Jason Lynham

Reminder to every business owner: you are under NO obligation to allow random activists, influencers, or self-appointed investigators onto private property or into your office without proper legal authority. If someone shows up demanding Public Access Files, stay calm and professional: — Ask for identification — Ask who they represent — Record the interaction — Decline entry to non-public areas — Offer lawful compliance through counsel if appropriate — Have your attorney handle document requests Public Access Files are governed by specific DOL rules, not social media ambush tactics. And if false statements, selective editing, trespassing, harassment, or defamatory claims damage your business, there may absolutely be legal remedies available. America is a country of laws and due process, not trial-by-viral-video. In Texas, homeowners generally have strong private property protections. A clearly visible ‘No Soliciting’ or ‘No Trespassing’ sign can help establish notice that entry is not permitted. If someone refuses to leave after being told to do so, that can potentially become criminal trespass territory under Texas law.

If you look closely… you will see not a single slant-eyed, mussy black haired Asian male with spots in this class. Scholarships are now the new way these universities discriminate against East Asian American males, who are not eye candy for whites and thus ineligible.

I mean come on.

Indian-American philanthropist Anil Kochhar and his wife Marilyn just paid off student loans for 176 graduates at North Carolina State University. A lot of anti-India content online is manufactured outrage and racial propaganda. Indian communities contribute enormously in education, healthcare, technology, business and philanthropy across the world. Don’t let social media psyops replace reality.

this is all great, but to qualify as an Indian, you will also need to: - win the spelling bee - score > 1400 on SAT - win regeneron science compeitition - go to top university, ideally in STEM - get hired as key member of tech staff - be in the top income bracket - cofounder of a unicorn and i can go on

Republicans are now getting mad at immigrants for *assimilating.*

"Living in Dallas is the worst." I moved my business here 12 years ago: My kids are in a 10/10 school district. I live on 3 acres with no HOA and I'm only 30 mins from downtown Dallas and 35 mins from DFW airport. I'm within 45 minutes of a 6 different pro sports teams. Every band and touring musical travels here. Countless amazing restaurants. My property has appreciated by over $1m in a decade I'm buying more land 30 mins away in the path of growth for only $12k/acre I can fly direct to Dubai, Bozeman, basically anywhere. No state income taxes. The more you make, the more you save. Strong Christian/LDS family values. Tons of Indians (awesome people BTW). Cheap contractors. VERY pro business. Pretty freaking hot weather but ice cold A/C. :) Youth sports culture is kinda out of control. Property taxes will murder you NGL. Don't like it? Don't move here. I've lived in Houston, too and boy let me tell you...We've got it good here.

Of course it’s not. These are Hindus. Completely different faith, dedicated to non-violence. Indians who come here almost always do so legally and many have waited a very long time to do it. They come here and make excellent Americans.

A “Minority” MAGA wants me to stop pointing out that: - 90% of the net gain jobs since Covid have gone to foreign workers - Of that 90%, 70% of the total visas went to India - India does not have 1 college or institute in the top 50 - India is an undeveloped nation and with the US help won’t be developed for another 2 decades Why does “MAGA” love corporations making record profits, while replacing us with H-1B’s, and hate the American Worker all of a sudden? This doesn’t resonate well with the Republicans I know.

Indians aren’t hated in America despite their success, they’re hated because of it.🇺🇸🇮🇳 Conservatives see their own abandoned dreams realized by immigrants: stable families, crushing academic discipline, relentless entrepreneurship. Leftists see their sacred ideology shattered by the same people: merit over mediocrity, culture over victimhood, results over narratives. Both sides sense the indictment. Excellence has no greater enemy than those it exposes.😎 Stop hating Indians. Instead, learn what they are doing right to achieve what can be achieved by any American if they stay on the right path. Resentment is a dead end. Excellence is a choice. Choose better.👍

This Cato ‘immigrants pay more taxes’ flex + Indian chart is peak cherry-picking. Impressive numbers… until you actually look under the hood. 🧐” 1. It’s median household income, not individual or per-capita — and Indian households are structured differently • The chart (and the “twice as much” claim) uses households, not people. Indian-American households are larger on average (~3.0–3.8 people vs. U.S. average ~2.5) and far more likely to have multiple full-time high earners (dual STEM/medical professionals is common). en.wikipedia. • Indian Americans still have high personal earnings (median ~$85k for ages 16+, ~$106k for full-time workers per 2023 Pew), but the “almost twice” headline evaporates when you adjust for household size and number of workers. This is a classic statistical sleight-of-hand when comparing groups with different living arrangements. 2. Extreme positive selection bias … this is the cream of India’s elite, not “immigrants” in general • Indian Americans aren’t a random sample of India’s 1.4 billion people. The vast majority arrived via H-1B, EB-2/3, or student visas …hyper-selective for advanced degrees and high-skill jobs. You’re comparing the top ~0.1–1% of India’s talent/IQ/education distribution to the broad U.S. average (which includes everyone from McDonald’s workers to retirees). • India’s own per-capita income and education levels are far lower. This doesn’t prove broad immigration is economically magical; it proves cherry-picked high-skill immigration works for the selectees. Second-generation outcomes are strong but show some regression toward the mean, and chain migration/family sponsorship often dilutes the skill level over time. 3. Cato’s overall “immigrants pay more taxes” claim has well-documented methodological holes • Cato (a libertarian think tank that favors more immigration) attributes welfare benefits received by U.S.-born children of immigrants to “natives,” not the immigrant parents. This understates immigrant fiscal costs. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) and others note this flips the picture: when you count the full household burden (including kids), immigrant-headed households use welfare at higher rates than native-headed ones. • Cato aggregates all immigrants (high-skill Indians + low-skill groups + illegals). The net positive they find is heavily driven by the high earners. Other studies (National Academies of Sciences, Heritage, etc.) have found first-generation immigrants often impose net costs, especially low-skilled/illegal cohorts. • Their data ends before the post-2021 border surge effects fully hit long-term budgets. 4. H-1B-specific issues (the main pipeline for Indian success) • Many Indian immigrants in tech come via H-1B, which has documented problems: outsourcing/body shops (e.g., Infosys, TCS), wage suppression (foreign workers often paid less for similar roles), and ethnic nepotism once Indians reach management (preferring co-ethnics for hiring/promotions). This displaces U.S. workers and depresses wages in STEM. • Fraud allegations are common (fake credentials, benching workers, etc.). Critics argue this isn’t “adding value” so much as arbitraging cheaper labor and networks. 5. Other drains and context • Remittances: Indian Americans send massive sums back to India (India receives over $100B+ in remittances annually, a huge chunk from the U.S.). That’s money leaving the U.S. economy. • Cost of living: Indians are heavily concentrated in high-cost metros (SF Bay, NYC, etc.), where nominal incomes are inflated anyway. Adjust for purchasing power and the gap shrinks. • The post uses Indian success to defend a general “immigrants = net positive” narrative from Cato. But Indians are ~1.4% of the U.S. population and an outlier. Broad policy implications (more low-skill immigration, open borders, etc.) don’t follow from one high-performing subgroup.