Karl Gee

Some notes on my work ethic: -I last voted in Parliament on 18 March, so I haven’t done my job for ten weeks. -I’ve never held any face-to-face constituency surgeries, despite apparently having £5 million to spend on security. -I refuse to do interviews or face press scrutiny of any sort. -when I was in the European Parliament I had the 4th worst attendance record out of 748 MEPs. -although I did manage to turn up to vote AGAINST plans to tackle Russian misinformation. -I was on the Fisheries Committee but I only turned up to ONE out of 42 meetings. -but I will of course be taking my £73,000 EU pension. Vote Reform, get lazy, grifting, self-serving sacks of shit.

People are saying that Nigel Farage has asked Elon Musk to ban people from X for sharing this clip of him attacking his crony Robert Jenrick. Surely free speech champion Nigel Farage isn't that petty? But just in case, THIS is the video that you mustn't download or share

It’s exceptionally hot in some areas today so you may fancy a dip to cool off 🌊 But take care as sea and water temperatures are much lower, which can lead to cold shock, so stay safe if you’re heading to the coast or inland waters ⛵

Before Brexit the UK was the 5th cheapest for Food in Europe. Now we are 25/28. And it is not just Brexit that has done that, the Supermarkets are ripping you off as well.

“The Government has privately admitted Ed Miliband's wind turbines and solar farms are bad for the environment. Astonishingly, it shows for the first time that Labour realise the rush for Net Zero will come at the expense of the environment, but are pushing ahead anyway. Bureaucrats admit the plans may destroy 'nationally recognised sites, landscapes and historic environments' as well as damaging 'biodiversity and water resources.' Officials also confess his schemes may increase 'air emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, noise and vibrations, light pollution, dust and soils.'”

The Great British net zero con-trick of Drax. The Labour government is trying to force through an extension that would give Drax an estimated £1.8bn in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already received. Drax has burned an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. And here’s the con trick: Drax is a sneaky way of exporting our CO2 emissions. We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station. And here’s the kicker - the CO2 emissions tally is not counted against the country that burns it, but the country that grows it. So Drax emissions are counted against the countries who grow and export the wood for Drax - like Canada and USA…not UK who burn it. So the UK can reduce CO2 figures by importing the burning wood grown elsewhere. A gigantic net zero con-trick.

“Let’s spend £4.5 trillion on net zero over the next 25 years despite the UK only accounting for less than 1% of annual global CO2 emissions. Let’s increase taxes to pay for net zero. Let’s ban new oil and gas licences in the North Sea but spaff away £40billion buying North Sea oil and gas from Norway. Let’s buy coking coal shipments worth £7.2million from Japan but ban UK coal mining. Let’s plaster thousands of acres of farmland with solar panels but spend £50million on sun dimming experiments. Let’s give huge renewable energy construction contracts to China. Let’s give Drax an estimated £1.8billlion in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11billion it has already received despite Drax burning an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Let’s give £1billion this year alone to wind power companies not to generate power from their wind turbines. And let’s spend £30billion of taxpayers’ money on carbon capture machines but put pensioners, farmers and the disabled into financial peril by claiming there’s a £22bn black hole.”

Nigel Farage, "At Michael Barrymore's house they removed all the ashtrays, on the basis that they chuck all the fags in the pool." Can't imagine the outrage if they found a clip of Zack Polanski saying this. Imagine there will be silence because it's Nigel Farage.

I seem to have upset the @Nigel_Farage fan club - so let me be clear. This man sows hate, lies and division. He is a grifter and a conman. He does not represent the vast majority of Britons. RT if you agree P.s. multiculturalism is great.

Farage says his £5 million gift was a “reward” for Brexit. The rest of us were rewarded with higher bills and years of chaos. This grifter must not become prime minister.

Of course.

Out of curiosity, why is there so much pressure on Starmer to resign But no pressure on Nigel Farage who took a £5,000,000 gift from a foreign billionaire and coincidentally started calling for the very thing the foreign billionaire wants for the UK, crypto deregulation?

Thank you everyone for sending this to 200,000 views🙏 It’s now almost caught up with Farage’s original post. Let’s call his bull**** out by making sure more see this one

LIVERPOOL - indeed all football fans who remember Hillsborough There is your reason to NOT vote for Reform today

RT if you would NEVER vote reform 🙏

- Starmer gets some new glasses? ‘He needs to resign!’ - Farage gets £5 million? *crickets* James O'Brien is baffled by the lack of coverage following the Reform leader's multimillion-pound 'gift' from a crypto billionaire.

Switzerland 🇨🇭 Solar panels on train tracks. A hell of a lot more logical than plastering over prime farmland.

Why is Zia Yusuf, who has never been elected as an MP or councillor, appearing on #BBCQT when Reform UK already has elected MPs and 900+ councillors? Didn't we Brexit to get away from unelected bureaucrats 😉 Surely one of these Reform UK stars - men of the people - should be on BBCQT tonight instead? Tice (£600,000) Richard Tice has been the subject of media reporting and commentary relating to the structuring of his business and property interests, with some outlets speculating that such arrangements may have had the effect of reducing tax liabilities. Figures mentioned in commentary have included estimates in the region of £600,000, although these are not established as confirmed amounts and are not the subject of any public finding of wrongdoing by HMRC. Interpretations of the reporting vary and the underlying details remain a matter of dispute. Jenrick (£37,000) Robert Jenrick has faced media scrutiny in relation to a political donation of approximately £37,000 made to his campaign, which has been discussed in the context of the donor company’s later reported associations. The issue has centred on questions of transparency and due diligence in political donations rather than any finding of illegality or improper acceptance of funds, and no allegation of knowingly receiving illicit donations has been upheld by any official body. Farage (£5,000,000) Nigel Farage has been associated in media reporting with discussion of significant political funding linked to Reform UK, including references to a donation or financial support package reported to be in the region of £5 million. This has been the subject of public debate regarding transparency and the influence of large private donations in politics. The funds relate to party financing arrangements rather than a personal payment to Farage, and commentary on the matter varies in interpretation.

Why have we seen nothing of this on the news ?