Juno AZ

286 posts

Juno AZ

Juno AZ

@junovzer

Uptrend is my life

BTC 500K$ Katılım Mayıs 2019
712 Takip Edilen199 Takipçiler
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@Rubicullus You deployed without testing its impact, and it ruined everything.
English
1
0
0
72
Rubicullus
Rubicullus@Rubicullus·
We owe everyone the complete picture, not a soundbite. Here it is, and every number below is verifiable on chain. 1. What we were building Rubicullus is an OlympusDAO style reserve protocol. We set out to modernize the OHM model: real treasury backing, bonds that bring in assets, staking that compounds. We believed in it and the team was bullish the whole way. Here is the hard lesson. The OHM (3,3) model is built to reward staking and bonding, and it is structurally unfriendly to selling at any level. It assumes people lock and hold. It does not provide healthy exit liquidity, so the moment real selling meets a thin pool, the price has nothing to catch it. That is a property of the model itself, not a bug we introduced, and it is the core reason the chart did what it did. 2. What happened Supply expands through bonds. In a short window supply grew from a fraction of one token to about 39.75 RHM while the trading pool held only a few hundred dollars of depth. Expanding supply that fast into a pool that thin, inside a model that punishes selling, means the per token price cannot hold. It ran far beyond anything the treasury actually backed, then it corrected hard. What you saw on the chart was that correction. It was mechanics, not someone taking money out. 3. What did NOT happen The team did not sell. The tokens the team held, it still holds. Nothing was dumped. The LP was not pulled. The liquidity position is time locked on chain until July 2027. Nobody, including the team, can withdraw it. Locker 0x61b9cB76e625beF85929066dEC9606Ad99Fe4cB2, position #88163. The treasury was not drained. Reserves and staking are intact and solvent 1 to 1. If this were a rug, the LP would be gone and the treasury empty. Both are still here. Verify it yourself. 4. What we did about it Paused all bonds so no new supply can be minted. Deployed a trustless, on chain backing redemption. Every RHM converts to its fixed pro rata share of the treasury WETH, the same value per token for everyone, first or last. It depends on no price and no pool, only the real assets held. 5. How to claim your backing Rate: about 0.0274 WETH (about $49) per RHM Claim page: rubicullus.com Redemption contract: 0x1f0f0f3e76a62b80bc4ddc83cbacd0a280c3bc51 Connect your wallet, enter your RHM, receive your WETH. Optional and permissionless. 6. Accountability This is on us for launching a seller hostile model on a supply to liquidity base it could not carry. I own that fully. I would rather hand real value back honestly than pretend a broken chart is fine. The redemption is live so anyone who held can get the treasury real backing, transparently, right now. To everyone who believed and is still here, thank you. Verify everything. The next one gets built right.
English
9
0
2
549
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@Rubicullus What about that 0.01 ETH bond? Is it yours or someone else's? If it belongs to a user, that's worrying. They hold 11% of the current circulating supply.
English
1
0
1
131
Rubicullus
Rubicullus@Rubicullus·
We want to address the 40% wallet directly. That wallet came from an early team snipe. The team did not intentionally set out to capture that much supply, but the outcome still matters and we understand why people are watching it closely. So, we are taking concrete steps. An additional 22% of total supply has been locked here: robinhoodchain.blockscout.com/address/0x0917… The remaining 18% will be staked and left unmoved. That means: 40% wallet → 22% locked → 18% staked / unmoved → no active selling from that allocation We care more about seeing Rubicullus reach its full potential on Robinhood Chain than optimizing around a short-term team position. We’ll keep addressing concerns directly as they come up.
English
9
9
25
3.7K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@BitQua The chart is just for the writer's satisfaction, so where was your 140k in 2025 on this chart?
English
0
0
0
192
BitQuant
BitQuant@BitQua·
$250 in 2015. $4K in 2020. $16K in 2022. $63K in 2026. The same opportunity. The same risk. The same reward.
BitQuant tweet media
English
48
70
978
63.3K
mukricuan
mukricuan@mukricuan1577·
@Humanityprot Hey, asshole, can you explain all this? What's happening to my money? If you have good intentions, please fix this onchain bnb.😭🥹
mukricuan tweet mediamukricuan tweet media
English
17
0
11
5K
Humanity
Humanity@Humanityprot·
While we work on a recovery plan for everyone affected, we want you to see exactly what we see. We’ve set up a live tracker of the exploiter’s addresses and downstream transfers so our community can follow the situation in real time: transparency.humanity.org
English
414
113
320
155.4K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@0xDeantoshi Some markets have very high APY rates, but when I try to loop through them, it throws an error. Also, the borrow interest rates displayed in some markets are incorrect? eg: PT-apyUSD-18JUN2026
English
1
0
0
50
Deantoshi
Deantoshi@0xDeantoshi·
Here are 2 primed stablecoin farms! PRIME/PYUSD: +23.16% Zap stables into the PYUSD Sentora PRIME Main Vault for a simple +6.94% One-click zap into these farms from any* starting asset on Yieldz. io ! Follow me for future strats!
Deantoshi tweet mediaDeantoshi tweet media
English
5
1
14
948
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@0xAero8 no 2.5x token, it always 1:0.4 on dex With the current APR, there's no catalyst for its value when the APR is only 10-15%.
English
0
0
0
38
ParlayIt
ParlayIt@ParlayItGG·
BETA STARTING NOW! Reply to be among the first to get access
ParlayIt tweet media
English
50
7
62
9.9K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@koreaOnchain What happens if the supply on Upbit decreases? Will the price drop? I don't see this chart linked to any other price chart.
English
1
0
1
83
yoonseok
yoonseok@koreaOnchain·
Upbit still hasn’t reduced much liquidity on $ONDO yet. The balance keeps grinding higher over time instead of collapsing. People trading $ONDO should probably keep an eye on this.
yoonseok tweet media
English
2
0
5
1.1K
Roundtripper Clown
Roundtripper Clown@shengneuyt·
@nottellingyou73 Bro stfu u’ve went out of shadow all of a sudden just becos ondo price is up. And It stops doing so as soon as u talked about it. Stay out of the market please. x.com/nottellingyou7…
Not Telling@nottellingyou73

🚨 SOLD ALL MY STOCKS & CRYPTO TODAY The US will enter a massive recession driven by private credit and real estate Before 2008, there were many warnings of an impending bubble bursting Act now or regret it forever Thesis below: This whole private credit and real estate situation is starting to feel like a massive game of inaccurate valuations of positions. We’re looking at two simultaneous bubbles, private equity real estate and private credit that are effectively keeping each other afloat through some of the most creative accounting I’ve seen in years The core issue with private credit is that these funds are basically grading their own homework If you look at something like Blue Owl’s OBDC fund, over 94% of their portfolio is sitting in "Level 3" assets. That’s finance-speak for "we decided what this is worth because there’s no public market to tell us otherwise." You’re forced to just trust their internal models, which usually mark loans at par or even a gain, even when the macro environment is screaming the opposite But the real red flag is the surge in Payment-in-Kind (PIK) interest. Instead of the borrower paying cash, they just tack the interest onto the principal. It’s essentially a high-interest credit card for companies that can't afford their debt service. While it’s fine for a startup in growth mode, seeing it spike across the board is a massive distress signal. Why would a software company willingly take a 4% PIK on top of a 13% rate unless they were out of options? The funds keep marking these as "healthy" assets, but common sense says they’re going bad Then you look at the real estate side. Back in 2021, when money was basically free, private equity firms went on a buying spree, bidding up properties to levels that only made sense if rates stayed at zero forever. Now that the stimulus has dried up and rates have stayed higher for longer, the math has completely inverted These properties are operating at negative cash flow, and values have cratered below the debt levels I’m hearing more and more that firms are finally ready to just walk away and default because they can't sell without taking a 100% loss on their equity The scary part is that the pension funds and insurance companies invested in this stuff haven't even realized their money is gone yet because the valuations haven't been marked down to reality The writing is on the wall, and by the time the "official" reports catch up to the truth, it’s going to be too late to move ✌️

English
5
0
23
2.5K
Not Telling
Not Telling@nottellingyou73·
$Ondo already generating a ton of revenue Now with DTCC those fees are going to explode even higher But right now $Ondo is just a governance token, essentially just a vote in the Ondo DAO But the Ondo DAO is set to vote on a fee switch distributing the revenue to token holders later this year If/when the fee switch happens, expect Ondo to go top 10 very quickly Smart money has already started loading up which makes me think they know something that we don’t (maybe they know the fee switch will be passed later this year) Ondo is interesting again 👀
Ben Grossman@ben_grossman

Ondo x DTCC Excited to revolutionize finance and bring it all onchain!

English
28
90
752
70.7K
🐦Score
🐦Score@Twiter_score·
🏆 Who's funding DeFi United Arbitrum, Mantle & Aave lead the pack — top 10 contributors by $ size 👇 🥇 @arbitrum | T.Score: 691 $71M — L2 leader putting weight behind it 🥈 @Mantle_Official | T.Score: 279 $69M — modular L2 stepping in big 🥉 @aave | T.Score: 606 $57M — lending OG funding the cause • @StaniKulechov | T.Score: 970 $11M — Aave founder chipping in personally • @LidoFinance | T.Score: 401 $5M — staking giant at the table • @KelpDAO | T.Score: 107 $4M — restaking newcomer punching up • @golemproject | T.Score: 178 $2M — old-school decentralized compute crew • @The3D_ | T.Score: 204 $1M — anon shipper, see bio • @bgdlabs + @eboadom | T.Score: 65 $811K — Aave core dev shop • @claberus | T.Score: 39 $230K — smaller wallet, still on the list Lending OGs, L2s and a founder's personal wallet on the same donor sheet — rare lineup. Follow updates on @Twiter_score
🐦Score tweet media
English
7
1
12
874
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@JordiMorris1 @0xAero8 Merger Allocations, where did you get this information? It doesn't seem very accurate. Therefore, the percentages aren't as stated.
English
0
0
0
28
Aero
Aero@0xAero8·
There’s an interesting arb opportunity between $aero and $velo currently given the target % allocation that velo holders will get of aero 2.0. Could be an interesting strat to get a larger position until larger players show up to close up the gap 👀
English
11
0
36
7.8K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@realspunky_eth @AlpinaBG @Rabby_io So what did you lose? I don't see anything. Did you give the wrong Txid? I see that the highest balance in your wallet over the past month has only been $50, now is $32
English
0
0
1
24
Spunky 🐂🀄
Spunky 🐂🀄@realspunky_eth·
DO NOT use the "Convert Dust" feature on @Rabby_io wallet right now I made the mistake of initiating an approval through that feature, and it silently got a WALLET DRAINER approved in the process.
English
9
2
34
14.6K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@definunited Let's clarify this. Stop pretending to be ignorant, or are you simply unaware of how much #DU fee has generated?
Juno AZ tweet media
English
1
0
1
191
DeFi United Fund
DeFi United Fund@definunited·
We are still here and quietly approaching 850k usd in donations
DeFi United Fund tweet media
English
17
2
22
2.5K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@definunited Your website only displays the balance of the DeFi United multi-signature wallet. You need to show the percentage of ETH that DU has donated. Currently, this figure is $380k out of a total of $540k
English
1
0
0
85
DeFi United Fund
DeFi United Fund@definunited·
@junovzer Are you talking about their official donation website or our website? Ours is linked to Etherscan via API and calling the # of ETH donated or should be.
English
1
0
1
139
DeFi United Fund
DeFi United Fund@definunited·
Up to $540K donated and token value growing as well for $DU DeFi United ❤️
DeFi United Fund tweet media
English
4
3
28
2.1K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@definunited No, currently it only shows the ETH balance of the DeFi United wallet. So it's not all of yours. And Volume currently is 7.6M*5% est at 380K usd donate
English
1
0
0
112
Stani
Stani@StaniKulechov·
Aave is my life's work and we're working nonstop to find the best possible outcome for users. I’m personally contributing 5000 ETH to DeFi United as we continue working together with partners on formalizing more commitments. I’m working to see this resolved and market conditions normalized as soon as possible. DeFi United.
English
835
588
5.3K
592.6K
Juno AZ
Juno AZ@junovzer·
@0xngmi Case 1 is not feasible. If Kelp socializes the loss, the ETH recovered by Arbitrum must be shared with the entire market.
English
0
0
1
429
0xngmi
0xngmi@0xngmi·
checked the numbers and if arbitrum spends the seized money giving priority to arbitrum's aave market: - in case of socialization of losses -> no bad debt at all on arb - in case of rsETH on L2s getting rugged -> aave on arbitrum reduces bad debt by 80% ($88M to $17M)
English
29
15
304
33.7K