Jay Mann

You've heard about this story. Now you get to see it. I traveled to Columbus, Ohio, and witnessed the most egregious government waste I've seen in my 20 years as an investigative reporter. This has been going on for years, and you've been paying for it. Take a look⬇️

Like I said, they’re maximising worldwide audience share, hence pitching to resentful third world Muslims.

富士山の山頂で五星紅旗を振る中国人に対し、日の丸を掲げて撃退する米海兵隊員。 わざわざ日本の象徴である富士山で抗日勝利記念などと称して五星紅旗を振るなど日本に喧嘩を売る行為だ。 だから中国人は世界中で嫌われる。 アメリカの兄貴、本当にありがとう‼️

Imagine being a kid and your 40-something norwood chud dad with a midlife crisis discovers 2016-era alt right memes for the first time and like gets completely knocked out by them and makes "the redpill" his whole personality and starts podcasting

Alright, $300B more to Ukraine.

You have 2 conservative candidates: Candidate A says we must halt immigration because they’re not a good culture match, they don’t assimilate Candidates B says we must halt immigration because they’re polluting genes of the glorious white race Both want to halt immigration, so what’s the difference? I’ll tell you: Candidate B has a warped, pagan anthropology that will lead him to make evil, unjust decisions. Also, he’s completely unelectable. Purge the “Candidate Bs” from our movement, or our movement—and the country—is toast.

@aye_pete @nosoup4knowles It was over handling of the business is my guess. The biggest mistake DW ever made was hiring Candace.

@jaymann34 @nosoup4knowles It's def not about hiring Candace. They both agree she was a mistake. Makes no sense to sever such a strong partnership just because of that. Sth much bigger must've caused it.

This makes me sad 😔

The video is Prime Candace. Every manipulative rhetorical technique in the books. She makes roughly 236 claims in roughly 30 minutes in what is probably one of the most concise examples of a Gish gallop I have ever seen. A Gish gallop is firing off so many claims in rapid succession your opponent can’t possibly address them all. Even if every claim is wrong, the preponderance of false claims produces the impression of a devastating case. Coupled with Brandolini’s Law, which posits that the amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it. The whole process is meant to make the accused look crazy for even trying. Candace uses rhetorical sleight of hand to accuse me of accusing her husband of lying on his immigration documents. I might respond that I’ve never made any such claim. But Candace has already suggested I’m working with Laura Loomer to launder the accusation against her. I might respond that I haven’t spoken privately to Laura Loomer in years. But Candace has already moved on to say that I’m coordinating with Ben Shapiro to launder ideas to Laura Loomer. So I might respond that I haven’t spoken to Ben Shapiro in over a year, other than a single text exchange when Charlie died. But Candace has already moved on to calling me a creep. Each of my responses, by the way, will be immediately attacked in its own right. Candace’s audience will insist her accusation is true, even though she has offered no proof, and will likewise demand I provide proof of my counter claim. Asymmetric skepticism and burden shifting. I will not be able to prove that I didn’t make a claim, because one cannot prove a negative. Sure, they won’t be able to show any proof that I did make such a claim, but no burden of proof applies to them. Show us your texts! You must have deleted the texts! You had a stupid haircut as a child! The over 200 accusations scale with your answers. Answering one doesn't drop the total to 235 – it scales it up exponentially, because your answer becomes the source of a new onslaught of charges from Candace and her legion. Pretty soon, not only is the sheer number of accusations condemning, but the sheer number of accusers becomes proof that Candace is winning! Vox populi, vox Dei! Trying to defend yourself against such madness is madness. It’s like trying to nail Jello to a wall. You might think there is one claim I simply have to address: That a Daily Wire employee was arrested for sex crimes involving a minor. But while that accusation is terrible, it has nothing to do with me. As the document Candace posted makes clear, this person was arrested in May of 2025. I left the company in March of 2025. Whatever actions the company did or didn’t take when it learned of the situation, I was not a part of it. To be honest, I’m not actually sure what Candace is accusing me of, other than her deeply twisted statement that “people who support Israel will also protect the Epstein class of pedophiles.” Protect how? What exactly am I being accused of? I would ask Candace to state her allegations clearly and specifically. Otherwise, I choose door number three. By the way, if you employ enough people, you will inevitably employ some terrible ones. Hell, I once employed Candace Owens! Employees are people. If you have enough of them, you have all of the different kinds of people there are. Some will even be criminals, and you will have to fire them, which is what I’m guessing the Daily Wire did in this case. Other than that, I have nothing to say to Candace. She invited me to come on her show to talk about George, but I have nothing to say about George at all. She invited me to talk about this person she says committed this terrible crime, but an hour of “Have you stopped beating your wife,” guilt-by-association slander isn’t my idea of a good time. And I may not be the smartest person in media, but I’m just sophisticated enough to know you can’t have a good-faith conversation with someone who uses rhetoric in such dishonest ways. Candace doesn’t want to talk; she wants to overwhelm me with so many allegations and insinuations, so much projection and presupposition and false consensus signaling that her audience builds a negative narrative about me – whatever negative narrative sticks! I see no reason to engage in that kind of spectacle. Also, my audience is rightly concerned for my safety if I go to Candace’s studio.

Russia was set to be the big winner if the anti- fracking efforts they backed were successful back in the 2000s. Who wins if the US loses the AI computing and data race? The same cast of characters are running a similar playbook but with much bigger end game ramifications. This time it's not Russia, - it's pretty clear it's going to be - 中国共产党

Someone please tell this idiot that when you realize the truth about Islam, you automatically become pro-Israel. It’s not that someone becomes anti-Islam because they chose to be pro-Israel. The reason is that this civilizational conflict has been reduced to a choice: either you side with Israel, or you end up like Tucker and Megan, empowering Islam and making the West vulnerable and weak. Someone please send her the article in the comments.

"Conservatives" who defend Islam are much worse than leftists who defend Islam. They are traitors to conservatism, patriotism, and Christianity. I knew that this was coming. I knew that some opportunists within the right would begin pandering to Muslims because they have no principles which they stand by. They are here for numbers, money, and approval, and they will happily sell out. The same thing happened in European countries. Of course it will also happen in America. These are the ones who open the gates. They are happy to assist the Islamic takeover of Western towns and communities. Once Muslims have enough power by which they imposes policies that favor Islam and discriminate against Christians, these same people will act as if they had no idea how all of this happened. Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly are great examples of how it begins.

A single intercourse with one of the virgins of paradise will last seventy thousand years. The Islamic afterlife isn’t about communion with God, spiritual enlightenment, or divine wisdom, it’s a carnal, male-centered fantasy of unlimited sexual gratification. Islamic texts describe these women as perpetual virgins, untouched, and designed solely for the pleasure of men. “Indeed, We have produced the women of Paradise in a [new] creation. And made them virgins, devoted [to their husbands] and of equal age.” (Quran 56:35-37) “Fair ones reserved in pavilions. Untouched before by any man or jinn.” (Quran 55:72-74) Hadith collections affirm that after every act of intercourse, these “virgins” miraculously return to a state of virginity so the process can be repeated endlessly. These heavenly beings are not just virgins, they are physically exaggerated to fulfill male fantasies: Large, round breasts:“Indeed, for the pious there is a triumph… full-breasted companions of equal age.” (Quran 78:31-33) The Arabic term kawa‘ib in 78:33 literally means “firm, swelling breasts.” Big, lustrous eyes:“They will have maidens with intensely white skin and large black eyes, as if they were hidden pearls.” (Quran 52:20) Glowing, hairless, smooth skin:“If one of the women of paradise were to appear to the people of the earth, she would fill the space between heaven and earth with light and fragrance.” (Tirmidhi, 2538) Muhammad explicitly stated that men in paradise will have endless sexual stamina, never experiencing fatigue. The virgins, in turn, never get tired, never say no, and are always ready for intercourse. The Prophet was asked, “O Messenger of Allah, do we have sexual intercourse in Paradise?” He replied: “Yes, by the One in Whose Hand is my soul, a man will have sexual intercourse with a hundred virgins in one morning.” (Ibn Majah, 4337) Another hadith states that men will be given the strength of 100 men in sexual performance. (Tirmidhi, 2536) According to Al-Suyuti, a famous Islamic scholar: “The believer will be given such and such strength in paradise for intercourse… A single intercourse with one of the virgins of paradise will last seventy thousand years.” (Al-Suyuti, Al-Haba’ik fi Akhbar al-Mala’ik) These “virgins” don’t need to poop, pee, or sweat, they exist for one purpose: eternal male pleasure. “They will neither urinate, defecate, nor suffer from phlegm or mucus. Their sweat will be musk.” (Muslim, 2834) “They will be hairless except for their eyebrows and eyelashes.” (Tirmidhi, 2536) A believer doesn’t get just one virgin, he gets dozens, or even hundreds. “A martyr will have 72 virgins.” (Tirmidhi, 1663) “The lowest rank of a person in paradise will have 80,000 servants and 72 wives.” (Ibn Majah, 4337) While men are promised an endless supply of sex slaves, the fate of women in Islam’s paradise is nonexistent or humiliating. Women in Islamic eschatology exist only for men’s pleasure, nothing else. While other religions speak of enlightenment, unity with God, or transcendent joy, Islam offers a pornographic fantasy land where men indulge in endless sex, alcohol, and servitude. What kind of God rewards faithfulness with an eternal orgy? What kind of religion reduces the afterlife to a hypersexualized playground? This is not spiritual. This is not divine. This is the theology of a man who designed an afterlife to justify his own sexual obsessions. And yet, Muslims claim Islam is the most moral and pure religion. Islam’s paradise is nothing more than a cosmic brothel.

The entire history of the Muslim-Jewish conflicts in the land since the Ottoman Empire days summed up purrfectly in 35 seconds

@RichardBSpencer Batman is the good guy. It’s leftists that typically paint in blurry moral lines.

A major problem with Nolan is his moralizing. All the heroes have to be "good guys": moral, down-to-earth, family men. Batman's a "good guy," who wants to inspire Gotham and believes that every citizen is a fellow "good guy"; Oppenheimer is an American patriot and wracked with guilt; Even Cobb in Inception, who's a criminal, is a "good guy" who wants to see his kids. Odysseus seems less of the "man of twists and turns" than a "good guy" who "just wants to go home." I don't think this is a fatal flaw exactly—I generally like Nolan movies—so much as it is a limitation. In The Iliad, Achilles and the Greeks are alienating and terrifying; they are the "bad guys" after all. Epic characters shouldn't always be "relatable."

NEW 🔴 A U.S. Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet fired 20mm cannon rounds to disable the rudder of an Iranian-flagged oil tanker that refused to comply with blockade warnings in the Gulf of Oman, according to CENTCOM. The vessel, M/T Hasna, was heading toward an Iranian port and is no longer in transit. The U.S. blockade remains in full effect.

This white, Christian, “heritage American” Republican facilitated unprecedented 3rd-world migration to Ohio.

This is the perfect definition of being “spiritually Palestinian”

A lot of you guys want to think pro-Putin Russians are based. If you actually talk to them, you’ll realize they’ve abandoned socialism but are still Leninists. They’ll tell you the big bad West only got rich by exploiting Africa or something.

"Professor, don't you find it curious that a new US-Iran peace deal leaks almost every time the 10y UST yield breaks 4.4% on the upside?" "Actually, if I think about it, I don't find it curious at all."