ages 83, 87, and 90) to measure physical and biological decline, and tracked their mortality data for 25 years. After excluding participants for whom gardening data was not available, the baseline sample consisted of 475 individuals. At the start of the study, participants were asked how often they engaged in gardening as part of a broader lifestyle questionnaire. Study participants also completed assessments of their quality of life (the WHOQOL-BREF) and psychological wellbeing (the 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Trained nurses assessed the participants’ lung function, gait speed, grip strength, and functional ability (i.e., difficulties with basic and instrumental activities of daily living, using the 9-item Townsend scale) at ages 79, 87, and 90. Indicators of biological aging used in the study were assessments of telomere length (from the participants’ peripheral blood DNA) and DNA Methylation-based PhenoAge (a biomarker of biological aging based on age-related changes to DNA molecules extracted from blood samples). The study authors also tracked the mortality of the study participants up to 2025. By 2025, 469 of the 473 tracked participants had died; only 4 were still alive (and aged 103 years). The baseline results at age 79 showed that more frequent gardening was associated with a higher overall quality of life and better psychological wellbeing. Individuals who reported gardening more often also tended to have better indicators of physical aging at 79 years of age—better lung function, faster gait speed, stronger grip strength, and higher functional ability. Longitudinally, more frequent gardening was associated with a slower decline in gait speed over time. However, there were no associations with changes in lung function or grip strength over the years. Furthermore, participants who engaged in gardening more often tended to have longer telomeres at the start of the observation period and slower telomere attrition over time. Telomeres are protective DNA-protein caps at the ends of chromosomes. They generally shorten as cells divide, which is why they are used as biomarkers of biological aging—older individuals tend to have shorter telomeres. Slower attrition means that the frequent gardeners were biologically aging at a slower rate than the non-gardeners. Finally, a statistical model revealed that participants who engaged in frequent gardening had a 22% lower risk of death over the 25-year tracking period. Importantly, this survival advantage remained robust even after accounting for a vast array of confounding variables, including age, sex, education, social class, living alone, perceived neighborhood quality, existing diseases, and general physical activity. The fact that the benefit held up after controlling for general physical activity suggests that gardening offers unique, protective health benefits beyond simply burning calories. Overall, the median age of death for participants who never gardened was 88.4 years, while it was 89.7 years for people who reported frequently engaging in gardening—an extension of over a year. “Our results suggest that gardening may support wellbeing and longevity, with potential implications for aging in place for older adults,” the study authors concluded. The study contributes to the scientific knowledge about the associations between gardening activities and well-being in old age. However, it should be noted that the observational study design does not allow definitive causal inferences to be derived from the results. It is possible that people who engaged in gardening more frequently were simply individuals who had better health to begin with, allowing them to engage in such physical activities. While the researchers attempted to control for baseline health and activity levels, the longitudinal changes observed could still be a reflection of the underlying factors responsible for their better health status, rather than a direct consequence of gardening. psypost.org/engaging-in-ga…
Owen Gregorian tweet media
English
4
1
22
1.2K
jackhand
jackhand@jackhand·
@bennyjohnson It's hard to take Miller seriously when Massie's opponent refused to debate Massie.
English
0
1
0
36
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
Stephen Miller just massacred Massie What a brutal behind the scenes scalping
English
2.9K
4.1K
17.2K
330.3K