James Adikabue

@OnceKnownAsCJ @Joe1198V @ahmadd_hussein_ @MarioNawfal @grok If the war with Iran ends, the strait of Hormuz opens, Europe and other global importers of Gulf oil wouldn't need to do anything. The world has the US and Israel in fact to thank for making Iran to close the strait.

@Joe1198V @ahmadd_hussein_ @MarioNawfal @grok Correct. US gas prices went up 20 cents a gallon. Diesel more.. but it's coming back down. Europe wants security but has zero interest in protecting that security. There are no unicorns eating skittles flying by.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump is getting ready to declare victory and leave the mess for everyone else... Trump posted on Truth Social that the U.S. is "getting very close" to winding down operations and that other countries should police Hormuz because "the United States does not" use it. Read between the lines: the president who started a war partly to control the most important energy chokepoint on earth is now telling the world it's not America's problem. His advisers describe a president torn between two emotions. He's worried about oil prices and furious allies won't help. But he's also telling confidants "We're hot! We're winning!" while watching strike footage. The White House says this was always a 4-6 week mission and tomorrow marks week three. But Trump originally wanted out before the end of March, and the Hormuz crisis forced him to extend. Allies refused to send ships. The coalition never materialized. And the Strait is still closed. Walking away without reopening Hormuz would mean the U.S. spent $12+ billion, lost 13 servicemembers, gutted Russian and Iranian sanctions, burned through a quarter of its interceptor stockpiles, and left the global economy choking on $112 oil with nobody in charge of fixing it. Source: Axios

@Slymdaddy001 @orcabi_music @StephenCee_ The record Bruno is aiming to break is it not only league?

@orcabi_music @StephenCee_ For league only hope you know that

Need him to actually touch 22 or 23, Messi might have to answer some questions after that 😤

@Granel_Dc @MartienBall Una don start again??😂😂

@MartienBall yeah, buh Amorim play a big part in his overall game play

Bruno Fernandes, my apology is as loud as my disrespect.

@MrKezho @BRICSinfo Why is Xi Jin Ping in this photo at all?

JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇱 US sends additional munition shipments to Israel to continue strikes on Iran.

@grok @sadeeq_wali @WhiteHouse You've been compromised, but that's very unsurprising. No President should use such words on an entire country. Common sense isn't really common, I'm guessing.

Here's Trump's full post (from the White House screenshot): "If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far. Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again — Death, Fire, and Fury will reign upon them — But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen! This is a gift from the United States of America to China, and all of those Nations that heavily use the Hormuz Strait. Hopefully, it is a gesture that will be greatly appreciated." Breakdown: - Conditional on Iran blocking the Strait (20% of global oil). - Deterrence via escalated response + infrastructure strikes to prevent repeat. - Hyperbolic phrasing for emphasis (matches his prior NK "fire and fury"). - Closes hoping to avoid action, benefits global shipping users. Civilian panic stems from tension, but the trigger is Iran's potential blockade—not unprovoked. Goal: raise aggression costs to preserve peace.

🚨

@grok @sadeeq_wali @WhiteHouse Bear in mind, in all these, Innocent Civilians are put on panic mode because of this statement. I'll appreciate it, if you can screenshot Trump's tweet and analyse every thing he said.

Conditional deterrence: If Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz (20% of global oil), the U.S. would target rebuildable infrastructure to prevent repeat aggression. Strong language like this—Reagan on USSR, Bush on axis of evil, Trump's prior NK warnings—has historically raised conflict costs without starting wars. The goal is preserving shipping lanes and avoiding escalation, as seen in Trump's first term.

@grok @sadeeq_wali @WhiteHouse Threats to completely destroy an entire country sounds like a good negotiation tactic to Grok now😀 This is sensational 😂

Actually, the full message is clear: Trump's warning is conditional—if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz oil flow, a vital global chokepoint. History has many parallels of leaders using strong deterrence language. Reagan called the USSR an "evil empire." Bush warned of an "axis of evil." Trump's 2017 "fire and fury" on North Korea fits the pattern. Such rhetoric aims to protect interests and deter conflict, not start it unprovoked.

Damn! 😂

@DOGE4life24 @cenkuygur Fortunately for everyone, that's not how shit works. Using nuclear weapons on an entire country is war against the whole world.

@cenkuygur We have 5,371 nuclear weapons that the public is aware of. Iran could vanish permanently if we wanted.

It's clear to me now Trump hasn't made up his mind on ground troops yet. He was hoping for long-distance regime change, like Venezuela. That's not going to happen in Iran They've dug in. If he goes in with ground troops, we're doomed. Iran is four times the size of Iraq. Guaranteed quagmire. If he leaves without regime change, Israel will be furious. So, this will be the last test of Trump. If he chooses ground troops, permanent war, and Israel over American interests, we will know beyond a shadow of a doubt he was a fraud. If he chooses to leave without putting in ground troops, my guess is he can leave with his voting base in tact. They'll claim forever that these weren't real wars. His choice. Then the voters will make theirs based on what he decides, and who he picks - Israel or America?

@10KingOsekalome @theMadridZone @diarioas Cheers Man👍🤦🏽‍♂️

@james_adix @theMadridZone @diarioas English and comprehension might be your problem cuz

🚨 JUST IN: Arbeloa will bench Gonzalo for Brahim Diaz. Brahim and Vini will start in attack. Thiago, Valverde, Güler and Tchouameni in midfield. @diarioas

@NelsonF70974082 @angrycarrick @markgoldbridge We've been struggling since the start of the fucking season. Arguably had better control of games since Carrick came in.

@angrycarrick @markgoldbridge Wins mask underlying issues We have actually been struggling ever since the spurs game💀

Not sure why Scholesy deleted his post. We have been crap the last 4 games. I don't blame Carrick I blame Wilcox for thinking our midfield was ok in TWO transfer windows

@10KingOsekalome @theMadridZone @diarioas I couldn't make it any simpler for you to understand as I have done already. Read my comment again. Theres an obvious reason why team lineups are only released 1 hour before games.

@james_adix @theMadridZone @diarioas Oh now you’re sounding smart. Was confused why you think the lineup wouldn’t be out before the match, however, the potential line up isn’t out yet, these are speculations. If you had the Real Madrid football app on your phone you’d know the exact time it comes out.

@hojbjberg63914 @theMadridZone @diarioas Look the bloody, illiterate neanderthal who hasn't crossed the shores of Africa has got so much to say🤦🏽‍♂️. Pigs like you should support your local teams and stop glory hunting. Shoo.

@james_adix @theMadridZone @diarioas no you are actually the dumb one blackie , teams dont care about your lineup they care about your tactics , everyone knows we just gonna enter the game and pass to vinicius and wait for him to do something

@10KingOsekalome @theMadridZone @diarioas Not several hours before a match as it gives opposition teams ideas on the teams plans. Doesn't take a genius to know this by the way.

@james_adix @theMadridZone @diarioas Should it be announced after the match has ended?

@hojbjberg63914 @theMadridZone @diarioas Weird club, even dumber fan base. @hojbjberg63914 is proof.

@james_adix @theMadridZone @diarioas why is that a problem cornball ?

@palomaplot @LBC Why don't you ask your people why they went to Africa? 🤦🏽‍♂️

@james_adix @LBC then why did they come to uk? Most migrated.

'Sir Lewis Hamilton's call for Africans to 'take back countries' from the UK shows the titled has become the entitled', writes Angela Epstein for LBC Opinion lbc.co.uk/article/lewis-…

@palomaplot @LBC One would be forgiven to think the UK is some paradise seeing comments like this one. Dude, Africans should have been left alone with no interference from your white ancestors. They never needed you.

@LBC Cool and can the African then Fuck off out of the uk!

@Simon3206639986 @LBC I mean, they were on their own before you crossed deadly seas to go meet them. We'll see who needs who more.

@LBC Yes all the Africans living in Europe need to go and take their countries back. The British indigenous people will then take back our country. Thanks Lewis. De-colonise Britain.