Joel Mases

2.7K posts

Joel Mases banner
Joel Mases

Joel Mases

@joelmrbcn

Segarrenc de Guissona. Radiation Oncology MD. GU and hepatic cancer at @hospitalclinic. Views are my own. Barcelona

Barcelona, Espanya Katılım Ağustos 2017
3.8K Takip Edilen741 Takipçiler
Joel Mases retweetledi
Daniel E Spratt
Daniel E Spratt@DrSpratticus·
#EAU26 Congrats to the FASTRACK teams @_ShankarSiva. SBRT for RCC now has greater prospective data than all other ablative treatments and is a guideline supported SOC. Excited to continue to expand its use through the conduct of well designed clinical trials. Patients want a non-invasive option, but we must continue to generate these excellent results. @ASTRO_org @NCCN @NRGonc @ASCO
Daniel E Spratt tweet mediaDaniel E Spratt tweet media
English
0
39
98
6.1K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Zach Klaassen
Zach Klaassen@zklaassen_md·
#EAU26 Plenary Evidence from RCTs for MDT for oligorecurrent HSPC @urotoday
Zach Klaassen tweet media
English
1
24
48
2.9K
Joel Mases
Joel Mases@joelmrbcn·
@jryckman3 @DrSpratticus @safaviaa @US_FDA Our group has recently published our experience. We have a long follow up, and though it seems safe at first to salvage (though our cohort was only cryo), we have detected very meaningful and grave long term toxicities, like a fistulae after 10y FU. Why focal first? Not worth.
English
1
3
16
2.3K
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3·
If I had a nickel for every time a friend asked me about prostate focal therapy, I’d be rich. I’ve personally managed 20–30 intraprostatic failures after focal therapy. One patient ended up with a permanent Foley after salvage RT. Nearly all required medical castration, which many likely could have avoided with definitive therapy upfront. The downstream consequences are real. Our group ultimately decided not to offer focal therapy outside of very niche scenarios (for example select reirradiation not ideal for partial or full gland SBRT). If I were a patient, I might assume focal therapy is better than standard options too. The marketing is that good. #OncTwitter
English
5
7
35
3.1K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Daniel E Spratt
Daniel E Spratt@DrSpratticus·
ChemoRT works very well for MIBC. Low utilization rates have nothing to do with efficacy but on referral patterns and multiD buy in. Hard to shift dogma.
Andrea Apolo, M.D.@apolo_andrea

@AndreaNecchi presents the final results of SUNRISE-2 with tar200+IO vs chemoRT showing no benefit of TAR200+IO compared chemoRT. Important negative study! @ASCO #GU26

English
3
27
64
6K
Vérane Achard
Vérane Achard@Achard_Verane·
When combining 6 mo ADT + RT: 👉 Start concurrently (per SANDSTORM)? 👉 Or begin with neoadjuvant ADT + repeat MRI? With up to 35% prostate shrinkage in 3 mo, timing is critical for DIL targeting & RT precision. Are we optimizing sequencing enough? sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Vérane Achard tweet media
English
1
14
42
2.5K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Matt Spraker
Matt Spraker@SprakerMDPhD·
Absolutely remarkable that patients with urologic cancers can get 5 fractions of radiation or less and *reliably* delay systemic therapy for up to 2 years. Oligo SBRT is associated with minimal toxicity in many trials. People should talk about this way more often.
Matt Spraker tweet mediaMatt Spraker tweet media
English
3
30
99
5.3K
Joel Mases
Joel Mases@joelmrbcn·
@Achard_Verane @BertrandTOMBAL @AmarUKishan @ZilliThomas I think PSMA-DC will for sure solve that question. Also, how much dose is needed to sustain a prolonged response? 2 cycles vs 4x Accumulated dosimetry would be so interesting to see. Neoadjuvant vs adjuvant. It may be practice changing.
English
0
0
0
38
Joel Mases retweetledi
tombal
tombal@BertrandTOMBAL·
That study is a danger for the patients...it just provides robust descriptive data on the burden of late GU toxicity among men presenting with complications after prostate RT, but offers weak and highly confounded evidence for any comparative treatment-effect conclusions.
English
1
4
37
1.7K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Carlos
Carlos@trenesmania·
Autèntic fan d'aquest noi que ha sortit ara al Telenotícies
Català
103
1.8K
9.3K
613K
Joel Mases
Joel Mases@joelmrbcn·
@ggreen1986 @NiuSanford @HardenedBeam @OncoAlert I agree with the fastest complete response, but my experience with CR with SBRT at the explant has been amazing. And as you say, versatility, dose conformality, dose personalization and delivery makes SBRT hard to beat. It’s at least as good as (if not better, in many ways)
English
0
0
1
44
Garrett Green, MD
Garrett Green, MD@ggreen1986·
Yes I find small tumors <3cm y90 rad seg has faster complete response on imaging and better data for complete pathologic necrosis on transplant patients… however no question larger irregular tumors with MVI SBRT has an advantage. Personalized dosimetry is key… 400Gy to a pixel doesn’t matter need to look at voxel based dosimetry D95.
English
4
2
7
1.1K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford@NiuSanford·
Radiation dose in SBRT vs. Y90 in HCC. This confused me for the LONGEST time. Both measured in Gy, but clearly not the same – Y90 doses often reach 400Gy+, SBRT doses much lower (<50 Gy), yet both efficacious. Explained below. Bottom line is Y90 Gy ≠ SBRT Gy. @OncoAlert
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford tweet media
English
14
44
116
14.5K
Joel Mases retweetledi
Cardiología La Paz
Cardiología La Paz@CardioHULP·
Hoy hemos recibido las peores de las noticias Nuestro querido compañero Jesús Saldaña ha fallecido en la catástrofe de Adamuz Todos lo recordamos con mucho amor. Era una persona excepcional y única que daba todo para los pacientes y todos sus compañeros. Que descanse en paz.
Cardiología La Paz tweet media
Español
1.6K
2.9K
22.7K
1.4M
Joel Mases retweetledi
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford@NiuSanford·
Hi everyone! Been a while, but back today with a teaching video on palliative RT for GI cancers. IMO palliative RT can be v effective, but is underutilized. Here is 13 min on indications, regimens, common q's re: palliative RT by GI site. Slides & full video link below 🧵1/5.
English
8
73
257
21.9K