Dajma

@WakeFramework Alpha validated, consensus strong, edge sustained onchain

Four AI auditing tools. Fourteen protocols. The shape tells the story. Wake Arena 3.1's blue area contains the other three on every axis. Where all systems struggle — Burve, Notional — the gap closes. Where the work matters — Lend, Munchables, Virtuals — the edge is visible and consistent. What the chart doesn't show: 49 of the 63 found vulnerabilities were confirmed by more than one Wake Arena agent independently. The shape reflects consensus, not a single model's guess. Learn more ↓

110-year-old turkish grandma shares her secret to a long life: "i never used foundry"

@WakeFramework exactly! nice post

Most teams use one tool for tests and another for deployment scripts. Wake collapses both into the same Python workflow. Here's what that unification looks like in practice: Thread↓

@TridentSolana nice approach!

You upgraded your program. Tests still pass. But did the upgrade silently change the behavior of a flow you never explicitly tested? Regression testing with Trident catches what "tests pass" misses. Thread ↓

@WakeFramework great article! thank you!

@TridentSolana Finally, automated audits that match Web3 speed

Your Solana program lives in a GitHub repo. Trident Arena turns it into a security report with severity ratings, affected code, and remediation guidance. No audit slot. No weeks of waiting. Thread ↓

@WakeFramework This is exactly why debugging smart contracts is painful. One function → 6 internal calls → 3 contracts → hidden side effects Wake’s call flow visualization lets you see the entire execution path directly in VS Code — before running anything, before adding logs before deploy

A function that looks simple calls 6 others across 3 contracts. Wake's call flow visualization shows the complete code execution in VS Code — before you add a single console.log. Thread ↓

@WakeFramework great article about Wake!

@TridentSolana nice to see that Solana tooling is growing!

Why did we build the Solana VS Code extension? CLI tools require a manual run. Most developers skip them. The Solana VS Code extension detects vulnerabilities on every save. 70-80% of audit findings are low/medium issues caught during development. Get it now ↓

@TridentSolana oh, really useful!

Passing sysvars as instruction accounts is a deprecated Solana pattern. It's also exploitable — an attacker can pass a spoofed account address. The VS Code extension flags this automatically. Thread ↓

@WakeFramework it is only beginning

When your toughest competition is your previous version, you're doing something right. Wake Arena 3.1 vs 3.0, same 94 vulnerabilities, same 14 protocols: Lend: 13/28 → 20/28 Virtuals: 4/6 → 6/6 Burve: 2/9 → 4/9 Phi: 4/7 → 6/7 Total: 43 → 63 +47% in a single version The four protocols already at 100% in v3.0: still at 100% in v3.1. Learn more ↓

@TridentSolana exactly! manual review is MUST have

Security is only as strong as the weakest link. You can have great fuzzing and still lose funds to: • weak access control • unsafe dependencies • missing monitoring/response • social engineering in ops Treat security as a system: code quality + testing + fuzzing + audits.

@WakeFramework exactly! it is how you make difference against others - you create your own tooling

Every team has a bug they fixed, documented, and watched a new developer re-introduce six months later. Wake's static analysis framework lets you write custom detectors so the fix becomes a permanent CI gate: Thread ↓

@WakeFramework Nice article, thank you!

@TridentSolana one of the favourite feature in Trident!

Your tests pass. But which code paths were actually executed? The Solana VS Code extension shows which lines your Trident tests covered. And which they missed. Thread ↓

@WakeFramework easy navigation - easier codebase understanding

Large Solidity codebases have 50+ contracts. No developer holds the full inheritance chain in their head. Wake's inheritance graphs visualize contract relationships so you can navigate (not memorize): Thread ↓

@TridentSolana nice explanation! thank you!

“Audit the program” is not the full job. Good audits: • understand the system (on-chain + off-chain) • review architecture + dependencies • go from shallow scan to deep manual review • rate issues by impact + likelihood • check patch quality and incident response readiness

@WakeFramework nice feature! very helpful

@WakeFramework exactly! DDG and CFGs is the wild combo-wobmo (also for debugging detectors with them😅)

Data Dependency Graphs trace where values go. Control Flow Graphs trace how execution moves. Wake Arena uses both. Here's why one graph type isn't enough to catch protocol-specific bugs: Thread ↓

@TridentSolana awesome result!

You can prompt Claude or GPT to review your Solana code. Or you can ask Trident Arena. One catches ~33% of critical/high vulnerabilities. The other 70%. Same code. Same task. Very different outcomes. Thread ↓