Sabitlenmiş Tweet
a roll of tape
7.3K posts

a roll of tape
@justarolloftape
Truth is treason in the empire of lies. They're going to make us trade the Bill of Rights for justice in this whole Epstein debacle.
Katılım Ağustos 2024
104 Takip Edilen227 Takipçiler

🚨🚨🚨Breaking:
The German government to build 15 new nuclear power plants and lift sanctions immediately on all Russian oil and natural gas.
German Chancellor Merz has also agreed to pay to rebuild the Nord Stream pipeline to Russia.
All wind and solar projects have been cancelled.
"It's time for Germany to open our energy economy. The best way to do this is via free markets, lowering taxes and regulations".
For Immediate Release.
Berlin, April 1 2026.

English

@TheBuckYouWill one of the greatest videos in the history of the internet
English

@justarolloftape @Ben68638515 @ABridgen I have already asked Dr. Braun similar questions. Below are my questions. He answered them.
x.com/JeanClaudeRact…
Jean-Claude Ract@JeanClaudeRact
@Ben68638515 @ABridgen Dear Mr. Braun, with the radioactivity measured remotely, you estimate the yield of the charge at 0.3 kt with a – let's say – “clean” bomb; but the radioactivity measured at GZ indicates – If I understand well – a “dirtier” bomb than Iroshima's. Isn't there a contradiction?
English

Evidence is now being released that the Israeli strike on Syria’s port of Tartus in Dec 2024 was in fact a 0.3kt tactical nuclear missile. 1/15 the size of the Hiroshima bomb. Please watch the video and tell me what you think in the comments. youtube.com/shorts/mvLhqu3…

YouTube
English

@Ben68638515 @ABridgen if the weapons were "dirty" then it would be incredibly easy to verify their use. if it's difficult to verify radioactive emissions even a couple hours after the explosion, what's the issue with this particular kind of explosion?
English

@doogadoo11 i know this is AI, but the donkey's hatred of canines is eternal
English

@Erdayastronaut we know, it's just nobody believes it lmao
English

@Ben68638515 @ABridgen If the nukes are clean, why does it matter if they're nukes?
English

Evidence for Tartus nuke (Dec 15 ’24, UTC) rests on 6 independent geophysical evidences (remote and local radiation, seismic waveform and amplitude, crater size, pressure damage). Every single one of these evidences are at variance with the unbased though widespread claim of a conventional explosive. Since more than a year, no single valid scientific argument has been presented against these evidences, despite unbased claims to the contrary. As some of these unbased claims are as unlikely to be correct as finding one particular atom in the entire Universe, yet find their way into absurdly "not even wrong" and misleading CN’s, here is a comprehensive rebuttal:
1) The observed radiation peak intensity in Cyprus (and Turkey) is in complete agreement with the quantitative predictions of a US DoD fallout model based on a 99.9% clean weapon [Housatonic ,1962] and a 0.3kt yield following independent from crater size *and* seismic data.
2) ) The unbased claim that observed radiation peaks are within “normal radiation levels”, blatantly ignores the fact in *all* 7 (!) Cyprus stations on Dec 16 ’24 are at 4-12 sigma above background. In addition, there are signals at 6 Turkish stations each with >7 sigma signals. The likelihood of all of these signals being random is much less than 1 in 10^52, or as absurdly unlikely as finding one particular atom in the whole of Earth. [Note that *one single* 5-sigma observation is sufficient for scientific discovery in Particle Physics, 2 sigma in Biology].
3) There is a similar unbased claim that the Tartus GZ radiation readings were random. Instead of sending a team in Dec ’24, IAEA sponsored the DoD co-sponsored “GoodISIS” to produce an entirely flawed report containing above erroneous arguments. The readings of 6000nSv/h, finally performed after 3 months, exceeded those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after a shorter time. Observed Tartus GZ radiation levels *exceeded* the published background levels in Syria of 94 +/- 8 nSv/h by more than 700 sigma (!), The claim of a a random occurrence is even less likely to be correct than finding one particular atom in the entire Universe.
And - last not least :
4) CTBTO Chief Rob Floyd has recently admitted that his organization is fundamentally unable to detect nukes with yield of <0.5kt ( that includes “dirty” ones). Thus CTBTO cannot detect the Tartus nuke of 0.3kt (B61-12 at lowest yield). Thus the claim that international agencies would have reported an event of the size of Tartus nuke is absurd and manifestly erroneous.
In conclusion, every single one of these misleading claims attempting to refute the overwhelming evidence for Tartus nuke has been obliterated.
ctbto.org/resources/for-…
English

@BrunetteBunny20 @Maxy_aura Lol I'm pretty sure they realize
English

@Maxy_aura I’ve seen way too many videos of Thai fights where everyone there kicks people in the head repeatedly. I think they have a low IQ and don’t realize kicks to the head are fatal.
English

@DanielMarkham What about people who are completely ambivalent about Pantera?
English

@Ryanmatta There are fuel shortages throughout rural Thailand right now.
English

I was just informed by my friend in Thailand, that all Asian countries have made deals for oil already and there is not a single line for any gas at any gas stations. He told me that their government officials already assured them. They said the EU, there screwed but Asian countries are happy getting energy/oil from Russia and Malaysia.
English

@BoulPizz Everyone's brain works differently. Assuming people without an internal monologue are "less than" is foolish
English

Nearly 50% of ppl do NOT have internal monologue. Once I found this out, everything made more sense. Ppl aren’t even THINKING

That Rabbit Guy@Son_ImSleep
A lot of people need direction, I’d say majority, free thinking isn’t a majority trait, most people you come across will always need to be told what to do
English

















