Sabitlenmiş Tweet
baru pulang dari my korean trip!! mau post fangirling core kuuu HIHIHI🥹🖤 bakal kangeeen banget..
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^
8.3K posts
자 ♡ kyoong ^^
@kaigomcha
used to be an exo-l ot9, but for now i’m choosing peace as a bbhls ♡ 🐶 # cbx is exo
Katılım Eylül 2021
926 Takip Edilen863 Takipçiler
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
@kaigomcha Aku sering bgtt pake bahasa bayi endingnya tetep mentalll gangerti mereka. Nyanggahnya juga Allahuakbar asbun
Indonesia
✨*Rangkuman versi Bahasa Bayi* ✨
best of 백현이 ❤️@bestofbyunbaek
📢 [READ] CBX Contract Dispute Explained: — 1. 2011 – Original Contract • Baekhyun signed a standard 7-year exclusive contract with SM Entertainment in May 2011, along with the members of EXO. The contract period was counted from the group’s first album release. • Shortly after debut, the members reportedly signed an additional 3-year extension, mainly due to overseas promotions. - The clause automatically extends the contract until the required number of albums is released. • SM Entertainment had previously received corrective measures stating that contracts should not exceed 7 years. It was introduced by Korea FTC after earlier SM contract disputes. • Including Bekhyun’s military service hiatus (which pauses the contract), his contract was expected to end in early 2024 — roughly 13 years in total. 2. Late 2022 – 5-Year Pre-Signed Extension (2024–2029) Before his original contract expired, Byun Baekhyun signed a 5-year extension (2024–2029) with SM Entertainment while still enlisted in the military. • Reported pressure: Baekhyun’s side later stated that the renewal was signed under pressure. They claimed he was singled out and told that other members would receive certain benefits only if he signed. • “Sign now, cancel later” claim: His legal team stated he was told, “Sign now; you can cancel it later before the contract activates.” At the time, about one year remained on his original contract, and he was reportedly told changes could be made before January 2024. It was implied that refusing to sign collectively could also pose risks to the group’s stability. • Revision requests: CBX’s legal representative, Lee Jae-hak, stated that contract revisions were requested eight times, but none were accepted. • Settlement data requests: Starting in March 2023, Baekhyun, along with Chen and Xiumin, requested transparent settlement data (“provision”) under their contract and the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act. • CBX stated they made multiple formal requests (commonly cited as seven), but were denied copies. • SM disputed this, stating that the data was made available for on-site inspection, but not for copying. • Termination notice: On June 1, 2023, CBX formally submitted a notice of termination for the extension contract set to begin in 2024, citing lack of settlement transparency. Presentation: canva.link/xve2k4tfj8ko9hi Full list of sources: bit.ly/CBXclarificati…
Indonesia
maap gue yg di bidang kesehatan ini kaga bs speak up krn tkt salah jg jd cmn bantu retweet2in kalian WKAKAKW😭✌🏻 …
Indonesia
so proud bbhls yg pinter pinter ngerti hukum akutansi dan sebagainya ini lgsng pd speak up!!! SO PROUD OF U GUYSSS (and baekhyunee will be proud too..) 🤟🏻🌟 #StandWithCBX
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
Aduh, pusing dah kalau debatnya cuma modal 'katanya' tapi nggak paham prosedur hukum.
giniii..
eh sblm itu tolong ngetik pake spasi anjir pake tanda baca biarr orang ngerti .
Puyeng aku liat ketikanmu.
Sejak kapan confidentiality (kerahasiaan) menghapus hak pihak dalam kontrak untuk punya salinan data pribadinya sendiri?
Soal Salinan Data
Hak transparansi itu mencakup hak atas SALINAN (copy), bukan cuma numpang baca di kantor SM. Kenapa harus minta salinan? supaya bisa dihitung ulang secara independen oleh akuntan luar. Kalau cuma disuruh dateng ke kantor SM, ya itu namanya inspeksi di bawah pengawasan lawan. Mana bisa objektif?
trus soal onfidentiality
Kerahasiaan itu bukan alasan buat menghalangi hak artis dapet data pribadinya. SM minta syarat 'nggak ada pihak ketiga' itu cuma taktik buat menghambat. Artis berhak dapet bantuan hukum/audit dari pihak mana pun yang mereka tunjuk.
Soal MA/Ditolak
Yang ditolak itu Document Submission Order (perintah penyerahan dokumen secara paksa) karena dianggap kurang spesifik di tahap awal. Itu BUKAN putusan akhir kalau SM nggak salah. Kasus utamanya soal Wanprestasi (tarif 5.5%) justru baru masuk tahap pembuktian materiil.
Stop bilang mereka kalah 4x , 6x, 12 x kalau kamu nggak bisa bedain mana 'putusan sela/prosedural' mana 'putusan final'. Belajar dulu bedanya prosedur administrasi, bukti sama inti perkara dulu
👑 Reverxe • EXO Ladder 5@klimtchange
Diblok sama OP yang bikin thread jadi gak bisa nge-refute langsung 😂 “pendapatan digabungin” tuh kata siapa sih anjir? Ini mistranslation apa emang dari sumbernya ngarang aja? Kalo yang dimaksud “revenue as a group” buat aktivitas2 EXO, ya pasti “digabungin” dong tapi kan pasti ada pay distributionnya. Kalo solo mah ya masing2 lah??? Ga usah segrup deh, Baekhyun sama Xiumin aja ga bakal mau kali solo revenuesnya “digabung” terus dibagirata? Gitu kah maksud kalian 😭? Lagian masih aja bahas transparansi, udah ditolak semua woy request CBX tuh. CBX selalu dibolehin dateng untuk inspeksi: kenapa “dateng”? Karena ini tuh data sifatnya CONFIDENTIAL. Risky bgt kalo sistemnya pake fotokopian yg dibagi2 sembarangan. Bahkan mrk boleh bawa akuntan sendiri, tp dateng gak untuk inspeksi langsung? Mrk keukeuh maunya minta salinan. Pas SM udah mau ngasih, udah minta izin member yg lain, CBX dikasih syarat harus konfirmasi kalau GA ADA pihak ketiga, eh langsung ANYEP malah minta kesana kemari sampe banding segala ke MA. Dan tetep DITOLAK: request CBX dianggap terlalu broad, ga bisa nge-specify scope yang dimasalahin itu tuh apa/berapa; pay distribution kah (kyk JYJ), royalti dari album kah, intinya dianggap cuma spekulasi liar doang; ga legitimate ada concern atau urgensi; claimnya ga ada basis yg jelas. At least 4x mereka udah KALAH soal ini (1x Ministry, 1x district court, 1x high court, 1x Supreme Court). SM dianggap udah transparan & sesuai aturan; gak melakukan pelanggaran.
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
harusnya kalo orang2 punya akal ngerti siapa impostornya disini 😂 cbx selama ini cuma minta transparasi malah dicap pengkhianat 🤦🏻
best of 백현이 ❤️@bestofbyunbaek
📢 [READ] CBX Contract Dispute Explained: — 1. 2011 – Original Contract • Baekhyun signed a standard 7-year exclusive contract with SM Entertainment in May 2011, along with the members of EXO. The contract period was counted from the group’s first album release. • Shortly after debut, the members reportedly signed an additional 3-year extension, mainly due to overseas promotions. - The clause automatically extends the contract until the required number of albums is released. • SM Entertainment had previously received corrective measures stating that contracts should not exceed 7 years. It was introduced by Korea FTC after earlier SM contract disputes. • Including Bekhyun’s military service hiatus (which pauses the contract), his contract was expected to end in early 2024 — roughly 13 years in total. 2. Late 2022 – 5-Year Pre-Signed Extension (2024–2029) Before his original contract expired, Byun Baekhyun signed a 5-year extension (2024–2029) with SM Entertainment while still enlisted in the military. • Reported pressure: Baekhyun’s side later stated that the renewal was signed under pressure. They claimed he was singled out and told that other members would receive certain benefits only if he signed. • “Sign now, cancel later” claim: His legal team stated he was told, “Sign now; you can cancel it later before the contract activates.” At the time, about one year remained on his original contract, and he was reportedly told changes could be made before January 2024. It was implied that refusing to sign collectively could also pose risks to the group’s stability. • Revision requests: CBX’s legal representative, Lee Jae-hak, stated that contract revisions were requested eight times, but none were accepted. • Settlement data requests: Starting in March 2023, Baekhyun, along with Chen and Xiumin, requested transparent settlement data (“provision”) under their contract and the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act. • CBX stated they made multiple formal requests (commonly cited as seven), but were denied copies. • SM disputed this, stating that the data was made available for on-site inspection, but not for copying. • Termination notice: On June 1, 2023, CBX formally submitted a notice of termination for the extension contract set to begin in 2024, citing lack of settlement transparency. Presentation: canva.link/xve2k4tfj8ko9hi Full list of sources: bit.ly/CBXclarificati…
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
Okee aku jelasin perspektif dari orang hukum ya, bukan muggle/awam, biar sama-sama paham.Aku gatau ini udah bahasa bayi bgt atau gak biar orang2 awam kyk kamu paham. Karena hukum gabisa di sederhanakan jadi bahasa bayi sebenernya.
Oh ya kamu nggak bisa nyebut dia 'labil' kalau melihatnya dari fakta hukum. Karena indo dan korea sama2 menganut (Civil Law) kontrak sah jika ada itikad baik (good faith) dan kesepakatan bebas.
Izin masukin ini
Di Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata (Indo) & Pasal 110 Civil Act Korea, pernyataan kehendak karena penipuan/paksaan (duress) itu bisa DIBATALKAN. Masalahnya, kontrak ini ditandatangani di bawah tekanan (undue influence) dengan janji revisi yang diingkari pihak agensi. Jadi, unsur 'kesepakatan bebas' ini cacat
(defective consent).
Soal transparansi? minta data settlement itu KEWAJIBAN HUKUM perusahaan, bukan karena artisnya plin-plan. Penolakan kasih data itu pelanggaran hak. Dari situ aja udah menimbulkan sengketa.
lagian mereka juga ngga langsung ke pengadilan, tapi melalui proses permintaan data dan jalur administratif terlebih dahulu.
Jadi, ini bukan soal labil, tapi soal menuntut hak atas pelanggaran janji perusahaan. Menggugat setelah merasa dicurangi itu langkah hukum yang sah, bukan plin-plan. Coba pelajari lagi syarat sahnya perjanjian sebelum asal sebut 'labil'.
Miss Typo@Sillyiliy
Sebagai orang yg awam namun waras sih aku lebih bingung knp doi sempet perpanjang kontrak lalu kemudian tiba2 berubah pikiran dan langsung main tuntutan ke pengadilan?🤔 kalo emg ada masalah dr awal harusnya gausah perpanjang aja. Labil apa gimana
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
bayangin dalam sebuah kelompok elu kerja sana sini, kerjaa nya lebih banyak dari temen sekelompok lu tapi pendapatan nya di gabungin awokawok siapa yg ga marah.
best of 백현이 ❤️@bestofbyunbaek
📢 [READ] CBX Contract Dispute Explained: — 1. 2011 – Original Contract • Baekhyun signed a standard 7-year exclusive contract with SM Entertainment in May 2011, along with the members of EXO. The contract period was counted from the group’s first album release. • Shortly after debut, the members reportedly signed an additional 3-year extension, mainly due to overseas promotions. - The clause automatically extends the contract until the required number of albums is released. • SM Entertainment had previously received corrective measures stating that contracts should not exceed 7 years. It was introduced by Korea FTC after earlier SM contract disputes. • Including Bekhyun’s military service hiatus (which pauses the contract), his contract was expected to end in early 2024 — roughly 13 years in total. 2. Late 2022 – 5-Year Pre-Signed Extension (2024–2029) Before his original contract expired, Byun Baekhyun signed a 5-year extension (2024–2029) with SM Entertainment while still enlisted in the military. • Reported pressure: Baekhyun’s side later stated that the renewal was signed under pressure. They claimed he was singled out and told that other members would receive certain benefits only if he signed. • “Sign now, cancel later” claim: His legal team stated he was told, “Sign now; you can cancel it later before the contract activates.” At the time, about one year remained on his original contract, and he was reportedly told changes could be made before January 2024. It was implied that refusing to sign collectively could also pose risks to the group’s stability. • Revision requests: CBX’s legal representative, Lee Jae-hak, stated that contract revisions were requested eight times, but none were accepted. • Settlement data requests: Starting in March 2023, Baekhyun, along with Chen and Xiumin, requested transparent settlement data (“provision”) under their contract and the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act. • CBX stated they made multiple formal requests (commonly cited as seven), but were denied copies. • SM disputed this, stating that the data was made available for on-site inspection, but not for copying. • Termination notice: On June 1, 2023, CBX formally submitted a notice of termination for the extension contract set to begin in 2024, citing lack of settlement transparency. Presentation: canva.link/xve2k4tfj8ko9hi Full list of sources: bit.ly/CBXclarificati…
Indonesia
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
One day they say CBX are broke, not getting paid.
Next day they say CBX are the one not paying the people [conveniently ignoring 'the person is charge resigned'] Let's stick to a script. Shall we?
English
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
cha ga won does not represent them because she is not a lawyer.
baekhyun has ~₩10B loan on his name from the bank for his jeonse lease.
baekhyun is not gifted any villa by cha ga won. he leased the apartment he is residing now through a jeonse deal. so he is a tenant.
his jeonse lease runs until april 2027. after that he can choose to renew his lease or not.
BKK BASE@Boboholes2025
Because Baekhyun owns 30% shares of INB100. 70% Cha Gawon. CBX has an ongoing lawsuit and Cha Gawon represents them. Baekhyun personally have 15 Billion loan with Cha Gawon as her guarantor. Cha Gawon provided CBX a luxury villa each member as a signing bonus.
English
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
and CBX are signed under INB100, they are NOT 100RED artists
˚ʚ♡ɞ˚@kyoongfairy
now is also a good time to mention that ONE HUNDRED and INB100 are NOT the same company! INB100 is a SUBSIDIARY of ONE HUNDRED. INB100 is an INDEPENDENT COMPANY that ONE HUNDRED owns stocks in. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME
English
자 ♡ kyoong ^^ retweetledi
📢 [NOTICE]
Hi everyone! Many of us were expecting a court hearing and update today. However, the hearing has been postponed and is now expected to take place in April.
We will no longer share updates or information about the hearing date in advance to avoid creating false expectations. Let us all wait for verified sources to relay the news.
To clarify: The March 19 date did not originate from us; it was said to be part of the court schedule. The postponement to April was relayed by a Korean fan who sent us a DM.
Please note: This is a civil case concerning the revenue‑sharing dispute. It is not a criminal case, nor is it related to group activities. We kindly ask everyone to avoid doomposting or unnecessary alarm. Final results may require multiple hearings before a conclusion is reached.
Thank you
English