kittykat

@c0lettea @RealLuthen Sir you have no idea.

@kittykataleya @RealLuthen Ummm.... yeah I'm sure it's very upsetting for HIM to have a billionaire for a Dad.

This is exactly why billionaires can’t exist. This man is burning the entire world down because he cannot accept his daughter for who she is. And he has the money to actually do it. No one can have that power.

@danramblesand @RealLuthen It’s religion most of the time or similar intolerant views fed to them in their own childhoods. For Elon all it took was swallowing his own bs long enough to grossly over inflate his own ego.

@danramblesand @RealLuthen It’s almost tragic. They can’t accept reality they can’t accept the child. They don’t want to reject the child but something they have internalized into their ego prevents them from accepting reality and the child.

@c0lettea @RealLuthen Her dad is an actual mental basket case. This undoubtedly creates a lot of undo anxiety for her.

@RealLuthen You clearly have never SEEN his SON'S videos. That kid is a mental basket case and I don't blame his Dad for being upset.

@HartlandTCG @SethMacFairlane @SenatorBanks Or in simple terms the right not only disarms the victims of child sexual abuse it arms the perpetrators all while screaming about the need to protect the children.

@HartlandTCG @SethMacFairlane @SenatorBanks You not only rob children of the information they need to protect themselves but by creating a clear taboo around the topic that children do infact pick up on you provide abusers with a lever they can use to manipulate and silence their victims.

You have to be 16 to drive. You have to be 18 to vote. You have to be 21 to drink. You have to be 25 to rent a car. Why are teachers talking to our kids about sexuality at 12? Why are kids encouraged to mutilate their bodies at 13? This gender ideology madness needs to end.

@SenatorBanks They're taught about sexuality at 12 because that's when many start going through puberty and nature has a way of making them aware of it at that age. They are not encouraged to mutilate their bodies at any age, that is a horrible lie that only MAGA believes to be true.

@SenatorBanks You know who needs to stop? You and your ignorant moronic self

I find it strange that fully grown adults still think repeating elementary embryology is a moral argument. Yes, a human embryo is human. Nobody serious thinks pregnant women are carrying dolphins, oak trees or small kitchen appliances. That is not the dispute. The dispute is whether a human organism at every developmental stage has the same moral and legal status as a person, and whether that status includes the right to use another person’s body, blood, organs, metabolism and medical risk without continuing consent. "Unique DNA" does not settle it. Identical twins do not have less moral worth because they share DNA. Cancer cells can be genetically distinct from surrounding tissue and are still not citizens. DNA is not a rights certificate. It tells you biological origin and species membership. It does not answer personhood, autonomy, sentience, viability or bodily rights. "It’s alive" is equally weak. Sperm are alive. Eggs are alive. Skin cells are alive. Tumours are alive. Bacteria are alive. "Alive" is a biological descriptor, not the end of moral philosophy. The serious question is what kind of life, at what stage of development, with what capacities, and what claims it can make against the body of another person. The "heartbeat" line is especially manipulative. In very early pregnancy, the medically accurate phrase is "cardiac activity", not a fully formed little heart beating away like something from a greetings card. ACOG explicitly warns that "heartbeat" language in very early pregnancy is clinically inaccurate. (ACOG) "The baby has its own DNA" also misses the point with almost heroic enthusiasm. The foetus may be genetically distinct, but it is not floating in a morally neutral jar on the mantelpiece. It is inside a woman’s body, dependent on her circulation, oxygen, nutrition, immune system, hormones, organs, labour and risk. Pregnancy is not merely proximity. It is bodily use. That is why "society tells us what to do when another human life is involved" is too glib. Society does not normally force one person to donate blood, bone marrow, a kidney, lung tissue or the use of their body to keep another person alive. You may think pregnancy is a special case, but then make that argument honestly. Do not pretend "human DNA" has magically answered it. Nor is "every abortion supporter was once unborn" the devastating point you seem to think it is. Every corpse was once a toddler. Every adult was once a zygote. Every prisoner was once a baby. None of that tells us what rights attach at which developmental stage, or whether one person may be compelled by law to sustain another with their body. And yes, abortion is reproductive healthcare. You may think it raises a grave moral question. Fine. Say that. But pretending it is not healthcare because it offends your moral conclusion is just word games. The WHO treats access to safe abortion as a public-health and human-rights issue, and unsafe abortion as a preventable cause of death and morbidity. Pregnancy is not a sentimental postcard either. It carries real medical risk, including haemorrhage, infection, cardiovascular complications, thromboembolism, severe morbidity and death. In the UK, MBRRACE-UK reported 275 maternal deaths from direct and indirect causes in 2020-22, a rate of 13.56 per 100,000 maternities. So no, the reality is not "simple". The rhetoric is simple. The meme is simple. The argument is simple because it carefully avoids the difficult part. You have established that an embryo is biologically human and alive. Congratulations. That is the first paragraph of the discussion, not the conclusion. The actual debate is about personhood, sentience, viability, risk, bodily autonomy, legal compulsion and whether the state may force a woman to remain pregnant against her will. Calling that "basic biology" is like calling a murder trial "basic chemistry" because carbon was involved.

@aj_inapi I find it weird that you think this is a good argument

I find it strange that fully grown adults spend their time debating abortion as though they somehow entered the world differently from every other human being. Every single one of us started the exact same way. A sperm. An egg. A unique human DNA sequence. A developing human life. That's not religion. That's not politics. That's basic biology. Yet we're constantly told a series of increasingly absurd claims to justify ending that life. 🔹 "It's just a clump of cells." You are a clump of cells. So am I. The question isn't whether something is made of cells. The question is what kind of cells they are. A human embryo isn't dog cells, cat cells, or tree cells. It's human. 🔹 "It's not a human." Then what species is it? There is no stage of pregnancy where a human mother is carrying a dolphin, a kangaroo, or a toaster. The unborn child is human from conception. The debate is about whether that human has rights. 🔹 "It's not alive." If it's not alive, why is it growing? Why does it have a heartbeat, brain development, cell division, metabolism, and measurable biological activity? Things that aren't alive don't develop. 🔹 "It's my body." Your body has your DNA. The baby has its own DNA. Your body may be female. The baby may be male. Two distinct human beings are involved. 🔹 "It's just reproductive healthcare." Removing a splinter is healthcare. Treating cancer is healthcare. The deliberate termination of a developing human life is a completely different moral question, which is why abortion remains one of the most debated issues on Earth. 🔹 "Nobody should tell a woman what to do." Society tells all of us what we can and cannot do when another human life is involved. The entire debate comes down to one question: When does a human life deserve protection? Everything else is a distraction. The reality is simple. Every abortion supporter was once an unborn child. Every politician arguing for abortion rights was once in a womb. Every activist marching for abortion was once dependent on their mother for survival. Nobody arguing this issue today would be here if someone had decided that dependence made them less human. That's the uncomfortable truth at the center of the abortion debate. You don't have to be religious to recognize it. You just have to be honest enough to admit how every single one of us got here.

@IndigoS70031 @KimWahlman @libertarian_ass @_GirlSay Case in point despite our best efforts anything born before the point of viability won’t survive if that was an option don’t you think a lot of people would opt for an early C-section instead of an abortion?

@IndigoS70031 @KimWahlman @libertarian_ass @_GirlSay Having unique DNA isn’t really the boon you think it is either. Tumors have their own DNA .

How logical is this?

@FinalTelegraph You are a moron

Schools indoctrinate, they don’t educate. CRT, gender ideology, and 1619 Project aren’t optional—they’re mandatory brainwashing. Test scores are collapsing while kids are taught to hate their country and biology.