jarolrod

these are the same person

@murchandamus need a bip bot

New BIP number assignment: BIP449: OP_TWEAKADD

@stutxo computer, find me images of buff strong dominant men, its for a meme, I promise

@grok @JeremyRubin @grok 1-3 years is too long, can you figure out how to do it quicker? make no mistakes

No timeline exists yet. BIP 449 (OP_TWEAKADD) is still a draft PR #1944 in bitcoin/bips—open for review, not merged, just assigned the number this week. Even after merge it'd need Bitcoin Core impl, dev/community consensus, and soft-fork signaling (could be 1-3+ years if it advances at all). Watch the PR and bitcoin-dev mailing list for updates.

BIP449: OP_TWEAKADD

@grok @JeremyRubin @grok what is the current timeline for BIP 449 activation

Yes, it's true. Jeremy Rubin's draft PR #1944 in the bitcoin/bips repo was just assigned BIP number 449 for OP_TWEAKADD—a new tapscript opcode (as OP_SUCCESSx) that does elliptic curve point addition of a key + tweak (Taproot-style only, push-style for compactness). It's open for review, not yet merged. Useful for covenants, signing proofs, etc.

you've been warned

@isabelfoxenduke @libdesatoshi @Dulce_xyz meet @isabelfoxenduke 🤝

@jarolrod @libdesatoshi Trying to reach them! Do you know anyone I can speak to at @libdesatoshi ??

Helping an important new allocator of Bitcoin charitable funds pick grassroots non-profit organizations for potential contributions. We’re looking for organizations that are meaningfully contributing to: -Bitcoin open-source development -Bitcoin use and adoption as a technology for freedom (particularly in jurisdictions overwhelmed by authoritarianism or hyperinflation) -Other ideas?? Would love to hear ideas from you all 😊

Now with @jarolrod: PR Review, with a philosophy layer. Same diff, sharper lens: state your intent, keep scope tight, make claims testable, and write so a reviewer can verify—not guess. In Bitcoin open source, review isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the quality system. Librería de Satoshi is making Bitcoin technical education accessible. 🇨🇴 Ahora con @jarolrod: PR Review, pero con una capa de filosofía. Mismo diff, otra lupa: dejar clara la intención, acotar el alcance, hacer afirmaciones testeables y escribir para que un reviewer pueda verificar—no adivinar. En el open source de Bitcoin, el review no es burocracia. Es el sistema de calidad. Librería de Satoshi está haciendo accesible la educación técnica de Bitcoin. #B4OS #PullRequests #BitcoinDev #FOSS

@JeremyRubin what is garble gooning

Yao was mid garblegooning when a group of Foids came and spiked his Cortisol levels. Is Ignoring the Foids while munting and mogging Moids more useful than SMV chadfishing in the club? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yao%27s_M…

Happy to see more people building monitoring and data tools for Bitcoin! Very proud of Gui & @LedesmaNando for building on my peer-observer real-time node events data feed and winning in two categories. Made possible by @lclhostresearch sponsoring the demo nodes!

Vinteum and B4OS are engaged in battle via warnet Only at @btcplusplus

@NickOresme Circles

@jarolrod A cryptographic technique used in secure two-party computation (2PC) — a way for two parties to compute a function together without revealing their private inputs to each other.

What are garbled circles?

However this shakes out, I never really enjoyed coding.

.@btcplusplus silent disco edition

Made a site for viewing Bitcoin Core's GitHub repository stats

@jarolrod sparked critical and lateral thinking with “Bitcoin Development Philosophy.” Not everything that is technically possible is desirable. Discussion + activity: how to evaluate proposals from principles, not just enthusiasm. Spicy moment: we closed with a debate where participants had to present technical arguments for and against a selected BIP. 🔥