john Gordon

1.8K posts

john Gordon

john Gordon

@jbgor007

50 in oct. Work as finance controller at notts police. If love sport, 20th century music, nature pointless connect. Only those with sense of humour need apply.

west Bridgford Nottingham Katılım Mart 2014
846 Takip Edilen75 Takipçiler
john Gordon retweetledi
Paul Rees. ex Rucksack.
Paul Rees. ex Rucksack.@HannahIamthest1·
Kier Starmer was visiting a school in Wales and the class was in the middle of a discussion about words and their meanings. The teacher asked Kier if he would like to lead the discussion on the word "tragedy". A boy stood up and said "if my best friend who lives on a farm, is playing in a field and a tractor runs him over and kills him, that'd be a tragedy." "Incorrect" says Starmer, "that would be an accident. " A girl raised her hand and said "if a school bus carrying 50 children inside drives over a cliff killing everyone inside, that'd be a tragedy." "No" says Starmer, "that's what we call a great loss." Little Johnny put his hand up and said, "if a plane carrying you and Lammy is hit by friendly fire missile and blown to pieces, that would be a tragedy. " "Brilliant!" Says Starmer. " now, can you tell me why that would be a tragedy?" Little Johnny replies, "Well, it wouldn't be a great loss and it probably wouldn't be an accident, either." 🤣🤣🤣
English
69
347
2.2K
182.1K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@Tush27J Helen Whately supported Remain in the referendum as did a lot of Tory MPs including Liz Truss & Robert Jenrick. As a matter of fact this pledge was met. Whether it was down to Brexit or would have happened anyway is a separate argument
English
0
0
0
59
Alethea Bernard
Alethea Bernard@Tush27J·
As Caroline Lucas did such an excellent job disposing of Tory Helen Whately and Reform UK's James Orr - a reminder of the bullshit that was Brexit. #Brexit #bbcqt
Alethea Bernard tweet media
English
124
329
827
9.4K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@SEANLWOODCOCK How did she u turn. On day 1 she said we should have let the Americans use Diego Garcia & RAF Fairford that is still her position. She also thinks RAF should take out missile launchers firing on our air bases. She still thinks that. Why do so many Labour MPs misrepresent her
English
0
0
6
104
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@MaxKendix Hermerton as a tribute to that upholder of international law
English
0
0
1
722
Max Kendix
Max Kendix@MaxKendix·
Exc: What will Labour name its new towns? We can reveal some options drawn up by officials... - Elizabethtown (after late Queen) - Pankhurst (after suffragette Emmeline) - Attleeton (after ex-PM) - Athelstan (first King of England) - Seacole (after nurse Mary)
English
20
12
78
115.6K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@montie Decision not to support US is a real mistake by Starmer. His worst decision and it's a crowded field. Take away the bluster & Trump is clearly really annoyed. I'm sure we'll still share intelligence etc but forget any further trade deals but my worry is the impact on Ukraine.
English
1
0
1
297
Tim Montgomerie 🇬🇧
Wrong, I'm afraid. This correct decision is completely consistent with Starmer's position that Britain will support defensive actions especially any that thwart DIRECT Iranian attacks on British assets and allies. I'm one of a small minority of Brits who see the US-led action against Iran as a risky but estimable effort to overthrow or, at least, massively degrade one of history's most poisonous and totalitarian regimes. A regime that would blackmail its neighbours and what's left of the free west if it acquired nuclear weapons - potentially quite soon and so waiting for a better time to act reeks of cowardice. The eight post-WWII decades in which the good guys have held the upper, stronger and winning hand in geopolitics will be over (and, yes, the west is overwhelmingly preferable to all alternative polecon models). But my view is most definitely not the view of a clear majority of Brits and I fear it's a settled view both here and throughout Europe. On this issue Starmer is much more in tune with voters than me. He may even be thinking that the popularity of his Iran stance might save him from a leadership challenge after Labour gets routed in May's elections. The intl lawyer inside him actually may believe in this policy (or at least Ed Miliband does, his govt's increasingly assertive backseat driver) and - exceptionally - voters approve of it. So this is not a u-turn and the chances of one happening in the coming weeks? As likely as a Mandelson return.
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch

Mother of all U-turns.

English
61
33
253
104K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@montie If it was consistent with previous policy of using air bases for defensive actions there would be no need for us to give authorisation. I'm old enough to remember the Falklands & the annoyance when Americans wavered in supporting our actions before Reagan agreed to support us
English
0
0
1
364
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@AyoubKhanMP If I look through your twitter feed presumably I'll find your wishes to all Jewish people to have a happy Hanukkah last December. King Charles leads all of us. Kemi just leads the Consevative party. It's not her religion so she probably doesn't feel strongly about celebrating Eid
English
0
0
0
380
Ayoub Khan MP
Ayoub Khan MP@AyoubKhanMP·
The head of state King Charles and most party leaders sent warm wishes to 6 million British Muslims …. yet the Conservatives and Reform stayed silent. And Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage want to lead a “United” Kingdom? The contradiction speaks for itself!
English
420
211
1.3K
43.1K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@LeoMontague91 She clearly said RAF jets are just hanging around. Starmer might be arguing that earlier she referred to decisions not being taken but it's pretty clear to me she was referring to the government not taking decisions not RAF because Hermer was advising air strikes was unlawful
English
1
0
5
80
Cllr Leo Montague
Cllr Leo Montague@LeoMontague91·
First - Kemi is unbelievably triggered from a couple of, admittedly, very bad weeks for her politically. Second - this is entirely consistent with the ongoing Government position, so yet again the jump to politicise everything makes her look foolish.
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch

Mother of all U-turns.

English
32
23
216
13.7K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@LeoMontague91 A position Starmer supported but then he was ahead in the polls so he was making decisions based on our national security not his job security. As Cleverly explained shooting missiles from sky is more risky, far more costly & uses up missiles that should be being used in Ukraine
English
0
0
0
24
Cllr Leo Montague
Cllr Leo Montague@LeoMontague91·
@jbgor007 He already comes over as statesmanlike. In times gone by opposition leaders would have rowed in behind Starmer as he deals with an international crisis. The moment Badenoch decided to play politics, she ended whatever tiny possibility she ever had of becoming PM. Unsuitable.
English
6
0
0
170
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@LeoMontague91 Starmer is playing politics by deliberately misrepresenting the Conservative position which is they would have allowed use of the airbases and they would allow limited sorties into Iran or Lebanon to take out missile launchers just as we did with Houthis when Sunak was in charge
English
0
0
0
65
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@LeoMontague91 No other previous PM would have refused the request to use the airbases apart from possibly Gordon Brown on a bad day. With troops in the region we were never going to avoid the war so now we're in a position where Iran think we're in the war but our No 1 ally no longer trusts us
English
0
0
0
39
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@IainDale @mattfrei Can we have a mature discussion on future of NHS in UK ? On QT last night Streeting shouted down Reform spokesman for questioning the NHS funding model despite Reform insisting NHS will remain free to use. I'm no fan of Reform but can't we even discuss other funding options
English
0
0
0
21
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@DavidMcGregorBN Or alternatively one party bankrupts the country as happened in 1979 & 2010 and the other one has to come and recover the nation's finances before falling out over internal disputes after more than a decade in power.
English
0
0
0
61
David
David@DavidMcGregorBN·
People say “the 2 party system doesn’t work” as if both parties have been equally useless. One party smashes the country to bits. Labour comes in and has to rebuild it. It was true after Thatcher. And it’s true again after 14 years of Tory decline.
English
971
208
1K
46.8K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@EdwardJDavey Is the Not the 9 o clock news joke that meanwhile in Iran the search goes on for the Ayatollah's contact lens no longer acceptable
English
0
0
0
32
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@DPJHodges I don't really understand Nick Timothy's concern over this but what is more worrying is the pile on him for questioning this. This isn't a racist attack or a resignation matter but perhaps an indication that Kemi isn't looking for the Muslim vote which may be unwise
English
0
0
0
242
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
This isn't just bigoted. It's also intellectually bankrupt. Kruger is literally saying Christians should have rights of worship not afforded to followers of other faiths. Then claims for followers of those faiths to ask for equity is an act of "dominance".
Danny Kruger@danny__kruger

Nick Timothy and Nigel Farage are right, and Sadiq Khan and Keir Starmer are wrong. Small groups of people, of whatever religion, praying in public places is fine. And as a Christian country we should allow a special privilege for churches to lead services in our national spaces, like the Palm Sunday celebration that happens in Trafalgar Square. What we don't want is mass ritual observances intended to claim the civic realm for another religion, or assert the domination of another culture over our own Christian traditions. What happens in our national spaces is not neutral. People use Trafalgar Square, for celebrations and demonstrations, to make a point about the kind of country they want us to be. The Palm Sunday pageant reminds us of who we are - not as individuals (many or most of us don't identify as Christians at all) but as a national community, with the roots of our institutions in the ground of the Bible and our most solemn communal moments, from coronations to funerals, mediated through the liturgies of the Church. A mass Adhan held there, or in any town square, is making a different point: that Britain is not a Christian country, and that - inshallah - one day it shall be Muslim. This is unacceptable to the British public and indeed incompatible with our constitution. As ever with these debates, the issue is partly one of kind and partly one of degree. There is an issue with Islam itself as a religion which in most interpretations does not admit of pluralism or freedom of conscience, and therefore is inherently aggrandising, including over territory. But with a bit of confidence and a bit of toleration we could handle that - if it were not for the issue of degree. It is the scale of Islam in Britain, and the ambition of its leaders for greater scale, that makes the problem. The numbers of people who assembled for the adhan in Trafalgar Square, clearly and openly claiming the territory for a faith with no connection (indeed, with strong doctrinal disagreement) with the model of Western liberal democracy that Britain has developed and exported to the world - that is the problem. The numbers, whether everyone there understood it this way or not (and I suspect many did), convey an explicit threat to the foundations of our country. Being relaxed about other people's religion is a good thing, a very British thing. I don't mind modern druids dancing around Stonehenge in my constituency (arguably, though the historicity is tenuous, they have a claim to the place). I don't mind small groups of Hindus or Buddhists or Muslims demonstrating the reality of Britain's religious toleration by worshiping in Trafalgar Square. But let's not kid ourselves about this adhan, or pretend that we're just seeing another harmless expression of Britain's religious diversity. We are seeing an abuse of liberalism, led by people who are not themselves liberal; or - let us imagine they are acting in good faith - who are themselves deceived about what they are doing. It should not happen again. And it would be good to hear the Church of England say so.

English
545
116
888
138.1K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@daddofriel @BBCNewsnight Rees Mogg is also regularly on newsnight. yes he's billed as a GB News presenter but you know what you get from him and really he's there as an ex Tory cabinet minister. I presume the third is Tom Harwood who is a more typical GB News, Reform sympathiser
English
0
0
1
35
mick (daddo) friel
mick (daddo) friel@daddofriel·
Camilla Tominey introduced as from the Telegraph,what Paddy O’Connell fails to tell viewers is she also a GBnews presenter. At least the 3rd to appear on #Newsnight in the last week or so. Is @BBCNewsnight now twinned with the Reform propaganda channel?
Peter Oborne@OborneTweets

A massively consequential investigation by Alan Rusbridger into GB News: how "one political party in Britain has effectively ended up with its own television station". Raises deep questions about hi-jacking of British media/political culture: thenewworld.co.uk/alan-rusbridge…

English
22
215
519
8.9K
john Gordon
john Gordon@jbgor007·
@daddofriel @BBCNewsnight She does the equivalent of the Laura K show for GB News. To be fair to her she grills politicians from all parties equally and it's not as biased as the rest of GB News output. Yes she's a Tory but there's plenty of lefties on Newsnight to counter.
English
0
0
1
58