jeb hart

@3Fiddy5 @SarahLongwell25 I have and the actual concerns have never been addressed. They just continue to answer the question that nobody is actually asking in different ways and saying that the matter of settled.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 I know Maricopa created a list online of all concerns and resolutions. I wouldn't be surprised if Georgia did the same. Have you looked for one?

Trump is really terrified that Democrats might have some oversight after the 2026 election, so he preemptively working to delegitimize America’s elections. That’s all this speech was. Undermining American elections. Outrageous.

You keep repeating the conclusion instead of providing the record. If every concern was investigated and disproved, there should be a clear public accounting of each allegation, the evidence examined, and the result. “They looked into it” is an assertion, not documentation. And I’m still pointing out two things that have never been answered. How can you know that a machine that was not zeroed didn’t count ballots it shouldn’t have? The answer is you don’t know because it’s impossible to know because if they weren’t zeroed, you have no idea. That’s the reason you do that… also they need to Show the record on the computers where they scanned ballots multiple times on camera after they kicked the poll watchers out. They said it was a paper jam so they had to run them multiple times have never given proof that they weren’t counted multiple times. It’s a very easy fix, they know the machine number and the computer number they have a record of it put it out on the front street and ease everyone’s concerns but they don’t do any of that. They just said it was a paper jam. Again, I’m not alleging anything. I’m just saying that their answers of we looked into it. Do not suffice.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 Donald Trump listed several concerns in his call with GA election officials in 2020. All were investigated.. It's just none of them were found to be accurate.

As far as I’m aware” is doing a lot of work there. If all 200-plus concerns were investigated and resolved, there should be a public record listing each concern, the evidence reviewed, and the finding. Pointing to that record would answer the question; simply asserting it does not. No one‘s ever answered how non zeroed machines had no effect… they said they looked into it, and it didn’t matter. Never explained why. They never explained why a bathroom leak on the other side of the stadium at six in the morning made them evacuate all of the Paul watchers and media 16 hours later the investigations if you wanna call them that or them checking their own homework and saying it’s fine the only thing that third-party auditors did was check the ballot totals at the end, not any of the procedural problems that they themselves admitted happened.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 I believe Georgia received over 200 concerns during the 2020 election. As far as I'm aware, they were all investigated and answered.

“No process is perfect” is exactly why specific failures should be examined rather than waved away. The existence of bipartisan observers and audits does not prove that every control worked in every instance. The question is not whether elections are generally reliable, but whether the particular concern being raised was actually resolved.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 There are audit checks and controls at every step of the process. Bipartisan teams of election observers, lawyers and auditors that check all those boxes. There's no smoke filled back room. No process that involves humans is perfect, but elections come pretty close.

Right—but that answers a narrow question: did the physical ballot count match the tabulator total? It does not answer separate questions about ballot validity, required documentation, chain of custody, or procedural compliance. Confirming the count is not the same as resolving every concern about the process.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 The signed tabulator tapes are an election worker verifying that the number of ballots in the bag matches the number on the tape. The hand count did the same thing.

They didn’t have a baseline to know if it mattered or not. A hand recount only tells you that the ballot numbers match (which incidentally enough they didn’t on all three of the recounts, but that’s neither here nor there) it doesn’t tell you if the ballots were valid it doesn’t tell you anything other than the count. it’s an answer to a question that no one was asking. people keep saying they did a hand count. Nobody gives a damn they want to know how you can tell me that the ballots they chose to count that they never signed were valid that the machine machines that they never zeroed didn’t count votes that shouldn’t have counted. They have never explained their rationale for saying that it was not material

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 The unsigned tabulator tapes became irrelevant because Fulton County went through a complete hand recount and matched it with the tape totals.

I understand why people are tired of hearing about 2020, and Trump’s careless rhetoric has made legitimate questions easier to dismiss. But “get over it” is not an adequate response to documented failures in an election system. This is not necessarily about overturning the result or claiming Trump secretly won. The election was certified, Biden served his term, and that cannot be reversed. The question is whether weaknesses, irregularities, or possible misconduct were fully investigated so they do not happen again. People often say the election was audited, but an audit answers only the question it was designed to answer. A recount may show that ballots were counted consistently, but not that every ballot was lawful, every registration valid, every chain-of-custody rule followed, or every investigative lead pursued. A machine test may confirm accurate performance during the test, but not resolve questions about access, procedures, records, or what happened earlier. That is the central frustration: many concerns were answered with responses to different questions. Questions about missing documentation were met with assurances that the final count was accurate. Questions about suspicious registration applications were answered by noting that they were caught before ballots were issued. Questions about procedural violations were dismissed because no one proved enough illegal votes to change the outcome. Those responses may be relevant, but they do not resolve the original concerns. An unanswered question is not proof of fraud and should never be presented that way. But failing to prove an outcome-changing conspiracy is not proof that every irregularity was imaginary, every procedure was followed, or every investigation was adequate. Election integrity is not about endlessly relitigating the winner. It is about establishing what happened, correcting weaknesses, prosecuting provable misconduct, and providing enough transparency that the same unresolved questions do not follow every future election. You can believe Biden won in 2020 and still believe some important questions were never properly answered. Those positions are not contradictory.

Creating chaos, fear and impossible barriers for the very people working in our communities and following the legal immigration process is a costly agenda that harms us all. We will not be bystanders to Trump’s harmful policies. California will continue to fight back.

I understand why people are tired of hearing about 2020, and Trump’s careless rhetoric has made legitimate questions easier to dismiss. But “get over it” is not an adequate response to documented failures in an election system. This is not necessarily about overturning the result or claiming Trump secretly won. The election was certified, Biden served his term, and that cannot be reversed. The question is whether weaknesses, irregularities, or possible misconduct were fully investigated so they do not happen again. People often say the election was audited, but an audit answers only the question it was designed to answer. A recount may show that ballots were counted consistently, but not that every ballot was lawful, every registration valid, every chain-of-custody rule followed, or every investigative lead pursued. A machine test may confirm accurate performance during the test, but not resolve questions about access, procedures, records, or what happened earlier. That is the central frustration: many concerns were answered with responses to different questions. Questions about missing documentation were met with assurances that the final count was accurate. Questions about suspicious registration applications were answered by noting that they were caught before ballots were issued. Questions about procedural violations were dismissed because no one proved enough illegal votes to change the outcome. Those responses may be relevant, but they do not resolve the original concerns. An unanswered question is not proof of fraud and should never be presented that way. But failing to prove an outcome-changing conspiracy is not proof that every irregularity was imaginary, every procedure was followed, or every investigation was adequate. Election integrity is not about endlessly relitigating the winner. It is about establishing what happened, correcting weaknesses, prosecuting provable misconduct, and providing enough transparency that the same unresolved questions do not follow every future election. You can believe Biden won in 2020 and still believe some important questions were never properly answered. Those positions are not contradictory.

If there’s one thing Donald Trump has proven, it’s that he will always try to sabotage an election he fears losing. This November will be no different. It’s as predictable as it is dangerous. No amount of lies and conspiracy theories can change what’s been proven time and again: our elections are safe, secure, and accurate. The president’s speech tonight was designed to intimidate and silence voters, tearing at the very fabric of our democracy. It won’t work — not here. California has cemented its position as the answer to Donald Trump’s chaos. I know exactly how to hold this president accountable, because I did it 122 times as California’s Attorney General. Every time he attacked our rights, our communities, and our democracy – I made sure California stood up, fought back, and won. If Donald Trump crosses that line, today – and tomorrow as your Governor – we will respond. California will leverage every tool at its disposal — in the courts, at the ballot box, and organizations in every community across this state — to drive turnout, protect every voter’s right to cast their ballot, and ensure every one of those ballots is counted. Every voter. Every ballot. Every time.

I understand why people are tired of hearing about 2020, and Trump’s careless rhetoric has made legitimate questions easier to dismiss. But “get over it” is not an adequate response to documented failures in an election system. This is not necessarily about overturning the result or claiming Trump secretly won. The election was certified, Biden served his term, and that cannot be reversed. The question is whether weaknesses, irregularities, or possible misconduct were fully investigated so they do not happen again. People often say the election was audited, but an audit answers only the question it was designed to answer. A recount may show that ballots were counted consistently, but not that every ballot was lawful, every registration valid, every chain-of-custody rule followed, or every investigative lead pursued. A machine test may confirm accurate performance during the test, but not resolve questions about access, procedures, records, or what happened earlier. That is the central frustration: many concerns were answered with responses to different questions. Questions about missing documentation were met with assurances that the final count was accurate. Questions about suspicious registration applications were answered by noting that they were caught before ballots were issued. Questions about procedural violations were dismissed because no one proved enough illegal votes to change the outcome. Those responses may be relevant, but they do not resolve the original concerns. An unanswered question is not proof of fraud and should never be presented that way. But failing to prove an outcome-changing conspiracy is not proof that every irregularity was imaginary, every procedure was followed, or every investigation was adequate. Election integrity is not about endlessly relitigating the winner. It is about establishing what happened, correcting weaknesses, prosecuting provable misconduct, and providing enough transparency that the same unresolved questions do not follow every future election. You can believe Biden won in 2020 and still believe some important questions were never properly answered. Those positions are not contradictory.

Let me lay out the facts: Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. Period. Despite his false claims, there is no evidence of any widespread voter fraud in that election and we heard nothing new tonight. Remember, Donald Trump was President at the time and even his own Administration said the election was safe and secure. It’s been more than half a decade, with numerous audits, recounts, and more than 60 court cases, each finding no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Clearly, this is no longer about an election Donald Trump lost six years ago. It’s about him laying the groundwork to try to “takeover the voting” in the upcoming midterm elections. Donald Trump is desperate to pass the anti-voter SAVE Act and sow doubt in our elections because Republicans will have to face voters in November — and voters are ready to hold them accountable for Trump's unauthorized war in Iran, higher prices for gas, groceries, rent, and healthcare, and Trump’s shameless corruption. As California Secretary of State for the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, I oversaw safe and secure elections with record voter participation — the sign of a strong democracy. Donald Trump’s conspiracy theories about the integrity of our elections are false. We cannot and will not let him erode trust in American democracy.

I understand why people are tired of hearing about 2020, and Trump’s careless rhetoric has made legitimate questions easier to dismiss. But “get over it” is not an adequate response to documented failures in an election system. This is not necessarily about overturning the result or claiming Trump secretly won. The election was certified, Biden served his term, and that cannot be reversed. The question is whether weaknesses, irregularities, or possible misconduct were fully investigated so they do not happen again. People often say the election was audited, but an audit answers only the question it was designed to answer. A recount may show that ballots were counted consistently, but not that every ballot was lawful, every registration valid, every chain-of-custody rule followed, or every investigative lead pursued. A machine test may confirm accurate performance during the test, but not resolve questions about access, procedures, records, or what happened earlier. That is the central frustration: many concerns were answered with responses to different questions. Questions about missing documentation were met with assurances that the final count was accurate. Questions about suspicious registration applications were answered by noting that they were caught before ballots were issued. Questions about procedural violations were dismissed because no one proved enough illegal votes to change the outcome. Those responses may be relevant, but they do not resolve the original concerns. An unanswered question is not proof of fraud and should never be presented that way. But failing to prove an outcome-changing conspiracy is not proof that every irregularity was imaginary, every procedure was followed, or every investigation was adequate. Election integrity is not about endlessly relitigating the winner. It is about establishing what happened, correcting weaknesses, prosecuting provable misconduct, and providing enough transparency that the same unresolved questions do not follow every future election. You can believe Biden won in 2020 and still believe some important questions were never properly answered. Those positions are not contradictory.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 There already is you idiot

@3Fiddy5 @SarahLongwell25 Can you tell me how 315000 unsigned tabulator tapes in Fulton county had “no effect” or the non-zeroed machines at all but 2 precincts made no difference in the outcome? Bc Fulton certainly has not answered that very reasonable question.

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 That's not correct. Trump created that distrust. And his followers will believe his lies no matter how much transparency there is. Maricopa's 2020 election audit is an example. They used their own auditor.. Took 6 months to search, and found Biden did win. It changed nothing.

@brisketkidtx @SarahLongwell25 Can you tell me how 315000 unsigned tabulator tapes in Fulton county had “no effect” or the non-zeroed machines at all but 2 precincts made no difference in the outcome? Bc Fulton certainly has not answered that very reasonable question

@jeb_hart @SarahLongwell25 You don't trust because you believe the lies. You believe anything the child fucker says. You're not discerning and the world doesn't have to bend to the stupid.

@HughJasoull Have you read the four batches of documents that be released at the same time of that speech? Also, are you aware how court proceedings work? The timelines, etc. evidently proceedings and the like?

If Trump had actual evidence of voter fraud, he would be showing a court. What he did tonight was performative nonsense because his poll numbers are in the toilet.

@CAgovernor Also, it’s a little racist to think that minorities are incapable of getting ID…. The soft bigotry of low expectations.

@CAgovernor You put together a series of laws that make even checking for fraud impossible. Shut up you fucking clown. You are slick. I’ll give you that though

What separates a democracy from a monarchy and dictatorship is the fundamental right to vote. Lose that, and you lose everything. Donald Trump is telling us right now that he'll do anything to hold onto power.

@donald_mcgeeber 1 bill one issue… that should be the standard. TN State House works that way, which is why it actually works. Each bill has to be about one thing and any amendment to it has to be directly involved with the core issue of the Bill.

I hate how Trump tries to act like the Save America Act is solely about election integrity. Bills should be about one topic. He’s sneaking other stuff in the bill.

10 worst states to live in for 2026, per CNBC: 1. Tennessee 2. Texas 3. Indiana 4. Louisiana 5. Georgia 6. Utah 7. Missouri 8. Alabama 9. Oklahoma 10.Arkansas

They violated their own policies in giving the card. They used slow motion which they can’t do if I got a speeding ticket whether I was speeding or not wouldn’t matter if they used a Polaroid camera instead of a radar gun. Even if there’s no way to appeal, the speeding ticket you can appeal the process.

For the gringos...

People just keep forgetting that this, while I agree with you, doesn’t matter. They use slow motion to judge the foul, which is against their rules so they use 27 to resolve their screwup without admitting fault or blaming a ref. People keep saying that it’s against the rules for them to resend a red card which I didn’t do they suspended it. They don’t say or talk about the fact that how they got there was against their own rules if you have evidence in a trial that was procured in-properly it gets thrown out it’s fruit of the poison tree.

@NacksonD @stuholden No. The Bosnian drops his shoulder and hits Balogun from behind. Balogun is knocked of balance and steps on the ankle. I would not call a foul on the play. If there is a foul, however, it is by the Bosnian who comes in with the lowered shoulder from behind.

So by suspending the “red card” they are admitting without admitting, that the decision was absolutely wrong (which we knew). But to do this 24 hours before the game is quite a thing and will create a stir in Belgium no doubt. Right outcome, wrong process. Crazy turn of events.