Jakov Miroslavić, PhD

263 posts

Jakov Miroslavić, PhD

Jakov Miroslavić, PhD

@jakovmrc

#longcovid since March 2022 | #SevereME since February 2023 | Physics | #ZeroCovid

Katılım Eylül 2022
271 Takip Edilen64 Takipçiler
Salvatore Mattera
Salvatore Mattera@SalvMattera·
@amaticahealth co-founder @JackHadfield14 publicly stated their test "does not diagnose, predict treatment response, or classify patients into clinical groups, and is not marketed as doing so." That's just not true:
English
2
3
15
1.7K
Nukit
Nukit@NukitToBeSure·
Clearly the WHO now serves the various interests of its member governments before it serves public health. I suspect it's a sort of Ford Pinto calculation. Member governments feel the possible future economic costs of death and disability are lower than the immediate and definite cost of advising public caution- and the accompanying drop in consumer spending and productivity as people stay home more. Simple misinformation is also far cheaper than infrastructure upgrades at scale. No one is going to riot or burn their city down over a cautious approach, but a cautious population is less economically active, and an inconvenienced population is more likely to be unhappy with the ruling party, so apparently nearly every country agrees their citizens must be assured by the appropriate authorities there is no reason for caution. Like all such entities, WHO prioritizes it's own existence first. They either serve the economic and political objectives of their members, or they cease to exist.
English
7
47
196
2.7K
Nele
Nele@NeleHelena·
Today in a big Belgian newspaper: a doctor divided people who can't work because of illness into three categories: objectively measurable somatic medical problems, psychological problems, and psychosomatics. Of course, he placed #MEcfs under psychosomatics. 1/2
English
8
4
62
2.3K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@FndNope Wonder if he'll comment on my post about the written-notes sign. If he ignores it while posting so many other comments thats a tact admission that its got a good point.
English
1
0
3
65
FndNope
FndNope@FndNope·
This 'anonymous neurologist' on FND Nope seems oddly furious at patients questioning their diagnosis. Textbook projection? fndnope.org/user-comments?…
English
3
0
18
610
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@pjhn22 I find it funny how his profile boasts of being platformed by various media outlets. As if they havent platformed all kinds of people (eg Monica Ghandi springs to mind)
English
0
0
2
78
pj
pj@pjhn22·
Is it me or does JW minimize illnesses so much? Why? What is up w that post saying no real immune damage? What is the purpose of minimizing? We know covid damages immune systems.
English
5
0
12
1.1K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@SalvMattera I know you're not doing this but theres a lot of psychologizing types who say "you're not getting better because you've made the disease your identity".
English
1
0
1
23
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@SalvMattera People with polio and AIDS also made that disease their identity. It motivated their activism. Dont forget FDR speaking in the US Congress about his polio /1
English
1
0
1
31
Salvatore Mattera
Salvatore Mattera@SalvMattera·
It took me a long time to figure this out, because it's socially complex and not obvious at first glance, but embedded throughout the world of chronic illness, there is this kind of lurking identity-framework that puts more emphasis on validating patients and reinforcing their identities as sick people then it does in actually solving any of the problems or helping these folks get better. This article is a great example of it. It's preemptively building the framework to make a Long COVID test irrelevant before it even exists. The author spends the first two paragraphs saying a Long COVID test would be transformative, but then spends the remaining 90% of the article explaining why a negative result shouldn't change anything. "A negative test does not mean a person is well. It means they need a different kind of attention, not less of it." That sentence makes a biomarker functionally meaningless. If a positive test confirms Long COVID and a negative test also doesn't rule it out, what does the test do? The answer is nothing. The IACC absorption is embedded throughout: "Conditions like ME, POTS, and fibromyalgia are serious illnesses... some may overlap with Long COVID, while others may have entirely different causes." The article is already building the infrastructure to ensure that when a test arrives, everyone currently in the Long COVID system stays in the system regardless of their test result. The celiac comparison is revealing but not in the way the author intends. Celiac testing improved over time and the disease definition was refined. That's how diagnostics should work: the test gets better and the diagnosis gets more precise. But this author is arguing for the opposite: that the diagnosis should remain maximally inclusive regardless of what the test shows. That's not how science should work. This kind of ideology serves the interest of the emerging Long COVID identity, but it doesn't actually serve the interest of people looking to get better.
Billy Hanlon@bhanlon15

The Sick Times: 'A test for Long COVID can’t leave anyone behind' Written by W. Michael Brode '..Brode, MD, is an internal medicine doctor and researcher in Austin, Texas, who cares for people with Long COVID...' thesicktimes.org/2026/05/08/a-t…

English
9
16
78
7K
James Throt MBBS, MD, PhD, FRCPath
@Oldboatie Exactly. And it still devastated multiple continents. “High mortality means it can’t spread” is ahistorical nonsense. The Black Death killed enormous numbers because it spread so effectively.
English
2
13
77
1.5K
James Throt MBBS, MD, PhD, FRCPath
What he fails to consider, is that SARS-CoV-2 has been damaging immune systems worldwide for 6+ years Treating historical Andes hantavirus H2H transmission patterns as immutable laws of nature rather than context-dependent observations is extremely naive Panic? No Monitor? Yes
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

Three people just died of hantavirus on a Dutch cruise ship. The strain kills nearly 40% of the people it infects. And yet no virologist on earth is panicking about a pandemic, because the reason it stays small is one of the strangest rules in disease science. The rule is simple. The deadlier a virus is, the harder it is to spread. If a virus kills you in days, you can't ride a bus, board a plane, or even leave the hospital. You're in a bed or a body bag. Either way, the virus killed its only ride. Hantavirus has been around for at least 70 years, but fewer than 1,000 Americans have ever caught it. The CDC says it kills 38% of those who do. The cruise ship strain, called Andes, kills closer to 40%. If hantavirus spread like COVID, it would kill billions. But it can't. Most hantaviruses spread only one way. You breathe in tiny dust particles from rat or mouse pee, droppings, or spit. No mice in your house, no virus. The cruise ship is the rare exception, because the Andes strain can spread between people, but it usually needs close contact like spouses sharing a bed. A Johns Hopkins virologist called Andes spread "unbelievably rare." Compare it to the viruses that scared the world. Ebola kills 60 to 90% of people, but only through bodily fluids and only late in the illness, so each patient passes it to fewer than 2 others. SARS killed 10% before being wiped out in 8 months. MERS killed 35% but never spread far beyond the Middle East. None of them became pandemics, because the spread was always too slow. Then COVID showed up. It killed about 1 in every 100 people who caught it. That is almost nothing compared to hantavirus. But COVID was mild enough that you could work for a week without knowing. You would ride the bus, hug your kid, eat lunch with a coworker, and infect four other people. It killed 7 million. Flu works the same way. Mild fever, sore throat, but you still drag yourself to school or the office. The virus walks right into the next host. Hantavirus is the opposite. Within 4 to 10 days, your lungs fill with fluid. There's no medicine that fights it and no vaccine to prevent it. The only treatment is a machine that breathes for you, and even that just cuts the death rate from 50% to 20%. Every outbreak, from 3,200 UN soldiers in the Korean War, to the 1993 Four Corners cases, to Gene Hackman's wife Betsy Arakawa last year, traces back to mice. The viruses that worry scientists are the boring ones. The ones that give you a sniffle for a week and let you walk around the city while you're contagious. Hantavirus, brutal as it is, never had the spread to do real damage.

English
5
89
446
33K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@SalvMattera Agreed. Dont forget that for TB antibiotics are also prevention. Giving someone antibiotics stops them transmission their TB to others. Same for leprosy.
English
0
0
4
171
Salvatore Mattera
Salvatore Mattera@SalvMattera·
Some Long COVID advocates think preventing COVID infections is pointless - that the ship has sailed, and it is delusional to pretend otherwise. That may be true. But if it is true, the entire Long COVID project is pointless because there is no infectious disease in history that was solved through treatment alone. HIV: Condoms, needle exchanges, PrEP, etc. Without prevention, the treatment costs would have been unsustainable. And even with effective treatment, prevention remains central because lifelong drugs for every infected person on earth isn't economically viable. Polio: The entire strategy was the vaccine. Treatment for polio was never going to solve it. Smallpox: Eradicated entirely through vaccination. No treatment was ever developed that could have managed the disease at scale. Malaria: Bed nets, insecticide, etc. Without prevention, treatment alone would be overwhelmed in endemic regions. And in fact, in areas where prevention isn't possible, it remains a major issue. Tuberculosis: Antibiotics exist but TB is still a massive global killer because prevention infrastructure is not effective in developing economies. Other non infectious examples: smoking/lung cancer: Treatment has improved survival but the single biggest factor in reducing lung cancer deaths was getting people to stop smoking. If you are for Long COVID treatment but are not interested in prevention, you are simply not a serious person, or are still in denial about the situation, or just haven't thought it through fully.
English
10
89
341
7K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
@Biff234523 @SalamonSMD Whats the evidence for this? Did they PCR test every sat in the landfill, or just circumstantial evidence of "they went to the landfill therefore got it there"
English
0
0
0
50
Biff #SARSisAirborne 🍉
Biff #SARSisAirborne 🍉@Biff234523·
We already know where it began, it was a landfill in Argentina that the deceased couple visited on a birdwatching tour in the month of March before boarding the cruise on April 1st. But Argentina hasn’t noted any additional local cases, and they’re actually on top of the ball and used to dealing with this all the time.
English
3
0
24
4K
Spela Salamon, MD, Ph.D.
Spela Salamon, MD, Ph.D.@SalamonSMD·
If the first victim of this #Hantavirus outbreak died on the 11th of april, the outbreak likely began sometime in March, or even February. If it can spread between humans, forget contact tracing. It's in your town. #MaskUp
English
69
64
468
43.5K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD@jakovmrc·
@ZacharyGrinDPT Right but if you forced the HIV pill down their throat it would have a biomedical effect. Or if they were in the trial and didnt know if they were getting the med or placebo /1
English
1
0
0
64
Zachary Grin
Zachary Grin@ZacharyGrinDPT·
People who are diagnosed with HIV but don’t accept/believe they have HIV, likely won’t take HIV medications to treat it. Same goes for FND & most conditions! If a person does not accept/believe they have FND, they won’t actually engage in the treatment.
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD@jakovmrc

@FndNope Evidence-based medicine should work even if you dont believe in it. You know how in RCTs the groups dont know whether they got the placebo or not

English
1
0
2
355
Salvatore Mattera
Salvatore Mattera@SalvMattera·
Gender bias is a real factor but it's over emphasized in the discourse because it fits neatly into the progressive framework that ME/CFS aligns with. Women's pain is objectively undertreated. Women receive less pain medication, wait longer in ERs, and are more likely to receive psychiatric diagnoses for the same symptoms as men. The psychologization from "hysteria" to "conversion disorder" to "functional" is medical misogyny. If these conditions affected men at the same rate, would they get more research funding? Probably. But gender bias alone can't explain this. Gulf War Illness affects predominantly men. They were psychologized for decades (and still are as recently as a few years ago by the PM of the UK). Agent Orange veterans were told their symptoms were stress. Male athletes with CTE were told they had depression. PTSD being ignored, etc. I think my structural argument is stronger than the gender argument: society psychologizes these conditions because acknowledging them would require acknowledging that common infections (or in the case of say, GWI and PTSD, combat) cause permanent disability. In the ME/CFS community, centering gender serves an institutional purpose. It aligns the condition with feminist and disability justice, which provides political allies, academic legitimacy, and moral authority. "Women are being dismissed by a patriarchal medical system" is a story that progressives understand and support. Sadly, "society can't afford to acknowledge that common viruses cause permanent disability" is a story that threatens everyone and has no natural political home.
Molly Myers@mollistan

@SalvMattera Because sufferers are majority female and because they couldn't understand it.

English
5
7
58
2K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD@jakovmrc·
@JamesThrot Just devil's advocate this graph is not very strong because it doesnt have data before the pandemic. Maybe the line was going up anyway
English
0
0
0
2
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD@jakovmrc·
@FndNope Evidence-based medicine should work even if you dont believe in it. You know how in RCTs the groups dont know whether they got the placebo or not
English
1
0
2
431
FndNope
FndNope@FndNope·
The #FND narrative often labels skepticism or questioning, whether it is seeking second opinions, pointing out red flags, or even posting this, as harmful. That mirrors #FaithHealing logic, where doubt itself is framed as the reason recovery fails.
English
2
5
22
563
Naomi Harvey “PhD Witch” #WearAMask
@atranscendedman There isn’t one. No tool has been developed to categorise PEM via questionnaire. One has been recently published that may be better than the rest (it certainly looks better), but it needs validation. I cannot remember which paper it was but I’m sure @elle_carnitine will know.
English
2
0
6
208
Naomi Harvey “PhD Witch” #WearAMask
I can’t stress enough how bad this is. “PEM” is being counted in Long Covid studies with a single question asking if you get worse symptoms after minor exertion. That’s not what PEM is!!! So of all those people labelled with PEM many won’t actually have it.
ME/CFS Science@mecfsskeptic

@Naomi_D_Harvey @domsalisbury Thanks. The study they cite (Thaweethai et al. 2023) is from RECOVER and seems to have used a single question if I understood correctly. jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…

English
26
87
311
28.6K
Nina Wildflower
Nina Wildflower@Ninawildflower·
If you follow me, it's probably because I followed you first, and you followed back. So I know you are active. But give a shout if you know that #CovidIsNotOver
Nina Wildflower tweet media
Nikita Bier@nikitabier

@BillyM2k The reason I’m interested in doing this because people overestimate how many of the followers are still active, especially if they grew in a prior era (e.g., COVID, etc)

English
168
168
1.8K
27.1K
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD
Jakov Miroslavić, PhD@jakovmrc·
@FndNope One of these rule-in signs is that the patient shows up with a written list of their symptoms
English
1
0
2
42
FndNope
FndNope@FndNope·
The only real "advancement" was the introduction of "rule-in" signs, but that is basically just rearranging the furniture. Note that I didn't visibly cherry-pick anything in that tweet, but that is a common tactic by the likes of Kim and others who gatekeep and aren't interested in actual discussion.
KimH@KH118118

More of a red flag to be cherry picking the archives and ignoring the fact that there has been advancement in Functional Neurological Disorder in the last “21 years” 🙄 #FND

English
5
0
10
621