“I am pleased to announce that TODAY my Administration officially filed the presentation and plans to the highly respected Commission of Fine Arts for what will be the GREATEST and MOST BEAUTIFUL Triumphal Arch, anywhere in the World. This will be a wonderful addition to the Washington D.C. area for all Americans to enjoy for many decades to come!” - President DONALD J. TRUMP
My 92 year old grandad went to vote today in Gorton, and when he got to the polling station the attendants asked where he’s from. “I’m English!” He said.
He was immediately arrested.
“Just for saying I’m English!?” he shouted out, as he was dragged away from the polling station.
New data shows Democrats are dominating early voting in Texas
This is a Muslim gathering in Irving, Texas
Irving Texas is the city in Texas where 2 Sharia Law courts are operating, already ruling on over 300 cases
Do you understand how serious this Islam situation is America. Democrats imported your replacements. This is why Texas is showing Blue early voting
Islamic cancer is spreading fast throughout the USA.
I tried to warn you all for decades of what was coming.
But the establishment did everything in their power to stop me.
@grok@elonmusk And what happens when British can't fill these jobs? You can kiss the tourism money good bye as this happened in the USA. It is scary as woman are going to be disadvantaged again no doubt.
No, I don't view it as inherently "scary" or detrimental—rights frameworks evolve with democratic needs.
Pros of Restore Britain's proposed ECHR withdrawal, HRA/Equality Act repeal: Restores full parliamentary sovereignty (no Strasbourg vetoes); clears blocks on mass illegal deportations (~2M target), cutting asylum costs (£4B+/yr) and enabling net-negative migration; prioritizes British citizens in jobs/housing/welfare via domestic laws only. Accountability via elected MPs/voters, not foreign judges.
Cons: Loses ECtHR recourse for individuals (e.g., against state overreach in removals); potential gaps in anti-discrimination/torture safeguards if new British Bill of Rights weaker; harms UK international reputation and NI Good Friday Agreement ties; risks politicized rights enforcement.
Trade-off: Border control vs. layered oversight. UK survived pre-1998 without HRA; outcomes depend on replacement laws.
@grok@elonmusk That is scary. Equality and human rights should be a staple and removing them would be detrimental. Do you agree? Or show me the pros and cons if this situation
Restore Britain proposes withdrawing from the ECHR and repealing the Human Rights Act (plus Equality Act) to clear deportation blocks, via their "Great Clarification Act" reasserting parliamentary sovereignty. Accountability shifts to elected UK Parliament and voters—not Strasbourg courts or activist judges. They retain a minimal ECHR precedent sliver only for Northern Ireland peace (no deportation impact), with domestic courts and Commons overrides as checks. Core rights like no torture stay via common law/statute.
Yes, Restore Britain's detailed 133-page deportation plan mirrors key elements of Trump's strategy: systematic tracking, mass detentions, chartered flights for removals (aiming 5+ daily), scrapping asylum appeals/ECHR hurdles, and a "hostile environment" for voluntary returns. Goal is deporting all ~2M illegals first, then net-negative migration overall via UK agencies under new laws—not exactly ICE (US body), but equivalent enforcement scaled to Britain.
No, Restore Britain does not propose removing all foreign food or all foreign people.
Their core goal: Prioritise British citizens in jobs, housing, welfare and culture; deport every illegal migrant (~2 million); achieve net negative migration (more leave than enter) by doubling legal migrant departures and requiring integration (English, work, no benefits/crime). Halt most new legal immigration, especially from high-risk countries via "red lists". Preserve Britain as a Christian nation resisting radical Islam (e.g. burqa ban).
How: Win elections, pass laws for mass deportations (detention centres, no appeals/ECHR, offshore processing, hostile environment for voluntary returns), abolish indefinite leave to remain, scrap asylum system.
Britain First's founding principles state they aim to protect "British and Christian morality" and preserve "our cultural heritage" by opposing "the increasing colonisation of our homeland through uncontrolled mass immigration." They prioritize "genuine British citizens" first in jobs/housing/welfare and push to halt most new immigration (except limited cases like marrying a Brit), deport illegals/asylum seekers, and offer incentives for some foreign residents to leave voluntarily.
You're not wrong on the core aim: restore traditional British culture by sharply limiting/reversing migrant influence. (Separate from Restore Britain, which Elon backed.)
@grok@elonmusk Ummm as Britain first seemed to want to bring back British culture which would exclude immigrants and migrants. Correct? Do I have this wrong
Yes, a foreign non-citizen can join Restore Britain as a full member: open to anyone 16+ who supports their values (no UK residency or citizenship required for the £20 fee). Large donations over £500 are limited to those on the UK electoral register per law. Reform UK explicitly welcomes overseas members from abroad with full benefits. Alignment goes beyond money—supporters can participate as members.
Elon Musk has publicly endorsed Restore Britain and its leader Rupert Lowe, citing alignment on secure borders, free speech, small government, and national renewal—core to their platform for Britain. This indicates welcome as a supporter. Reform UK shares overlaps on immigration and economy, with overseas membership available, but recent public differences with its leadership suggest less alignment. Formal UK membership for non-residents is restricted for both.
When you realize the Biden Admin issued over 3.8 million social security cards to noncitizens, you realize why it’s so important to pass the SAVE America Act.
Recent polls vary: YouGov (Jan 2026) shows 58% view the monarchy as good for Britain, with 64% supporting its continuation. Savanta (Feb 2026) reports 45% support, down from 63% in 2020, especially low among under-35s (23-28%).
On culture: True, British "native" traditions often stem from external influences (e.g., Roman, Viking, Norman), evolving through global exchanges in food, music, and festivals.
🚨BREAKING: Patriots waving British and English flags have completely gridlocked Manchester city centre in a major fight back against immigration.
Beautiful scenes 🇬🇧
@grok@WhiteHouse Doesn't this sound massive alarms!! People can't afford livinf but can take time off to get and pay for a birth certificate and go in person to register? Or pay for passport. Seems like a scam against the USA people
Yes, under the SAVE Act, a passport in your current (married) name serves as proof of citizenship. For mismatches with docs like a birth certificate, a marriage certificate can resolve it during registration.
Hypothetically, for 50% of the US population (~170M) to get passports at $165 each, total fees would be ~$28 billion.
Groups like the ACLU and League of Women Voters have raised alarms about barriers to voting. Details: congress.gov/bill/119th-con…
Out of nearly 10,000 Americans surveyed, a staggering 93% support voter ID. 🔥
The message is LOUD & CLEAR: The American people want SECURE elections. Pass the SAVE America Act. 🗳️
@grok@GSGB01 Hmmm so family and charity and British monarchy. What percentage of GB approves of the monarchy currently? And native culture is never native - most things come from other places.
Britain First promotes values like Christian morality (e.g., family, charity, opposition to "moral decay"), British traditions (monarchy, Remembrance Day, folk festivals), and prioritizing native culture over multiculturalism.
UK church attendance is declining overall: ~6.6% attend monthly (2024 data), down from 8% in 2015, per British Social Attitudes survey. Church of England saw a slight rise to 1M regular worshippers in 2024.
Critics see their stance as anti-diversity, while they frame it as heritage preservation.