Jonathan Eppers

9.5K posts

Jonathan Eppers banner
Jonathan Eppers

Jonathan Eppers

@jonathaneppers

founder: tech, real estate and cpg

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Eylül 2009
591 Takip Edilen4K Takipçiler
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Michael McNair
Michael McNair@michaeljmcnair·
China looked at the lessons of 20th century great power conflict and drew the conclusion that military power alone doesn't determine outcomes, upstream industrial capacity does. The Allies won because of overwhelming industrial might. Japan and Germany lost because they lacked critical industrial inputs. Starved of oil, they were forced into gambles that cost them the war…Japan attacking Pearl Harbor to seize the oil in the Dutch East Indies, Germany marching to the Caucasus to take the Baku oil fields. Input scarcity doesn't just weaken you. It steers your decisions. It pulls decisions away from the optimal plan and toward the necessary plan. China learned this lesson and decided to be the one holding the chokepoints. By embedding itself so deeply into the upstream supply chains that feed American military production, a conflict would trigger Western industrial paralysis and neuter its ability to fight a long war. But the chokehold only works if the West doesn't rectify its supply chain vulnerabilities before China is ready to move on Taiwan. So China's central strategic requirement was to delay Western recognition of the threat for as long as possible. Thus, China's entire foreign policy posture becomes oriented around appearing non-threatening. And it works because it aligns with the economic incentives of Western elites who benefit from cheap inputs and profitable trade. The cost of denial is kept artificially low. Raising the alarm looks like paranoia or protectionism when cheap goods keep flowing and no shots are being fired. The administration is now racing to unwind its supply chain vulnerability before the conflict window opens. But that takes years, and they face significant inertia, both domestically and among allies who remain naively blind to the risk. China knows this. So their strategy is to keep the West sleepwalking. Which means they can’t show their hand. If China comes into direct military conflict with the US in order to defend a proxy, the West wakes up. The inertia collapses. The reshoring and remilitarization that China spent decades trying to prevent happens on an emergency timeline. But the US finally realized it could use this against them. Since China can’t show its hand until it's ready to move on Taiwan, the US realized that it can turn China's greatest strategic asset, the pacifist disguise, into a structural trap. They cannot take overtly aggressive action without triggering the Western industrial mobilization their entire strategy depends on preventing. So the US can eliminate their proxies and China can’t respond without destroying the disguise. Maduro removed. Cuba strangled. Now Iran. Beijing must decide if defending the proxy is worth waking the West up? And the answer keeps being no. Until China’s window to move on Taiwan opens, the pacifist posture that enabled its chokeholds constrains their response to US actions. Everything the US is doing right now is a race to be ready before that moment arrives. Clear the proxies. Arm the allies. Break the chokeholds. And build new ones of its own.
English
240
955
4.8K
1.1M
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
The USA now produces more oil then Saudi Arabia And Russia combined
Breaking911 tweet media
English
266
1.6K
9.2K
1.2M
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Knocking down Iran makes it much easier to contain China. It deprives them of an important partner and a lot of oil.
Crémieux tweet media
English
217
336
4K
683.8K
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Governor Tate Reeves
Governor Tate Reeves@tatereeves·
This seems like a good time to remind you that a black student in Mississippi is 2.5X more likely to read proficiently by 4th grade than if he or she lived in California. We would be happy to send one of our reading coaches to assist you, @GavinNewsom. Learning is a lifelong journey, and you might achieve some of the gains that our black fourth graders have. Incidentally, one nice feature of increased literacy is that you do not have to fall back on vulgarity to seem passionate. Let me know!
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom

You didn’t give a shit about the President of the United States of America posting an ape video of President Obama or calling African nations shitholes — but you’re going to call me racist for talking about my lifelong struggle with dyslexia? Spare me your fake fucking outrage, Sean.

English
1.4K
6.4K
48.2K
3.3M
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
I hope we never find life on other planets because there's no doubt that the U.S. Government will start sending them money!
English
15.7K
44.4K
168.3K
0
Jonathan Eppers
Jonathan Eppers@jonathaneppers·
@hastamat That beverage is insanely hard, and without a ton of capital, it's impossible to succeed was the key takeaway.
English
0
0
0
14
Jonathan Eppers
Jonathan Eppers@jonathaneppers·
Got to chat with the CEO of Oatly. That was quite cool!
English
2
0
2
109
Jonathan Eppers retweetledi
Rumi
Rumi@rumilyrics·
Believe that things can suddenly and miraculously change in your favor.
English
102
481
3.9K
56.4K
Jonathan Eppers
Jonathan Eppers@jonathaneppers·
It is extremely courageous to speak this when the fear of intimation is so strong. More must speak out before it's too late.
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

Go to Luton. Go to Rochdale. Go to Bradford. Go to Tower Hamlets. Jim Ratcliffe is right - it has been colonised by immigrants. That’s just a fact. No point pussyfooting around it. Streets and streets of entire families unable to speak in English, not working, not contributing - living under parallel legal systems. It’s not even multiculturalism in some of these areas. There is one culture - Islam. They do not want to live by the same rules as the rest of us. They choose not to be policed as the rest of us. So they’re not. What has that led to? We all know. Britain increasingly resembles the third world. And with demographic changes, birthrates and immigration transforming our country as they are? That is a process which will only accelerate unless drastic action is taken. I speak to MPs, plenty agree with me in private. They are, however, unwilling to say so publicly. That needs to change, urgently. The backlash for stating these obvious facts is aggressive, so MPs don’t do it. The intimidation works, it’s effective. But I don’t need the job, I don’t need the money. I’m just going to carry on telling the truth. Let's continue to kick the shit out of the Overton window - that is step one. Ratcliffe is right. And I respect him for having the balls to say it.

English
0
0
0
74
Jonathan Eppers
Jonathan Eppers@jonathaneppers·
Fascinating
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens

The math behind this is actually really fascinating, and it explains why the Left has to rely so much on institutional capture and mass migration to remain alive. The children of Liberals adopt their worldview 89% of the time, while Conservatives see their kids adopt theirs 81% of the time. But this advantage on the Left is dwarfed by the fact that they’re essentially an anti-catalyst movement. We know that women have kids at a higher rate than men across the board, but Conservative men have kids at a higher rate than even Liberal women. This means that ~59% of Conservatives become parents, while just ~31% of Liberals do. That’s almost a 2X fertility advantage. And when you multiply those numbers by the ideological detainment rate on both sides, you see that: 59% x .81 = 47.8 31% x .89 = 27.6 So that rounds to a minimum of 48 Conservative-aligned children per 100 Conservative adults, compared to a minimum of just 28 Liberal-aligned children per 100 Liberal adults. Conservatives are reproducing their worldview at ~70% higher rate per adult than liberals. And this is a minimum estimate because all our math here assumes that both the Conservable and Liberal families had only one kid, but we know Conservatives on average have much larger families. The Left can’t compete with this organically, so they have to essentially steal the children of Conservatives through the education and media system (which they’ve all ideologically hijacked) and import new voters who will make up for their own collapsing birthrates. If you ended all immigration and dismantled their dominance over education, the Left would be extinct in 20 years.

English
0
0
0
55