Stefan Mischook

5.8K posts

Stefan Mischook banner
Stefan Mischook

Stefan Mischook

@killersites

Developer, author and entrepreneur going back to 1700's. ;) Mentoring people in the ways of code and freelancing. #unclestef

Montreal Katılım Haziran 2009
65 Takip Edilen6.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
Ai harnessing is the new programming paradigm. It is very powerful but very complex. As far as I can see, just as complex as the most advanced full stack architecture. What’s really interesting to me, an ancient nerd, are the completely new use cases that Ai harnessing addresses.
English
0
0
4
213
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
Coding has always been an aspect of software development. Not the full game.
English
0
0
1
139
Jaynit
Jaynit@jaynitx·
Jeff Bezos reveals why he thinks AI will cause a labor shortage, not mass unemployment "There's so many people who are afraid AI is going to take their job. I think there's going to be a labor shortage as a result" "All these smart people keep saying there's going to be no more radiologists because AI can read X-rays better, no more software engineers because AI can program better. These people are wrong" "What's really going to happen is it's going to elevate all of these people. You've been digging out a basement with a shovel, and somebody is about to hand you a bulldozer" "We're going to have so much productivity that a lot of people with two-earner income households, one of them is going to drop out of the workforce" "I predict we will actually have deflation of certain core things. Food will get cheaper and housing construction will get cheaper"
English
268
291
2.4K
500.1K
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@ggreenwald Claims about Ai have been greatly exaggerated because nothing like a doomsday story to drive investors. This is from the perspective of a 30 year veteran in software development. Ai is powerful but not nearly as powerful as the tech bros would have you believe. IMHO
English
0
0
1
69
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
AI is a technology that has been constantly and aggressively touted as one of the most consequential and transformative in human history, yet there's been almost no attempt to convince the public that any of this is good for them and their lives. The potential harms of AI -- wiping out jobs en masse, replacing most human functions, dangers of losing control of it, having it bestow itself unforeseeable powers -- have been more prominent in the discourse and are more intuitively visible. If anything, this growing public concern/anger is overdue. It should at least produce far more transparent and informed debates about where things are, where they're likely going, what protections are possible, etc.
The Spectator Index@spectatorindex

The Wall Street Journal reports that 'the only thing growing faster than the artificial-intelligence industry may be Americans’ negative feelings about it', and that the 'rebellion' against artificial intelligence is 'gaining steam'.

English
162
207
1.1K
108.3K
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@BernieSanders I am a 30 year developer with no Ai financial interest; the Ai tech bros decided to leverage fear to motivate people to invest … a very cynical approach IMHO. Having used Ai, and with a devs eye, I am comfortable saying that Ai is not an existential threat - not even close.
English
0
0
1
44
Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders@BernieSanders·
70% of Americans think AI is moving too fast. 77% think entire industries will be eliminated. 97% say AI safety should be subject to rules. Maybe, just maybe, it’s time Congress listened to the American people — not just the billionaires pushing it — and regulated AI.
English
1.4K
1.8K
10.5K
411.6K
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@laralogan This is clear, your physical movements will impact the brain. I designed curriculum based on the premise.
English
0
0
0
40
Lara Logan
Lara Logan@laralogan·
Our brains are being destroyed by technology & most of us have no idea how bad it is.
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

English
86
1.1K
4.6K
348.2K
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@elonmusk Have you considered licensing FSD to other manufacturers? Is it a good financial move for Tesla? That said, FSD tech or the like, should be mandatory because it will certainly save many lives and reduce accidents considerably. I have a dumb self driving car - it’s a game changer.
English
1
1
0
75
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
True
X Freeze@XFreeze

People completely miss the most important thing about Tesla FSD It’s not just about convenience. It’s not a "cool self-parking trick." It’s about the fact that car crashes are the #1 killer of healthy people aged 5-29 globally and one company has gathered over 10 billion miles of real-world data to actually solve it Look at the recent data: Tesla just became the FIRST vehicle to pass NHTSA's new ADAS safety tests. Not the first EV. The first vehicle. Period. The reality is harsh but simple. Countries that approve FSD get safer roads overnight. Countries that delay will literally watch their citizens die in preventable crashes while bureaucrats sit in meeting rooms debating "safety." The "safety" argument against FSD is officially dead

English
1.7K
4.6K
24.9K
6M
Merlijn The Trader
Merlijn The Trader@MerlijnTrader·
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Warren Buffett the greatest investor in history just repeated himself. 1999: "Euphoria is the enemy" Walked away from the rally. Result: dot-com crash. Down 78%. 2026: "We've never had people in a more gambling mood than now." $400B in cash. Zero purchases. Michael Burry: $1B short on AI. "Feels like 1999." Warren Buffett: $400B in cash. "Worse than 1999." Two of the greatest investors alive. Same year. Same warning. Same answer. Cash. Not stocks. Are you listening?
English
611
768
5.7K
2.8M
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
As the Ai stack continues to develop, it reminds me more and more of the paradigm shift I witnessed when the Web was in ascendancy. Ai development s the new development. Opportunities are mind blowing. 🤯
English
0
0
6
184
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
China is making great progress in the Ai race with nerfed resources. Perhaps an emphasis and investment in STEM education rather than the arts, has resulted in a much deeper pool of top-tier talent. The state bankrolling the arts, is probably an indicator of declining empire.
English
0
0
2
149
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
The improvements in the base models from my POV,, are incremental. The key today is in effective harnessing. Harnessing is the new programming language.
English
0
0
0
138
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
I’ve seen demos of GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7 generating websites; not impressed. They are basically smart templates. Think of combining a Wordpress template with Ai based text and image generators. When I saw the Claude demo website it had a distinct design signature - a template.
English
0
0
3
399
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Mark Cuban on the next job wave. Customized AI integration for small to mid-sized companies. "Software is dead because everything's gonna be customized to your unique utilization. Who's gonna do it for them... And there are 33 mn companies in the US."
English
156
355
4.4K
1.1M
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@billmaher Non-nerds easily panicked by Ai nerds cynically leveraging fear, our most powerful weapon, for marketing purposes. The pattern is the same. People need to stop responding to the fear card. It is ruining society.
English
0
0
3
279
Bill Maher
Bill Maher@billmaher·
I thought about doing this without any jokes, something I've never done here in 23 years, to impress upon people how much different I feel this issue is from any I have ever covered.
English
572
1.1K
7.1K
1M
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@elonmusk Having been in education for 15 years, designing curriculum and software to support classroom instruction, you are correct. The school system is so inefficient is it breathtaking. That’s why about 40% of public school teachers place students in private schools.
English
0
0
0
88
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Yes
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.

QST
4.2K
14.1K
87.7K
20.3M
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
@DavidSacks @MartinShkreli I call BS on this. The Ai bros are making a fundamental mistake of associating Ai with danger and fear. It will come to bite them in the ass.
English
0
0
0
61
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
The world has no choice but to take the cyber threat associated with Mythos seriously. But it’s hard to ignore that Anthropic has a history of scare tactics. Examples:
David Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet mediaDavid Sacks tweet media
English
221
404
4.2K
405.7K
Stefan Mischook
Stefan Mischook@killersites·
People think Ai thinks because Ai uses the same method we use (most of the time) to interpret reality: association. Unlike Ai, humans can actually use logic, we just rarely do because it’s expensive energy wise.
English
0
0
3
194