jarolrod

541 posts

jarolrod banner
jarolrod

jarolrod

@jarolrod

@char_btc

Katılım Temmuz 2012
578 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Murch
Murch@murchandamus·
New BIP number assignment: BIP449: OP_TWEAKADD
Murch tweet media
English
4
7
35
11.4K
jarolrod
jarolrod@jarolrod·
@stutxo computer, find me images of buff strong dominant men, its for a meme, I promise
English
0
0
4
128
Grok
Grok@grok·
No timeline exists yet. BIP 449 (OP_TWEAKADD) is still a draft PR #1944 in bitcoin/bips—open for review, not merged, just assigned the number this week. Even after merge it'd need Bitcoin Core impl, dev/community consensus, and soft-fork signaling (could be 1-3+ years if it advances at all). Watch the PR and bitcoin-dev mailing list for updates.
English
1
0
0
119
my
my@JeremyRubin·
BIP449: OP_TWEAKADD
English
6
3
18
2.1K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, it's true. Jeremy Rubin's draft PR #1944 in the bitcoin/bips repo was just assigned BIP number 449 for OP_TWEAKADD—a new tapscript opcode (as OP_SUCCESSx) that does elliptic curve point addition of a key + tweak (Taproot-style only, push-style for compactness). It's open for review, not yet merged. Useful for covenants, signing proofs, etc.
English
1
0
2
116
jarolrod retweetledi
my
my@JeremyRubin·
you've been warned
my tweet media
English
3
2
8
1.6K
Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️
Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️@isabelfoxenduke·
Helping an important new allocator of Bitcoin charitable funds pick grassroots non-profit organizations for potential contributions. We’re looking for organizations that are meaningfully contributing to: -Bitcoin open-source development -Bitcoin use and adoption as a technology for freedom (particularly in jurisdictions overwhelmed by authoritarianism or hyperinflation) -Other ideas?? Would love to hear ideas from you all 😊
English
28
2
61
3.8K
jarolrod retweetledi
Librería de Satoshi
Librería de Satoshi@libdesatoshi·
Now with @jarolrod: PR Review, with a philosophy layer. Same diff, sharper lens: state your intent, keep scope tight, make claims testable, and write so a reviewer can verify—not guess. In Bitcoin open source, review isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the quality system. Librería de Satoshi is making Bitcoin technical education accessible. 🇨🇴 Ahora con @jarolrod: PR Review, pero con una capa de filosofía. Mismo diff, otra lupa: dejar clara la intención, acotar el alcance, hacer afirmaciones testeables y escribir para que un reviewer pueda verificar—no adivinar. En el open source de Bitcoin, el review no es burocracia. Es el sistema de calidad. Librería de Satoshi está haciendo accesible la educación técnica de Bitcoin. #B4OS #PullRequests #BitcoinDev #FOSS
Librería de Satoshi tweet media
English
1
5
14
415
my
my@JeremyRubin·
Yao was mid garblegooning when a group of Foids came and spiked his Cortisol levels. Is Ignoring the Foids while munting and mogging Moids more useful than SMV chadfishing in the club? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yao%27s_M…
English
1
1
4
812
jarolrod retweetledi
jarolrod
jarolrod@jarolrod·
Vinteum and B4OS are engaged in battle via warnet Only at @btcplusplus
English
0
0
1
96
.
.@NickOresme·
@jarolrod A cryptographic technique used in secure two-party computation (2PC) — a way for two parties to compute a function together without revealing their private inputs to each other.
English
1
0
0
56
jarolrod
jarolrod@jarolrod·
What are garbled circles?
English
1
0
0
85
jarolrod retweetledi
instagibbs
instagibbs@theinstagibbs·
However this shakes out, I never really enjoyed coding.
English
9
2
36
1.8K
jarolrod retweetledi
Niklas Gögge
Niklas Gögge@dergoegge·
Made a site for viewing Bitcoin Core's GitHub repository stats
Niklas Gögge tweet mediaNiklas Gögge tweet mediaNiklas Gögge tweet mediaNiklas Gögge tweet media
English
7
23
77
7.5K
jarolrod retweetledi
Librería de Satoshi
Librería de Satoshi@libdesatoshi·
@jarolrod sparked critical and lateral thinking with “Bitcoin Development Philosophy.” Not everything that is technically possible is desirable. Discussion + activity: how to evaluate proposals from principles, not just enthusiasm. Spicy moment: we closed with a debate where participants had to present technical arguments for and against a selected BIP. 🔥
English
1
2
3
97