j
88 posts
I’ve only seen this setup 1 time in 6 years 👀
I’m putting $200k in this SINGLE stock
Very similar to $CAR that made millionaires
$100 → $100,000 overnight
$300 → $300,000 in a single day
This is the third time.
Comment “Trade” and I’ll send it.
(Must be following to DM)
English
27 SALMON DUDE WTFFFFFFF $NAK
Marc Milette@MarcMilette
🏔️ NAK Nation — The Briefs Are In. Here Is What You Need To Know. 🏔️ As we all know, Northern Dynasty and Pebble Limited Partnership filed their reply brief in case 3:24-cv-59 before Judge Sharon Gleason in the US District Court for the District of Alaska yesterday (April 14). The State of Alaska and the Iliamna Natives Ltd and Alaska Peninsula Corp also filed their reply briefs. The briefing record is now complete. Judge Gleason can rule at any time. I am not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. I've been reading the briefing over the past several hours and I wanted to share my thoughts with NAK Nation as soon as possible. With that said here is my honest assessment of what these briefs contain and why they matter. The Opening Line Says Everything Northern Dynasty's brief opens with this question directed at the EPA. "What devastating harm justifies destroying an over one billion dollar investment and depriving the nation of 800 billion dollars worth of its mineral wealth?" That is not a gentle introduction. That is a direct challenge. And the brief spends 76 pages answering it with documented evidence from the EPA's own administrative record. The EPA Has Been Retreating From Its Own Arguments The most important theme running through Northern Dynasty's brief is a pattern that repeats throughout every section. PLP identifies a specific factual claim the EPA made in the veto. Documents that the claim is irrational or directly contradicted by the Final Environmental Impact Statement. Then shows that when challenged in court the EPA retreated from or disavowed that very claim. When an agency cannot defend in court the findings on which it based its decision that is the textbook definition of arbitrary and capricious agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act. The FEIS Is The Gold Standard And The EPA Ignored It The 5000 plus page Final Environmental Impact Statement was prepared by AECOM an independent and highly experienced consulting firm. It is the most comprehensive scientific analysis of the Pebble Mine project ever conducted. The FEIS found the 2020 Mine Plan will have no measurable impact on Bristol Bay fish populations. The EPA left that conclusion undisturbed in the veto. Yet the EPA simultaneously counted the preservation of the Bristol Bay fishery as a benefit of issuing the veto. You cannot simultaneously find no measurable impact on Bristol Bay fish populations and count the preservation of Bristol Bay fish populations as a benefit of your decision. That is internally contradictory on its face. Northern Dynasty documented this with specific administrative record citations. The EPA has no response. The 27 Coho Argument This is the most memorable argument in the brief and I want to make sure NAK Nation understands it clearly. Only 27 salmon have been observed spawning in the only reach that would be affected. From only one species. In one reach. The EPA's position in litigation reduces to this. Any tiny stream with any single salmon must be preserved because that salmon is likely to have some genetic diversity and under EPA's portfolio theory every theoretical iota of genetic diversity must be preserved. No matter the cost. Northern Dynasty documents that those 27 salmon might disappear naturally in any given year. Commercial fishers take 1000 times as many from the Nushagak District every year. The FEIS concluded the impacts would not be measurable and would fall within the range of natural variability. The EPA agreed with that finding. Then disregarded it anyway. The EPA is preserving 27 salmon at the cost of 800 billion dollars of national mineral wealth. And when challenged in court the EPA's response was that the number of salmon in a stream does not matter. The EPA Did Not Even Count Gold Northern Dynasty documents that the EPA's economic analysis did not count gold production at all. The Pebble deposit contains tens of millions of ounces of gold. Omitting gold from an economic analysis of the Pebble Mine is not a minor technical error. It is a fundamental failure that renders the cost benefit analysis irrational on its face. The EPA Applied The Wrong Legal Standard Section 404c of the Clean Water Act authorizes a veto only if a discharge will have an unacceptable adverse effect. Not might. Not may. Will. Northern Dynasty documents that the EPA used the word could throughout the veto rather than will. Could is the language of hypothesis and possibility not certainty. Under the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision from 2024 Judge Gleason must independently determine what the statute requires. The EPA cannot claim deference for its interpretation. And the best interpretation of will is not reasonably likely. It is reasonable certainty. The EPA Understated Pebble's Copper Contribution The EPA admitted it understated what Pebble would contribute to US copper supply. The correct figure is double or triple what the veto said. The EPA called this error insignificant. Northern Dynasty's response is precise and powerful. The EPA regards the putative loss of 0.01 percent of the Bristol Bay Coho population as catastrophic. But a contribution to US copper supply two orders of magnitude larger than that as no big deal. That is not a reasonable balancing of costs and benefits. That is an agency that had already decided the answer and worked backwards. The State of Alaska Brief The State of Alaska filed its own separate brief making six independent legal arguments. The strongest is this. The EPA drew its defined area around land not water. Section 404c only authorizes EPA to act within waters of the United States. The EPA never established which specific water features within its 309 square mile defined area were actually jurisdictional waters. It simply assumed they were. The EPA admitted this in its own brief. The State of Alaska used that admission directly against it. The State also argued that the Alaska Statehood Act uses the word shall in conveying mineral rights to the state. Shall is mandatory under settled Supreme Court precedent. The federal government made a binding promise to Alaska at statehood. The EPA cannot override that promise without clear congressional authorization it does not have. The Native Corporations Brief Iliamna Natives Ltd and Alaska Peninsula Corp represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation argued that Section 404c is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. The federal defendants admitted in their own brief that the EPA Administrator has unfettered discretion to decide whether to issue a veto or do nothing. No intelligible principle guides that choice. Under the Supreme Court's own precedent from Panama Refining Co v Ryan that is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. What Happens Next Judge Gleason now has everything she needs to rule. She can rule at any time. There is no required waiting period. Her ruling could come in days weeks or months. That uncertainty is real and your investment thesis should account for it. What I can tell you is this. The complete plaintiff coalition has presented Judge Gleason with a comprehensive and multi-layered legal challenge that gives her multiple independent paths to vacate the veto without ever reaching disputed scientific questions. She can decide this case on statutory text and documented administrative record failures alone. The briefing record is STRONG. The EPA's documented retreats from its own stated rationales in litigation are particularly damaging to the government's position. The destination remains the same. The world's largest undeveloped copper deposit. 57 billion pounds of copper. 71 million ounces of gold. On Alaska state land. Blocked by a veto that multiple plaintiffs have documented as unlawful on multiple independent grounds. Please share this post. "Information is Power" Stay locked in NAK Nation. 🇺🇸🚀💎 #NAKNation #PebbleMine #NorthernDynasty #CriticalMinerals #AlaskaComeback #CopperDemand
English
@PolarizingLit what’s going on with nak, why’s it up 15% across the week, pls tell me insiders are loading before the big news
English
j retweetledi
Kevin i always do my part you don’t need to worry about that, like i said from day one ill absolutely batter you from pillar to post your to small built like a t-rex with them tiny arms you wouldn’t touch me.
Kevin Vallejos@ElChinoVallejos
I want to fight Luke Riley in England 🏴 #UFCQatar But he needs to do his part. Let's see how it goes
English
I want to fight Luke Riley in England 🏴 #UFCQatar
But he needs to do his part. Let's see how it goes
English
@Uncoo1Unc1e @ocelotmma How can you watch a man fold someone and then say he’s too small 😭
English
Luke Riley makes his UFC debut this weekend.
11-0 fighting out of Next Gen, same camp as Paddy
A fast, powerful puncher in the pocket, he has had some absolute wars in Cage Warriors, and I am sure he will have some more in the UFC.
He faces Bogdan Grad at UFC Qatar
English
Does anyone have any latest news or progress about LUNA? Have you submitted the form on KROLL? Have you received any response from the platform? At what stage is your status displayed? I hope everyone can share their information! #luna #terraform #TFL #KROLL
#CryptoLossClaims
English
@web3hunterdog The claim amount is $9-10k, I didn’t track my own out of pocket investments tho as I was new at the time. Had around 350 Luna when it was at $115. But that also won’t be anywhere near the amount i recieve, I’ll honestly probably only get 10% of the offered amount
English
Base breakouts are one of my top setups to play:
$IREN
I look for three things:
1. Prelonged consolidation below a major resistance
Price consolidated below 15 from Apr 2022 to Jun 2025, throughout that phase it went through almost 10 rejections at resistance.
2. A break ✅
In Jun 2025- We got a breakout above 15.
And that was move initiation point .
3. And then at last, a successful retest ✅
Which happened in Jul 2025. Price tested and held $15 support.
Thats where you buy more.
Since then price rose 400%
You will see this happen over and over.
$HOOD $PLTR $WULF $CIFR $HUT $APP $SNOW $EOSE and many more.
Make a copy of this.
English
@mikealfred Pebble mine $NAK is gonna open and they’re gonna give $scwo the contract to clean the waste
English
I’m just going to tell you right now. This is going to be a very big week and things will never be the same afterwards.
English
@PolarizingLit Just open pebble mine and give SCWO the contract to clean the waste from the mine
English
@PolarizingLit Yeh I’m literally just gambling on two signatures from trump for nak n scwo
English
@jyelir hahahaha they're down today. I might get more I think this one is a play ripe for getting some govt contracts to remove the pfas
English
Lfg $wwr
Westwater Resources Inc@WWR_Inc
National security starts with supply security. 🇺🇸 From the graphite in defense-grade batteries to rare-earth magnets in fighter jets — critical minerals power our protection. Westwater Resources is helping build that capacity right here in America. #CriticalMinerals #Graphite #NationalSecurity #MadeInUSA
I’m looking to add another rare earth stock to my portfolio. I’m bullish across the whole sector, especially given the geopolitical and policy tailwinds I see emerging. I’ve already made $UAMY my third largest holding.
The top two reasons I’m doubling down right now:
1. The Department of Defense is investing heavily into the rare earth supply chain. For example, it’s acquiring a 15 % stake in MP Materials and backing a new magnet-making facility. There’s also broader federal funding in place. The US government has proposed nearly $1 billion for critical minerals and rare earth development through the Department of Energy and associated programs. The Pentagon itself has mentioned investing $540 million into critical minerals projects. So policy is clearly aligning with my thesis.
2. China’s export controls / dominance risk. China remains the main global processor of rare earth elements and has lately tightened export controls, citing national security and dual-use (defense/semiconductor) concerns. China recently expanded its export restrictions to additional elements and restricted export of equipment and technology tied to mining, refining, and magnets. These moves create downstream supply risk for foreign buyers and open the door for alternative suppliers (like US ones) to capture market share.
Given those dynamics, I believe adding more exposure now makes sense.
English
I’ve made over $100,000 in just 3 months using my custom CBC strategy.
Now I turned it into a FREE TradingView indicator that tells you exactly when to buy and sell—no guesswork.
I’ve been testing it for months, and it’s been printing. 📈
Like + Comment “Trade” - I’ll DM it to you.
(Must be following to DM)
$SPY $SPX
English
@moninvestor Got back into investing after some years travelling and mainly the ptsd from Luna, found your account and I’m up 40+% in 30 days
English
Sept Portfolio Performance.
YTD: +395.40%
Last 30 Days: +57.20%
Long-Term Portfolio:
1. $IREN
2. $ONDS
3. $RR
Short-Term Portfolio:
1. $CIFR
2. $FUBO
3. New Stock (could become a LT hold).
Sold:
LT: $HIMS (Trading now)
ST: $ROOT & $ENPH
New stock, still researching. 🧐
English