Jonas

242 posts

Jonas banner
Jonas

Jonas

@jonascalimeris

I'm an easy person

Katılım Şubat 2022
74 Takip Edilen35 Takipçiler
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@AtxaTrades @BRICSinfo The US has executed 42 prisoners in 2025 under the death penalty. Crazy to image right?
English
0
0
0
4
ATXA
ATXA@AtxaTrades·
@BRICSinfo And some socialist countries defending them. Crazy to imagine
English
2
0
4
363
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇮🇷 UN says Iran has executed at least 21 people since the start of the war.
English
256
265
3.5K
203.7K
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
Prayer works. Information is important. Tables do turn. God is good all the time.
English
0
0
0
4
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
I tried to make more money and ended up losing what I already had. It taught me that not every opportunity is worth the risk especially when it sounds too good to be true
English
0
0
0
5
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@CryptoIntelPlug @BRICSinfo How are they neutral? 3 days ago ATACMS was fired from there. So make it make sense to me how they neutral?. are they not aware that their air spaces are going to be used for an attack?
English
0
0
3
50
Crypto Intel Plug Ξ
Crypto Intel Plug Ξ@CryptoIntelPlug·
@BRICSinfo So now the war is hitting neutral countries who aren't even fighting. Either Tehran's aim is off, or they're testing how much collateral damage the world will tolerate.
English
2
0
2
669
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇮🇷🇰🇼 Iranian drone attack damages radar system at Kuwait's international airport.
English
179
1.1K
9.4K
283.9K
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@stcsolutions @MarioNawfal Funding the group you're fighting to keep the chaos profitable. You owe me a follow and I will do the same
English
0
0
0
2
Samuel OLAFUSI
Samuel OLAFUSI@stcsolutions·
@MarioNawfal This is a heavy accusation. Also it's not logical? Can anyone make it make sense to me?
English
11
0
2
4.7K
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@KMatallic @BRICSinfo Their military alliance It's all based on shared interests. Not a Legal obligation or Automatic/ expected military response in that case is not attack one = attack both. So that is the reason Russia will not show like that except you nukes any Syria or Iran. And that is WW
English
0
0
0
18
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇰🇵🇷🇺 Kim Jong Un says North Korea "will always be with Moscow."
BRICS News tweet mediaBRICS News tweet media
English
205
997
12.2K
176K
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@KMatallic @BRICSinfo Collective defense is An attack on one is an attack on both. In this case no need to ask for help, because HELP is automatically on the way as it is designed. Russia and North Korea Recently signed a treaty that comes closest to collective defense. means you can ask for help
English
1
0
0
56
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@Bet38961207 @BRICSinfo Iran and Russia as strong partnership based on shared interests not guarantee mutual defense. question is those Russia share info to them in this war. The only way Russia or China can get in is when someone nukes Iran.
English
0
0
0
28
Berry
Berry@Bet38961207·
@BRICSinfo Iran also throught they had friends, until the war started!
English
1
0
0
349
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@KMatallic @BRICSinfo Is there a difference betwee a strategic partnership agreement and guarantee mutual defense. so ask yourself all of those countries you called out which of them has guaranteed mutual defense?. NK and RU have Formal strategic & defense alliance as of now. All are not the same
English
1
0
5
252
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@KMatallic @BRICSinfo Why are you people talking without sense? First you should ask is what type of alliance does Russia has with those countries and how deep the military alliance is. A traditional ally relationship does not mean your war is my war. Understand it first
English
0
0
0
211
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@thetect0nic @MarioNawfal He wanted the Hormuz be opened in 48 hours now it’s okay to be closed for another 5 days + it’s obvious that he took Iranian threat seriously and is backing up but doesn’t want to signal the weakness of USA.
English
0
0
1
47
The Tectonic
The Tectonic@thetect0nic·
Iran's Foreign Ministry: "We deny any negotiations." One of them is lying! But note what Trump confirmed regardless of which version is true: "Why would they want that?" is the correct question. The answer is the same whether Iran called or not: Because the alternative was humanitarian catastrophe at a scale that would have ended any possibility of a negotiated exit. The threat worked or the talks worked. The result is the same five-day pause. The distinction matters for the history books. It doesn't change what tomorrow morning almost looked like.
English
2
0
0
3.5K
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇺🇸🇮🇷Trump: "Tomorrow morning, we were expected to blow up their largest electric generating plants that cost over $10 billion to build. 1 shot. It's gone. It collapses. Why would they want that? So they called. I didn't call. They want to make a deal."
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

Journalist: "If these talks go well and you reach a ceasefire agreement with Iran, do you believe Israel would abide by that agreement?" 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Trump: "I think Israel will be very happy with what we have."

English
236
330
2.5K
655.5K
Tinder
Tinder@Tinder·
the way the gc goes feral when someone sends a ‘Share My Date’ link
English
891
51
286
817.6K
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
Real growth comes from humility and the willingness to learn.
English
0
0
1
12
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
When you’re teaching someone and they suddenly start acting like they already know everything, rushing ahead and no longer listening, sometimes the best thing you can do is step back. You can’t guide someone who believes they already know more than the person trying to help them.
English
2
0
1
15
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@PressSec When was this post?
Jonas tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Karoline Leavitt
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec·
There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19

After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.

English
31.9K
14.9K
59.1K
13.1M
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
@ladie_jaded @ABDU___L1 @PressSec If he's from Nigeria is that an issue? Aren't you ashamed of your country? Silly, There are always receipts.
Jonas tweet media
English
0
0
0
20
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says the United States no longer needs NATO.
BRICS News tweet mediaBRICS News tweet media
English
1.9K
3.6K
22.5K
5.3M
Jonas
Jonas@jonascalimeris·
🤲🏻
Jonas tweet media
QME
0
0
0
16