Jeffrey Ostrow

4 posts

Jeffrey Ostrow

Jeffrey Ostrow

@jeffostrow

Palo Alto, CA Katılım Mayıs 2009
28 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler
Jeffrey Ostrow
Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·
@whignewtons Very true - just like every copyright-able subject matter. It’s really not different - or shouldn’t be. Anyway, love the podcast.
English
0
0
0
0
Sarah Isgur
Sarah Isgur@whignewtons·
@jeffostrow Yes it is! But not that computer code is copyright-able. That’s by statute!
English
1
0
0
0
Jeffrey Ostrow
Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·
@whignewtons copyright is in the constitution. Art 1 section 8.8. And Breyer heard Lotus v Borland which foreshadowed O v G.
English
2
0
0
0
Jeffrey Ostrow
Jeffrey Ostrow@jeffostrow·
He’s been wanting to write this opinion since the mid 1990s when he heard Lotus at the 1st circuit, got promoted (it was rearguard at the circuit) and then he heard it again at scotus. Only to deadlock 4-4... he loves this issue.
English
0
0
0
0