Mr_KiJOt3c

@TheBHentel Jordan-Kobe-Lebron.

I’m not tapped into soccer somebody explain Messi’s greatness to me in hoop terms.

@BBGreatMoments Chipper

When I say MLB player who spent their entire career with one team, who’s the first name that comes to mind?

@GordoDan_ @tipitoenojado Qui dicis lici. Leo no es Miridini

SI SI MUY LINDO LO DE MESSI PERO YO NO ME OLVIDO CUANDO LE DIO LA MANO A TRUMP Y NO SE PRONUNCIÓ ACERCA DE LA LEY DE HUMEDALES

MESSI 🫡🐐👏🏾👏🏾

Compartí este Messi bombero y ganamos el Mundial por segunda vez consecutiva

@EtiquetaNegra44 Así es, Robert horry ganó 7 anillos, según ese argumento, entonces es mejor que Jordan-Kobe y Lebron?

La cultura del anillo seguramente sea injusta para valorar a muchos jugadores que jamás lo consiguieron. ¿Es Jalen Brunson superior a cualquier jugador que no ganó el título? ¿Está por encima de los Malone, Stockton, Nash, Ewing, Barkley, Iverson y un largo etc? Pues no lo creo, conseguir una joya no te convierte automáticamente en el mejor. Es difícil comparar épocas distintas y rivales diferentes, pero ganar el anillo es el fin último, y Brunson lo ha logrado de una forma brillante y dominando como los mejores. Su quinto partido fue jordanesco, estuvo a la altura de los mejores de la historia, y sobre eso no existe ningún debate.

@damzychillin Pirlo

Zlatan Ibrahimovic aside Cite a player who has played for these three clubs. You can’t.

Ni un rubio en la selección de Haití. ¡Racistas!

Te vas a quejar en cada cooling break? Sí

Best liquidity pools to use for the draw on liquidity, bias and potential reversal points: 1. Previous Days High 2. Previous Days Low 3. Previous Weeks High 4. Previous Weeks Low 5. London High 6. London Low 7. Asian Range High 8. Asian Range Low 9. Equal Highs 10. Equal Lows

Insisto. TRUST THE F*** PLAN

Tren de Aragua has been DECAPITATED.

@KalshiHoops Bench

Playoff Points in their Rookie Season: 300 — Dylan Harper 294 — LeBron, Carmelo, Bosh & Wade Combined 288 — Entire 2024 Draft Class Combined

”Los mejores del mundo no son los mejores porque ganen todos los puntos. Son los mejores porque saben que van a perder una y otra vez, y han aprendido a lidiar con ello.” - Roger Federer Necesitas ver este video (son solo 2 minutos)👇

Imagina ceder minas de oro y hacer concesiones con extranjeros dentro de tu propio territorio por un ratico más de ropa cara y plástico importado. Son los indios con espejos del s.XXI.

This “ORB” Trading Strategy Is Practically Foolproof… My best year is $842,000 My biggest payout is $50,000 My win rate stays above 70-80% I’ve been trading for 10 years now I’ve tried everything over the past 10 years. I finally realized this ACTUALLY works. A thread 🧵

"Trading takes 5-10 years to learn" is a lie invented by people who took 5-10 years because they learned wrong… The actual learning curve when done correctly: 6-12 months MAX. Here's why most traders take a decade (and why you don't have to): What most traders do: Year 1: Try 15 different strategies from YouTube Year 2: Buy 3 courses, try those strategies Year 3: "Combine" everything into Frankenstein system Year 4: Blow account, start over with "simpler" approach Year 5: Finally realize indicators don't work Year 6: Discover price action, start from scratch Year 7: Get consistent for 2 months, then overtrade Year 8: Blow account, take 6 month break Year 9: Return with "discipline," finally profitable Year 10: Actually consistent That's 10 years of cycling through garbage before accidentally finding what works. What fast learners do: Month 1-2: Study ONE concept (liquidity: internal and external) Month 3-4: Mark up 200 charts, identify pattern without trading Month 5-6: Paper trade, prove edge exists Month 7-8: Small live account, prove psychology holds Month 9-10: Scale to prop firm, prove consistency Month 11-12: Stack accounts, prove scalability Same endpoint. 10x faster. The difference isn't talent. It's path. Why the 10-year path is so common: The trading education industry makes money keeping you confused. If you figured it out in 6 months, you wouldn't buy the $997 course. Then the $2,497 mentorship. Then the $4,997 mastermind. They NEED you struggling. They NEED you trying indicator combinations that don't work. They NEED you to believe it's "supposed to take years." So they teach complexity. 47 indicators. 12 strategies. "Market conditions" for each one. The truth: Markets have done the same thing forever. Sweep liquidity, fill imbalances, target opposite liquidity. That's the game. One concept. But "one concept" doesn't sell $4,997 masterminds. What you actually need to learn: 1) External liquidity = swing highs/lows (where stops sit) 2) Internal liquidity = fair value gaps (where orders didn't fill) 3) Price sweeps external → fills internal → targets opposite external 4) Higher timeframe bias + lower timeframe entry = edge 5) 3:1 minimum reward/risk = math that works over time That's genuinely it. Everything else is noise designed to extend your learning curve and their income. The 10-year traders had bad maps. Not bad brains. Get a good map and you don't need 10 years. You need 6-12 months and the discipline to not get distracted by every new indicator some guru is selling. (DM "SYSTEM" for fully private 1-on-1 coaching - this is a high ticket offer, i only take 1-2 traders at a time)

@marce_mej1a Done

Ya perdió el Arsenal, ahora solo falta que pierda OKC.

go pull up the 6AM candle on your chart right now this one candle predicts the entire New York session direction and almost nobody uses it a guy in my discord called 14 out of 15 trading days correctly last month using only this here's the exact system: THE 6AM REVERSAL SIGNATURE: at 6AM EST, institutions show their hand they either: - push price into a key level (reversal incoming) - expand away from a level (continuation day) the 6AM candle tells you WHICH STEP 1: mark yesterday's high and low STEP 2: at 6AM, watch where price trades relative to those levels STEP 3: if 6AM sweeps a level but CLOSES back inside the range = reversal day STEP 4: if 6AM expands and closes BEYOND the level = trend day that's it. EXAMPLES: 6AM sweeps yesterday's high, closes back below it → sell the rip at 9:30 6AM sweeps yesterday's low, closes back above it → buy the dip at 9:30 6AM breaks high and closes above with momentum → only look for longs most traders show up at 9:30 with no bias they're "reacting to price action" aka gambling smart traders showed up at 6AM they already know the direction the 9:30 open is just their entry window THIS IS THE EDGE: institutions set up the move between 6-9:30 retail shows up at 9:30 and provides the exit liquidity you can either BE the liquidity or you can TAKE the liquidity the 6AM candle tells you which side you're on go backtest it. 30 days. track the results. you'll never trade blind again free discord in bio (DM "SYSTEM" for fully private 1-on-1 coaching - this is a high ticket offer, i only take 1-2 traders at a time)

half of every move on NQ is a trap and you keep entering on that exact half not because your setup is bad not because the market is rigged not because you have bad luck because you don't know which half of the move you're standing in 95% of traders enter wherever the setup prints. the 5% who get paid only enter from one specific half of the leg. same setup. opposite half. opposite outcome here's what nobody teaches you: every move from a low to a high is split into two halves. a discount half and a premium half. and price treats them completely differently the rule: if you're bullish, you only buy from the discount half. the bottom 50% of the leg if you're bearish, you only sell from the premium half. the top 50% of the leg enter from the wrong half and you're not trading. you're providing exit liquidity for the institution that entered from the right one that's the entire edge. one line. you've been ignoring it for 2 years here's how to mark it in 10 seconds: take the most relevant swing low and swing high of the current move. drag a fib or just eyeball the midpoint. that 50% line is the equilibrium. below it is discount. above it is premium. done. now let me show you the three scenarios: SCENARIO 1: bullish bias, price pulls back into discount H4 is bullish. real body candle up, small wicks. price has displaced higher and is now retracing. you do nothing until price trades below the 50% of the leg. the moment it enters the discount half, you start looking for your entry trigger. FVG, order block, whatever you use. but ONLY in discount. a perfect setup in the premium half is not a trade. it's bait. you enter in discount. stop below the swing low. target the previous high. you just bought where institutions buy. SCENARIO 2: bearish bias, price rallies into premium H4 is bearish. real body candle down. price is now rallying back up against the trend. you do nothing until price trades above the 50% of the leg the second it enters the premium half, you hunt your short trigger. you fade the rally from premium. you do not short in discount. shorting in discount is how you get stopped on the next leg up before the real move down you enter in premium. stop above the swing high. target the previous low SCENARIO 3: price is sitting at equilibrium right at the 50%. no man's land. this is where 95% of traders take their worst trades. the move could go either way from equilibrium and they enter anyway because they're bored. you do nothing. equilibrium is not a trade. you wait for price to commit to a half. then you act. the model behind all of this: institutions buy low and sell high. literally. they accumulate in discount and distribute in premium. when you buy in premium, you're buying exactly where they're selling to you. when you sell in discount, you're selling exactly where they're buying from you. you've been taking the other side of the institution every time you ignored which half you were in. how i use this every morning: mark the current leg. low to high. draw the 50%. check the H4 bias. bullish + price in discount = hunt longs bearish + price in premium = hunt shorts anything else = wait or close the laptop that's it. one line on the chart changes everything. a trader in my discord had a 44% win rate taking good setups in bad locations. added the premium/discount filter. nothing else changed. same setups. same risk. win rate went to 63% in 6 weeks. he didn't get better at finding setups. he stopped taking them in the wrong half of the move. most traders spend years perfecting their entry trigger while ignoring the only thing that determines whether the trigger works: location. the setup tells you what. the half tells you where. without where, what is a coin flip. draw the line. pick your half. stop donating to the other side. or keep entering wherever the setup prints and wondering why your textbook entries keep failing. your choice free discord in bio (DM "SYSTEM" for fully private 1-on-1 coaching - this is a high ticket offer, i only take 1-2 traders at a time)