
Teddy/GME Shareholder #111
942 posts





We got the drift up and slowdown we were looking for last week. Some $SPX analysis into this week. Weekly (Top Right) Daily + Long-term ATR (Top Left) Hourly + Daily Ribbon + Position ATR (Bottom Left) Hourly + Swing ATR (Bottom Right)




Whipsaw pre-market from -1 ATR back to PDC and now settling at overnight supply. I’m going to play today by ear.

Something nobody pointed out, 36 emojis and RC was selling 36 items on eBay.



Man invests $1.2m in Berkshire Hathaway at $2k/sh; 600 class A shares. Each share is now worth $750k, giving him $450M. The most crazy rich mfs you will ever meet irl will be at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. Nothing else comes close.





welcome to the 12 Posts of $BBBYQ -mas. my goal is to try to review and simplify concepts from my research into $BBBY (old). no. 10! today we will continue our thought experiment into substantial consummation and understand why this hot topic is very valuable to understand. the question was posed.. has substantial consummation occurred? similar to how we shared the snippet from the Plan, here’s the reason why this question is so important: the definition of substantial consummation—according to Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute—must include the starting of distributions under the Plan. so ask yourself, did that happen? well, according to the PCR (post-confirmation report) financial disclosures since the Effective Date, no it hasn’t. as far as I remember there has not been of any mention of a distribution occurring under the Plan. if that is the case, then the legal standard for substantial consummation to occur has not been met. hmm. so then if substantial consummation has not occurred, have a look over here: that would mean that the Confirmed Plan allows that the Plan could still be modified at any time; wowza! here’s the thing, it was somewhat of a trick question and I only explain it to help bring attention to the modification of the Plan and future distributions. this is why. either; • distributions had begun and the Plan was modified after Confirmation, but before the Effective Date, or, • distributions have not yet begun, and the Plan can still be modified, but.. both cannot be true at the same time. so which is it? like I said, it was a trick question: let us look at the thicker red box. if substantial consummation did not happen then the modifications to the Plan can be submitted to the Court at any time, and surprise! no one would know. if substantial consummation did happen then the modifications to the Plan were submitted to the court by the Effective Date and you guessed it! no one would know. the main point being that this explains why there is no “newer” information about future distributions, or why if the Plan was modified, it has not been submitted to the Court and for the public to see. notice how in the yellow highlighted section of the image we just looked at there is mention of Interests, but in the thin red square, the language only mentions Holders of Claims? that’s because the language is not boilerplate and the legal protections of any Plan modifications need to include Holders of Interests. wow! now why would that be? in my opinion the logical answer is because modifications to the Plan would include Holders of Interests—otherwise it would not be written how it is. c'est magnifique! speaking of intentional language.. there are other easter eggs to be found throughout the plan about Interests. here’s one example: remember the definition of Interests. now, if all Interests were cancelled and no longer existed as of the Effective Date.. then why would a statement about activity “On and after the Effective Date..”—again, a point in time where Interests no longer exist, right?—why are they included in the responsibilities that the plan man is allowed to use, acquire, or dispose of? the answer is obvious. and that’s all for today. I sincerely hope that you have a wonderful day, filled with positivity and personal success. until tomorrow!







