kiwitrades

long ago confirmed macro downtrend getting towards the 8 weeks of consolidation, writing is on the wall $BTC very high conviction play

@swarmister 8 bit? must be cybertruck

Guys, I'm in the process of buying a new car. It takes a long time here (all the red tape and a ton of damn taxes), so I haven't been posting as much I've been doing nothing but this for the last three days. So, what kind of car is your Russian friend driving now? You can kind of see my car in the photo, haha

@CCPool_Daniel @TedPillows yeah but ted is right and youre a retard daniel

@TedPillows You were telling everyone at the VERY LOW to get ready for a crash to $45,000, but apparently you now magically bought the lows when we hit 80k. Right.... These influencers are such big scammers.

Selling 50% of my spot $BTC that I bought 2 weeks ago. This feels like a good moment. As said in that post between $78-80k. The other 50% around 82k.

@goranXBT halo

Easy its doom eternal, nothing even comes close

2500 = 9500 $ETH

common bera market refreshments

happy sunday discord.com/channels/56246…

.

felatio

felatio

felatio

@Dexerto fire judges reinstate his win

A competitive Pokemon GO player got disqualified after winning the Orlando Regional Championship due to his celebration

felatio

We are going down again I believe 🐻🧸🐻‍❄️🐨🐼 $btc #bitcoin

@TFTC21 another actor in the space is a ginnergaffot, who couldve seen it coming

Folks, we told you this was coming, and today the mask is fully off. A couple weeks back we reported, based on solid sources, that Coinbase was quietly lobbying to kill a real de minimis tax exemption for Bitcoin while pushing one that applied only to stablecoins like USDC. We laid out the clear incentives in our deep dive. Coinbase made 1.35 billion dollars in stablecoin revenue last year, up 48 percent year over year, almost entirely from yield on the Treasuries backing USDC. A proper Bitcoin de minimis would let people spend sats on everyday purchases without triggering taxable events on every transaction. That directly competes with their centralized yield machine. We called it what it was. Policy that protects Coinbase’s float rather than advancing neutral Bitcoin adoption. Brian Armstrong pushed back hard. He called our reporting totally false and misinformation while insisting he was personally lobbying for Bitcoin de minimis. Some accused us of lying or spreading rumors. We stood firm. We offered to have Brian on the TFTC podcast to clear the air. We waited. Now the latest draft from Reps. Horsford and Max Miller on the updated PARITY Act framework has dropped. It confirms exactly what we warned about. It gives a de minimis exemption to stablecoins but leaves Bitcoin out entirely. It keeps the punishing double taxation on Bitcoin mining fully intact while carving out relief for passive validation, basically staking. This is not an oversight or sloppy drafting. It abandons any pretense of technology neutrality and deliberately picks winners. Dollar-pegged stables and staking get the breaks, while actual Bitcoin usage as money and Proof-of-Work mining get kneecapped. Without de minimis for Bitcoin, every small Lightning payment or sat transaction still forces cost-basis tracking and IRS headaches. Paying your plumber in sats or grabbing lunch with Bitcoin remains a taxable event. Stablecoins, being pegged and low-volatility, get an exemption they barely need. The real beneficiary is protecting that massive USDC reserve float and the yield it generates. Meanwhile, American Bitcoin miners, already operating in one of the toughest, most capital- and energy-intensive industries, face continued double taxation while staking gets a pass. That is not neutral policy. It is industrial policy against domestic Bitcoin mining at a time when we should be leaning into energy abundance and securing the hardest monetary network. The Bitcoin Policy Institute is releasing a full statement soon, and we fully back the call for strong community pushback. Every Bitcoiner needs to contact their reps and make it politically radioactive to sideline Bitcoin while handing carve-outs to stables and staking. This language slows real adoption, entrenches custodians, and weakens American Bitcoin infrastructure. We weren’t lying. Our sources weren’t lying. The draft proves the reporting was on target. Those who rushed to call it misinformation owe the community some honest reflection. Brian, if you’re still open to that conversation, the invitation stands. Come on the podcast. No spin, just walk us through how this draft lines up with your stated support for Bitcoin de minimis. The mic is warm. This fight isn’t over. Bitcoin doesn’t need permission, but bad policy can delay sovereign adoption and punish the miners securing the network. We’re here to protect the protocol and the right of individuals to use sound money without turning every transaction into a compliance nightmare. Stay sovereign. Stack sats. Use Bitcoin as money anyway. Call your reps today.

stretch your anus $STRC $MSTR $BTC

@OldEBT prayers sent, many many prayers

@jpd21100 i only own nfts which is worse

always stuns me how people continue to hold assets long term knowing they don't have any inherent value

@OldEBT sell your eth

@jpd21100 i’m that guy

@bull_genius he's him

judging by my observations of ct tl sentiment and also my own this would roughly represent the currently most hated outcome

@jpd21100 Bottega

$BTC Fractal Update We are seeing a perfect correlation, the only differences are the pace of events and minor deviations in the structure, which do not alter the overall picture. You control only your emotions and your position size; everything else depends on the market structure. I have said repeatedly that there is no global reversal here. The only thing that could actually reverse the market is a consolidation on the 4H timeframe above 88k, which looks practically impossible (But mfs were still shouting that we would rise even higher) LOWER