pelu 🏎🏁

it's time for the second round ✧ #NJZ_REDEBUT

Today, more than ever 🗣

NJZ NEVER DIE HIJOSDE PUTA

Danielle of NewJeans debuts a blonde bob.

3D doodle #해린 #HAERIN

i'm not worried, disappointed sure, but i always trust the girls and will always be by their side with them 💙🩷💛💚💜♾️ #StayStrongMHDHH #BunniesAgainstAdor

the fairy association’s got your back 🧚 #엔제이지 #NJZ #MHDHH

@05NWJS THANK YOUUU 😭😭❤️

@kangaroomii Omgggg so cool 🧎‍♀️

Ningning x pelu¡ - aishiteru #pelu #aespa #NINGNING

We are this close… #NJZ #MHDHH

pikminjeanz 💙🩷💛💚💜 (you might see them used soon in @NintendoJeanz 😉) #엔제이지 #NJZ #MHDHH

3D doodle #해린 #HAERIN

@KouS3i0214 OMGGGG thank you so much for use my wallpaper 😭😭😭🩷

After NJZ submitted a USB to the court, ADOR’s side, represented by Kim & Chang, immediately threw up a “procedural issue.” According to a legal expert: “In an appellate review (항고심), the court typically relies only on the records and arguments presented during the preliminary injunction. If new evidence is suddenly submitted, Kim & Chang would naturally raise a ‘procedural issue.’ But here’s the nuance: If that USB contains evidence that only became available after the preliminary injunction, the court might make an exception and accept it. On the other hand, if it looks like the evidence was available back then and was somehow just intentionally withheld? That’s a red flag. So the court’s job is to figure out whether submitting that USB was even procedurally legit. That’s what ADOR is pushing them to review. Then comes the real question: is what’s inside the USB actually important enough to sway the outcome? If both boxes get checked, clean procedure and strong evidentiary weight, the court can choose to accept it. And from the looks of it, that USB is packing some serious heat.

minji with hardware #MINJI #민지

now this is just mean 😭

💗Tell me 스케치💗 #NewJeans #NJZ #뉴진스 #엔제이지

Tokkis rate this note HELPFUL! -On all accounts ! -Only check around 2 boxes ! 🔗: x.com/i/birdwatch/t/…