Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·9 Nis@whignewtons Very true - just like every copyright-able subject matter. It’s really not different - or shouldn’t be. Anyway, love the podcast.Çevir English0000
Sarah Isgur@whignewtons·9 Nis@jeffostrow Yes it is! But not that computer code is copyright-able. That’s by statute!Çevir English1000
Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·9 Nis@whignewtons copyright is in the constitution. Art 1 section 8.8. And Breyer heard Lotus v Borland which foreshadowed O v G.Çevir English2000
Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·9 NisHe’s been wanting to write this opinion since the mid 1990s when he heard Lotus at the 1st circuit, got promoted (it was rearguard at the circuit) and then he heard it again at scotus. Only to deadlock 4-4... he loves this issue.Çevir English0000
Jeffrey Ostrow retweetlediStanford Men’s Rowing@stanfordmrowing·19 MayProud of the effort the team put forth today. Here is the story from the Pac-12 Championships. oak.ctx.ly/r/12l9xÇevir English03901