Nate Higgers

@KryptRaider @SuthernGentry as a lolicon, i can say i regularly donate to local charities and volunteer for public work during holidays and special events. everyone in my town loves me.

@SuthernGentry Yeah man I'm sure this completely imagined scenario is what lolicons do daily

Apparently I'm supposed to pick a side here

@ogatairl white people wash their hands.

Oh but I thought eating with our bare hands is “backward” and “barbaric” ???

@deivisstrategus @centristpeater a cheetah is not very dangerous to an adult human. it’s more likely to run away than attack you if it senses danger. and if it does attack you, you can easily fight it off.

@centristpeater I would not want to piss that thing off

Name one single reason why I can’t have a pet cheetah

@centristpeater do you have a massive field full of small animals for it to hunt?

@GunHeritage @DAKKADAKKA1 let’s get it straight, Charles was not a troon, he was just a cross dresser.

Woke Dead Redemption 2

proof that nggers are more concerned about being called a coon than they are about children who are being beaten. and people think they are our equals.

@PKontwt Hound dog Jailhouse Rock The Wonder of You these are just a few

On your life name 1 good Elvis song

@theblessedsalt no.

Technically, don’t they, though? Just by an immeasurably small difference?

@ghostyectoplasm rape culture exists because women keep voting for the guy who wants to free rapists.

rape culture

@OsweltOrtiz why do you like making characters uglier? it does not make them more interesting.

I like when people do this! Revision of a drawing from 3 months ago

@cowboydivine @KryptRaider it’s not a drawing of a child. it’s a drawing in an anime character. it’s appealing because it looks fake.

@kikesareevil @KryptRaider that doesnt answer my question?? explain to me what people would find appealing about a drawing of a child

@s3tok41b4 not really, considering her husband and kids will also live for thousands of years. and she can still technically die in a fight

This is genuinely a horrible fate

We go legit🤣🤣🤣🤣😍😍😍😍😍

@icecoldjaayy these people are not going to shoot someone in a gang related crime

it’s only a topic of discussion when we do it ….

@DreaLeePower @MarioNawfal Rod Serling was unfortunately one of those “people”

🇬🇧 “If I criticize a Jew, I'm antisemitic. If I criticize a Muslim, I'm Islamophobic. And what are you, if you criticize me? What are you if you try to replace me?” He has a point

@YoSoyDavyJones i can’t even watch that scene, it’s so horrible. i was mortified

"¿Cuál es la peor cosa que ha hecho Cartman?" Lo que te dicen los normies // Lo que te dicen los que saben

@ArtemisConsort for someone speaking so much about physics, you seems to be forgetting about inertia and air resistance.

I’m tired of the Aristotelian physics slander. Yes, heavier object fall faster than light ones, all else equal, *when immersed in a fluid* which is every environment Aristotle had access to. Do the experiment yourself. Drop a bowling ball and a same-sized ball of foam. There’s a great paper called “Aristotle’s Physics: a Physicist’s Look” that demonstrates how Aristotelian physics is a special case approximation of Newtonian physics in the same way Newtonian physics is a special case approximation of relativity and QM. Aristotle’s physics reigned for so long not because people were unthinkingly dogmatic, but because it was genuinely hard to come up with better models. Aristotle had to model celestial objects separately from terrestrial objects because his terrestrial model is describing *terminal* velocity and breaks down in the zero-friction limit. So he had two incompatible models. Newton unified them. Now we have two incompatible models - QM and GR - and are looking for unification. The more things change…

@MadsPosting i love living in a nice small town

@MinusultraO @KryptRaider still not close. i don’t have a man bun.

@kikesareevil @KryptRaider i'm saying You're the 1 to 1 caricature in the image above

@RealPostFolder when it comes to something this childish and stupid, the wife really needs to just get over it. the husband is not an insensitive asshole just because he doesn’t want a bunch of trash sitting around his house. if that woman lived on her own, she’d probably be a hoarder.

So, let me get this straight. You observed a problem, and discussed it with your wife. Your wife expressed that the items causing the problem were important to her. No compromises or alternate solutions were presented or discussed. No resolution was reached. So you, unilaterally and behind her back, threw away items that she specifically told you were important to her. Did it never occur to you to maybe box them up and put them in a closet? Or put them on a higher shelf? Or any of a dozen other potential compromises that would remove the danger without costing her something she obviously valued?