⏳Migrating earlier doesn't necessarily guarantee a better position. Initially, accounts that contribute more actively will be prioritized for early surplus, which inadvertently puts pressure on those who sell early. Due to the design of increasing $ITL value over time, those who sell early $ITL will need to buy back the $ITL they sold later at a higher price. This is actually a suitable strategy for those who start accumulating $ITL early. While the initial distribution and staking ratios of $ITL aren't at their best (because pioneers act at the same time), this means that later migrants may receive a better distribution ratio with the $ITL value already established by the pioneers. The key point is that $ITL will increase in value over time, and funds will apply their strategies in the early stages of the market to buy $ITL at a lower price. Migrating earlier isn't necessarily a good position because holding pressure is never easy. When funds start participating, early adopters will face not just one, but many waves of FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt), and I think 80% of them won't be able to hold onto their assets in the first move. The market is always brutal. For me, whether I migrate early or late doesn't matter; what matters is the amount of $ITL I can accumulate over-the-counter at a good price and compete with other funds. Plan to push value will follow these steps: 1. Accumulate $ITL from early adopters at a low price over-the-counter. 2. List on the NYSE and deploy 10,000 $ITL settlement points on-chain. 3. Increase the value of $ITL accumulated in the early stages at a higher price. Earlier migration doesn't necessarily guarantee a better position; timing is always the most important factor in any situation. #Interlink #ITL #ITLG
