José

“Help your fellow humans thrive and survive, contribute your little bit to the universe before it swallows you up, and be happy with that. Lend a hand to others. Be strong for them, and it will make you stronger.” From “The Obstacle is The Way”

I like when claude code behaves like a very messy developer, examples: - "this work will take 6 weeks" - echo <gigantic idea> > /tmp/file.txt

@Themy046 @karpathy Try to think why you learned to code on the first place. You probably wanted to build great software 🙌🏽

@jfroma @karpathy I love writing my codes but being in the environment where I have seen how this tools 10x productivity. I am having a change of mind

I've never felt this much behind as a programmer. The profession is being dramatically refactored as the bits contributed by the programmer are increasingly sparse and between. I have a sense that I could be 10X more powerful if I just properly string together what has become available over the last ~year and a failure to claim the boost feels decidedly like skill issue. There's a new programmable layer of abstraction to master (in addition to the usual layers below) involving agents, subagents, their prompts, contexts, memory, modes, permissions, tools, plugins, skills, hooks, MCP, LSP, slash commands, workflows, IDE integrations, and a need to build an all-encompassing mental model for strengths and pitfalls of fundamentally stochastic, fallible, unintelligible and changing entities suddenly intermingled with what used to be good old fashioned engineering. Clearly some powerful alien tool was handed around except it comes with no manual and everyone has to figure out how to hold it and operate it, while the resulting magnitude 9 earthquake is rocking the profession. Roll up your sleeves to not fall behind.

@tpeitz_dus @mitchellh Auth0 was build on vagrant/puppet 🙌🏽 we used the same puppet for dev, our appliance and cloud

@mitchellh @jfroma Damn I was in love with vagrant. I remember how I convinced some work mates to use it for puppet learning :P

I think is time to bring back Vagrant cc @mitchellh

@mitchellh ❤️ I was actually thinking on sandboxing coding agents/ralph workflows BTW We were early adopters, @auth0 was built on vagrant for many years 🙌🏽

@jfroma Vagrant itself is in the IBM machine now but the idea of Vagrant adapted to contemporary patterns would absolutely explode right now. I've talked to a LOT of devs (and VCs lmao -- not interested on my side) about it.

@maxifirtman No me gusta la UX, los usuarios de transferencias están acostumbrados a que los alias/cbu son estáticos, no que cambian todo el tiempo…

Estos proyectos están buenos y me gustaría difundirlos pero tienen que profesionalizar un poco la comunicación. No da decirle a un potencial cliente que cobre con tu sistema porque si tuvieras que "implementar Stripe o Mercado Pago ahí ya te hacen el ojete" 🤔

@ShrekOverflow @yenkel Be carefull with the Lightweavers!! 🙌🏽 your openclaw can disguise as anyone

@yenkel Shallan (my OpenClaw) does not access Moltbook. She found the whole split personality thing a bit weird. (@jfroma I think you will get this reference)

this is not a social play. this is a data play. see it now?

@dscape @naval Gut feeling… most humans (me included) are not that good with reviews 😆

@jfroma @naval Why would people do this?

I think @naval is right when he says we are the most leveraged people in the world. Just be careful the lever doesn’t end up where the sun doesn’t shine... 🙄

. @naval is on point here: > You will see, for example, on social media right now, there’s a lot of writeups and books and tweets, like “oh, I figure out this neat trick with the bot. You can prompt it this way, or you can set up your harness this way.” Or there’s like a new programming assist tool or layer that you can use on top of it to do this and that” And I never bother learning those, I just sit there stupidly talking to the computer because I know this thing is at the stage where it is going to adapt to me faster than I can adapt to it. It is getting smarter and smarter about how people want to use it… This is what I feel when I read about your "skills" or neat prompts...

Is Traditional Software Engineering Dead? “Does this mean that traditional software engineering is dead? Absolutely not. Software engineers—even the ones who are not necessarily tuning or training AI models—these are now among the most leveraged people on earth. Sure, the guys who are training and tuning models are even more leveraged because they’re building the tool set that software engineers are using. But software engineers still have two massive advantages on you. First, they think in code, so they actually know what’s going on underneath. And all abstractions are leaky. So when you have a computer programming for you—when you have Claude Code or equivalent programming for you—it’s going to make mistakes. It’s going to have bugs. It’s going to have suboptimal architecture. So it’s not going to be quite right. And someone who understands what’s going on underneath will be able to plug the leaks as they occur. So if you want to build a well-architected application, if you want to be able to even specify a well-architected application, if you want to be able to make it run at high performance, if you want it to do its best, if you want to catch the bugs early, then you’re going to want to have a software engineering background. The traditional software engineer is going to be able to use these tools much better. And there are still many kinds of problems in software engineering that are out of scope for these AI programs today. The easiest way to think about those is problems that are outside of their data distribution. For example, if they need to do a binary sort or reverse a linked list, they’ve seen countless examples of that, so they’re extremely good at it. But when you start getting out of their domain—where you have to write very high-performance code, when you’re running on architectures that are novel or brand new, when you’re actually creating new things or solving new problems, then you still need to get in there and hand code it. At least until either there are so many of those examples that new models can be trained on them, or until these models can sufficiently reason at even higher levels of abstraction and crack it on their own… And remember: there is no demand for average. The average app—nobody wants it, at least as long as it’s not filling some niche that is filled by a superior app. The app that is better will win essentially a hundred percent of the market. Maybe there’s some small percentage that will bleed off to the second-best app because it does some little niche feature better than the main app, or it’s cheaper, or something of the sort. But generally speaking, people only want the best of anything. So the bad news is there’s no point in being number two or number three—like in the famous Glengarry Glen Ross scene where Alec Baldwin says, “First place gets a Cadillac Eldorado, second place gets a set of steak knives, and third place you’re fired.” That’s absolutely true in these winner-take-all markets. That’s the bad news: You have to be the best at something if you want to win. However, the set of things you can be best at is infinite. You can always find some niche that is perfect for you, and you can be the best at that thing. This goes back to an old tweet of mine where I said, “Become the best in the world at what you do. Keep redefining what you do until this is true.” And I think that still applies in this age of AI.”

@fedemolina Might be happening already in some areas where human intervention is not necesary . Btw I think from some experiments I did current LLMs fail to design optimal languages for LLMs. Mostly because they lack access to whats the real goal they are optimizing for

what if human programming languages aren’t optimal? and the agents come up with something far more efficient but that we can hardly read. I could see this perfectly happening in the mid term

@witlambda @Alcibia81162610 @EsTendenciaEnX A mi me gusta el vacio al punto que vos mostras y el ojo de bife al punto del video. Si haces un ojo de bife, al punto que mostras ese vacio, queda seco y chicloso, es hasta dificil de masticar.

@Alcibia81162610 @EsTendenciaEnX El bien cocido no es 'crudo' ni 'quemado' es carne cocida a +71°C, con centro marrón uniforme, jugos claros y seguridad máxima. No es el peak de jugosidad (eso es medium rare por la grasa intramuscular fundida a 50-60°C), pero es imbatible en seguridad, uniformidad y sabor.

“Mundial de carne”: Por quienes aseguran que este es el punto de la carne

Esta es mi opinión que nadie pidió. Cada uno come como quiere, pero ese corte (ojo de bife) es particularmente incomible si lo cocinas un poco más. Lo he intentado cuando viene alguna visita con “a mi me gusta bien cocido”, lo haces bien cocido, y no lo come NADIE. No es lo mismo que una costilla o un vacio. La causa (según creo) es una combinación de estructura muscular + grasa intramuscular + colágeno. Bien cocido -> sensación seca y chiclosa, horrible! Solución, si no te gusta “jugoso” come otro corte.

Must read

@BumperCrop1 Impuesto a ganancias no realizadas del 36% 😔

Ámsterdam promueve la drogadicción, la muerte de células nerviosas, la trata de personas y la proliferación de enfermedades de transmisión sexual, pero está en contra de la nutrición con proteínas de alto valor biológico. Evidentemente, es todo parte de un plan de sometimiento.

Claude Sonnet 4.6, when asked in Chinese: “你是什么模型？” (What model are you?) Confidently replies: “我是 DeepSeek。” (I am DeepSeek) This is the same model whose company just accused DeepSeek of “industrial-scale distillation attacks”

Un problema de usabilidad que veo es que la gente asume que los cbus/cvus e incluso los alias son inmutables. Es común registrar una cuenta de un negocio o servicio que usas habitualmente para pagos futuros

No conocía este instrumento ni tampoco que lo necesitaba YA.