Karly

@NatalieDiana67 That post shows how deranged these ppl truly are.

This one is still on his side, and also trying to push a delusional narrative....sorry, doll...ain't happening.

@JohnDePetroshow Exactly these firms don’t take on just any case.

Chris Mattei is a tremendous attorney and to land him speaks volumes of their confidence in the case.

@BfloFanatics Idk this one’s sick. 🔥

“Where else would you rather pee!?” Is this the wildest #BillsMafia 🦬 tattoo yet? 😂 Link to their IG on the next ➡️

Make this go viral. ⚖️👩‍⚖️

@MamaLama43 @TuesdayGazette Very similar tactics

Chris Mattei—the attorney who represented the Sandy Hook families and won the $1.4B defamation verdict against Alex Jones, the largest in U.S. history—is now representing Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, and Colin Albert in their defamation and conspiracy lawsuit against Aidan Kearney and Karen Read. He built his reputation taking down lies in the most high-profile defamation cases ever. He’s not putting that on the line to represent some imaginary “corrupt gang of killers” led by a soccer mom. Wake up. defendingthetruth.org

@TuesdayGazette Congratulations Mr Jones on handing over $300+ million

She’s congratulating Alex Jones. 🫠

@riversedgg It’s also very expensive.

I can't see Bradl or Bederow going against Mattei in the defamation case. Aidan will likely need to find another lawyer, which could be challenging given his volatility and lack of self-discipline.

@SF_investigates You do think maybe they want this to play in the public vs going thru the grand jury.

#D4vd was arrested by complaint, not indictment, and the case will be submitted to the DA’s office by Monday for charging consideration. This likely means either the Grand Jury did not return an indictment, or the DA chose not to seek one. An arrest by complaint means there will be a preliminary hearing to determine probable cause. This is a public hearing where evidence is presented and witnesses are questioned under oath, something that is bypassed with a Grand Jury indictment. It will be important to see whether this reflects a difference in strategy or a difference of opinion regarding the strength of the case between LAPD and the DA, or if there is another reason for proceeding this way. Immunity agreements, whether formal or informal (proffer), remain in effect even though there was no indictment. #CelesteRivasHernandez

@SF_investigates Steve, today’s a great day! I hope you know in your heart that you helped this day from the fruition. If it weren’t for you and the landlord who you knows what would have happened.

From the LAPD public information officer regarding the arrest of David Anthony Burke for the murder of Celeste Rivas Hernandez #D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez

@theymattered25 Believing something doesn’t make it fact.

Rumor has it you might want to sit down baby girl !

@shazlick79 Love it!

Melanie Little, The Glarer, Loophole Lawyer, Emily See. All of you should be aware that you have all participated in this. All for monetary gain. The house of cards is falling.

@j3nnyb00m Same way you can be found liable in civil for the death of someone after being acquitted 😂

Karen Read was found NOT GUILTY, right? So how are these people allowed to make these slanderous claims in this document?? I’m not following here 👀

@PhD_OnTheCouch Wild right

I will never fully understand how anyone would toss their entire future/kids' future & possible freedom away for Karen Read? She is the most selfish, self centered person on earth

@SacredHope @zonaeagle @DoctorTurtleboy Gosh, thank god for AI 😂

@zonaeagle @DoctorTurtleboy But has he actually read Mass. General Laws c.231 § 59H?🥴🫠

Karen and Aidan @DoctorTurtleboy , allow me to introduce Christopher Mattei, the brilliant attorney who brought Alex Jones to his knees with a staggering $1.4 billion judgment! I warned you, karma never forgets an address! Judgment day has arrived for you, you psychotic bastards!

@iCkEdMeL Yup was literally just notified

Weird stuff. The live that YouTube took down and was denied appeal, then human review denied, randomly came back up, and sent a notification to everyone 🤔

@MichelleBrodeu2 @JusticeMttrs Ask Ryan Upchurch how those anti slapp laws worked for him.

@kbeans713 @JusticeMttrs You have heard of the first amendment, right? Every time he " hit record" he was in a public place using his first amendment right. This site is going to go nowhere.

You’re on your own, Aidan. Don’t think for a second that you and Karen Read are going to fight this defamation case together. You’re the one who hit record! And you’re the one who didn’t know when to STFU! You practically begged the house defendants to sue you… and now here it is!

@MichelleBrodeu2 @JusticeMttrs Omg a lawtuber mentioned ANTI SLAPP the other day and now that’s all I see all over X! Yikes

@KYMaverick1 Well 2 TRIALS and not 1 shred of evidence showed they ever hurt John, that’s enough. Google Koskoff and Koskoff. Prestigious law firms don’t take on losing cases in fact they usually handpick their cases.

What “actual malice” actually means: Under the First Amendment (U.S. Supreme Court’s New York Times v. Sullivan rule, which Massachusetts follows), public figures cannot win a defamation case unless they prove — by clear and convincing evidence (a high burden, higher than “more likely than not”) — that the defendant published the false statement either: 1. With knowledge that it was false, OR 2. With reckless disregard for whether it was false (i.e., the defendant had serious doubts about the truth but published it anyway). They do not have to prove the defendants “knew for certain” the information was false — reckless disregard is enough. But the complaint repeatedly alleges the stronger version: actual knowledge of falsity. Why this standard applies here: · The plaintiffs (McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, Higgins) are limited-purpose public figures. They voluntarily testified under oath in a nationally watched murder trial, gave grand-jury testimony, and became central to a massive public controversy. Courts routinely treat trial witnesses in high-profile cases this way when the statements at issue concern that same controversy. · Because of that status, the actual malice rule kicks in for every defamatory statement about the O’Keefe death/cover-up allegations. The filing is built around proving actual malice: · Read: She allegedly knew the statements were false because she repeatedly admitted hitting O’Keefe (“I hit him. I hit him.”) and initially called the charges a “tremendous reach”/accident. · Kearney: He allegedly knew because Read (and her lawyers) fed him the false narrative through intermediaries, Signal messages, meetings, and doxxed documents — while praising his work (“GREAT f*cking show”) and coordinating timing. · They plead extensive coordination (189+ calls, shared non-public info, profit motive) to show the statements were not innocent mistakes. Practical reality of this question: · This is the single hardest part of the plaintiffs’ case. · On an anti-SLAPP motion (which defendants will almost certainly file), the plaintiffs must immediately show a probability of success on actual malice — or the case gets dismissed early with them paying defendants’ attorney fees. · Defendants will argue many statements were opinion/hyperbole (“cop killer,” “Disney villain”), protected journalism, or at least not made with reckless disregard. · Read’s 2025 acquittal on murder charges gives defendants extra ammunition for the “truth/reckless disregard” defense. Bottom line: The plaintiffs must prove Read and Kearney knew (or recklessly disregarded) the falsity. The complaint is written to do exactly that — but clearing this constitutional hurdle by clear and convincing evidence is a steep climb, especially in a case this polarized. This single legal requirement will likely decide the entire lawsuit.

@SaltySteno I personally find this to be worse for them than the OKeefe civil case tbh.

@kbeans713 Hope he likes it because he’ll never be able to sell it

I cannot wait to hear about the future of Aidan’s documentary funding now that he’s been sued for defamation. 🤣🤣🤣🤣