Kathy McCormack

@Cubes539 @commcenterpod @Imtough88 This is true. I always felt like they really didn’t have enough evidence and “knew” she was guilty and planted the taillight pieces. There is nothing to prove he didn’t just slip and fall on his own.

@commcenterpod @Imtough88 Dirty police, dirty house guest at 34...its a strange case for sure but corruption and framing happens all over the USA...

OJ Simpson: Not Guilty 🍞Alleged bad investigation 🍞Jury Tainted 🍞No one else has been prosecuted because we all know, it just took time for people to wake up. Casey Anthony: Not Guilty 🍞Alleged victimization 🍞Jury duped 🍞No one else has been prosecuted because we all know, it was obvious from the beginning. Karen Read: Not Guilty (murder) Convicted criminal drunk driver. 🍞Alleged corruption 🍞Jury tainted 🍞Zero actual evidence of corruption beyond gossip 🍞No one else has been prosecuted, but... sure. This one time it’s obviously corruption and that’s the only logical reason no one else has been indicted or investigated by anyone with a badge or charging authority. (And they continue to get away with it and the next FOIA dump will substantiate all of the ‘shady’ butt dials that make everyone else but Karen Read a murderer.)👌🏼 But the diffusers.

@Dan_Donovan_17 @TheChauffeurX @DonutsBaga I don’t think anyone killed him but the whole taillight thing is off. It’s very hard to believe that the home owners and numerous dog walkers never found a piece of the taillight. Only police doing random drive bys.

@TheChauffeurX @DonutsBaga agreed, why would they do that? Why not just pick one piece off and say you found it days later. Why call in the SERT team at all? Who did that? Certainly not Proctor as he WOULDN'T want them searching. Why not put John's DNA on the pieces? Who planted them?

💥I’ve said since day one, If they had focused on the coverup, and skipped the framing, they would have easily gotten away with it. 💥Now that the framing of Karen Read has been exposed publicly, the culprits have zero chance of escaping accountability. 💥NO SOL ON MURDER!

@GeauxTiger66 @factsdontlie10 you can’t get there that fast. There are two lights. CW claimed it took 4 minutes to get from The bar to Fairview and it’s a shorter distance.

@factsdontlie10 Witness testimony about times is really everything true to the minute, but we know Karen’s suv was leaving 34 FV at about 12:32 and took her 4.5 minutes to get back to 1 meadows

1. Karen connected to John’s WiFi at 12:36am 2. Jen McCabe first told police she saw Karen outside 34F at 12:45am when she sent John the last text before she drove away BOTH OF THOSE THINGS CANNOT BE TRUE. One is backed by data. The other is just “Jen said” I believe the data. Karen Read is and has always been factually innocent and was framed for murder.

@mauiswifter @AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv Three years later. Plenty of time to screw with things.

@AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv He provided a detail data-driven analysis to support their theory that Karen Read’s Lexus SUV struck John O’Keefe in a sideswipe/clip-style pedestrian collision outside 34 Fairview Road.

A 6 min masterclass from Hank Brennan while cross examining Dr Rentschler on how to create reasonable doubt for the defense while completely discrediting your expert witness! Absolute proof the CW had NO IDEA what happened to John O Keefe! 🤦🏼‍♀️

@mauiswifter @AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv So you don’t know how it happened but want to put someone away for 25 years or more? That is not how our justice system work. And if she clipped him he should not have had the injuries he did. Someone clipped doesn’t fly 12‘.

@AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv You don’t understand reconstruction engineering. There were too many variables to conclude how it happened. His method to a scientific certainty how he was clipped by the vehicle.

@mauiswifter @AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv The CW should never take weak cases to court. They had multiple theories because they, like us, really have no clue what happened. My opinion he went in the garage noone was there and rushed to her car as she was leaving and slipped and fell.

@AnnePiccolo3 @benchslappedtv No, that’s not what I’m saying—acquittals or weak cases don’t automatically equal “wasted” taxpayer money.

@WBruins15 @DixieNormu95224 I don’t know how it’s physically possible to work that many hours week in and week out.

@DixieNormu95224 It’s paid private details and overtime, his base as a lieutenant is most likely around 130ish

Looking at Paul Gallagher’s payroll history, for years the increases appear relatively gradual, roughly in that several-thousand-dollar-per-year range on average,and then suddenly there’s a massive jump into the $300,000 range. Now again, payroll totals are not necessarily pure base salary. They can include overtime, details, retro pay, buyouts, and other compensation categories. But when you see a long-term pattern of moderate growth suddenly turn into a dramatic leap, that naturally raises public-interest questions What changed operationally? Those are fair questions for taxpayers to ask when reviewing public payroll data. 17- $228324 18-$243779 up 15 grand 19-$249736 up $5957 20-$25945 up $ 9209 21-$267827 up $8882 22-LT 192501 down $75326 23- 322389 up 129888 He was averaging 8000 a year increase then A $54 thousand raise...

@mabbe_8 @jukeboxgrad It only proved that is when she clocked out. It’s too bad there’s no video of her leaving.

Devers' timecard proved she left CPD at 330pm, so it would be IMPOSSIBLE for her to have seen Higgins and Berkowitz in the Sallyport for a wildly long time at 6:00 pm. Get a grip, Juke. Again, human memory is fallible, which is why investigators place more weight on digital evidence. What are your thoughts on Karen's changing account about seeing John enter 34 FV? First, she didn't see him enter; then she saw him skip across the lawn, then cross the threshold of teh front door, and finally enter through the side door. Karen is a proven liar!

If you’ve ever wondered where the conspiracy theory that John O’Keefe was killed inside the house began, it all traces back to one man: Stephen Scanlon, a retired sheriff’s deputy and private investigator. Except that everything Karen Read, the defense team, and the FKR crowd have claimed about him is completely false, and the official police interview with Scanlon proves it. The Truth: What the Police Report Really Says… “I had no personal knowledge of what actually happened… Everything I heard was fourth, fifth, or sixth hand.” -- Stephen Scanlon On October 16, 2023, investigators from the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office interviewed Scanlon in the presence of his attorney, Tim Flaherty. Here’s what Scanlon actually told them, which (surprise, surprise) directly contradicts the story pushed by Read’s attorney David Yannetti and echoed by the FKR content creators and Lawtubers: Scanlon never worked for Karen Read. He offered to look at the case as a volunteer after seeing it in the news. He even told her he’d do it for free. He never claimed to have inside information. Scanlon told police, “I had no personal knowledge of what actually happened or who could have been involved.” He did not bring up Colin Albert or an ATF agent. Those names were introduced by Yannetti and his investigator, Paul Mackowski, during the meeting, NOT by Scanlon himself. He never provided a “tip” or firsthand source. His “theory” that O’Keefe might have been beaten was based solely on news coverage. Nothing more. He returned the check. Yannetti gave him a $1,200–$1,500 check to “keep his ears open,” but Scanlon consulted his lawyer and returned it. That’s it. That’s the entire “Scanlon connection.” Pretty boring actually, just like the story of a domestic violence incident of an unhinged girlfriend mowing down her boyfriend in a drunken, jealous rage because she thinks he is cheating on her. mabbe8.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-…

@iamthatgir967 @benchslappedtv @mauiswifter @GeauxTgr66 Yet Lally had the better result.

@benchslappedtv @mauiswifter @GeauxTgr66 This isn't worth paragraphs. Hank Brennan knows his way around federal court and the process. This is a fact. It was discussed and it's well known here. Karen hit John. That's what happened.

That’s actually an incredibly dangerous way to look at criminal investigations because the goal is not supposed to be “prove one person did it at all costs.” The goal is supposed to be determining what actually happened and ruling out other plausible explanations through a competent, objective investigation. Nobody is saying unknown DNA automatically proves another person committed a crime. That’s not how forensic evidence works. But when you have multiple unidentified male DNA profiles on a homicide victim’s clothing, combined with an investigation that failed to properly preserve evidence, failed to adequately document chain of custody, failed to thoroughly search or process the house, failed to preserve phones, and involved witnesses who later destroyed devices, deleted data, or gave inconsistent accounts, you do not just shrug your shoulders and say “eh, it probably means nothing.” That is exactly how tunnel vision and wrongful convictions happen. The Commonwealth absolutely had the burden of proof, but the defense also has a constitutional right to investigate alternative suspects and challenge the adequacy of the investigation. If investigators prematurely lock onto one theory and fail to meaningfully eliminate others, that matters. A jury is allowed to consider whether the investigation itself was biased, incomplete, or incompetent. That is the entire rationale behind what people commonly refer to as a Bowden style defense in Massachusetts which is what they brought second trial where the defense argued the police failed to conduct a thorough and fair investigation. The comment and the “they were touching each other anyway” argument actually proves the opposite point. If there are innocent explanations for DNA transfer, then investigators should want to identify and contextualize the DNA rather than leave it unresolved. Unknown male DNA profiles are not something you ignore in a suspicious death investigation involving numerous individuals present around the decedent. Proper forensic work is supposed to eliminate possibilities, not avoid testing because the results may complicate the prosecution’s narrative. That mindset becomes especially dangerous when the physical evidence itself is heavily disputed. If the underlying collision theory is being challenged, if biomechanical experts dispute the alleged impact scenario, if timelines changed, if digital evidence requires interpretation, and if witness credibility is under attack, then failing to fully investigate alternative possibilities is not a minor issue. It goes directly to reasonable doubt and is the reason the public is so irate still to this day! It has not just affected the Read case but multiple other cases in that same county as well as across MA. Justice is not achieved by narrowing the investigation until only one answer remains. Justice requires following the evidence wherever it leads, even when it is inconvenient. So if you are SOOOO convinced that your precious house defendants did nothing wrong then the question is why did they not volunteer DNA swabs home search etc m? The reason is as much as it pains me to say this is because they have protected rights! So did Karen except hers were violated through and through! My suggestion to everyone is stop being part of the problem and start being part of the solution!

@ReverendSpeck too many ifs.

To the FKR CULT and lunatic READtards (of which there are many) who refuse to believe that John O'Keefe did not get hit and/or struck by Karen Read's SUV in some way, shape or form without incurring any broken bones, you are sadly mistaken and grossly incorrect....

@BillGunn57529 @Jessica02474980 @mrscee07 THIS is just not true.

@Jessica02474980 @mrscee07 Except there is video of TB threatening Lucky. Lucky just wanted to be left alone; he’d say anything.

And WHY would Yanetti be worried about the Turtle not being able to contact witnesses???? 🧐🙄🤮

@Dan_Donovan_17 @turnright101 They have to prove they didn’t do it

@turnright101 Remember Karen is suing the House Defendants. In that instance she has to prove that John goes in the house. She can't. She loses. On the flipside They win million$ In their defamation case against her, as they just have to prove John doesn't go in the house.

In reply, In Karen Read’s crim case one and two, the onus is on the Commonwealth to prove their case. And the defense will respond accordingly. This is one aspect you antis failed to consider in your useless rants on social media. Similarly, in pursuit of a civil litigation of culpability against Karen Read, the onus is on the O’Keefe to prove that Karen Read was found NOT GUILTY because she used social media to promote or engaged in conspiracy tactics in order to win the criminal case one and two that millions of people HEARD AND WATCHED LIVE IN THE COURT OF LAW in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. In so doing, the O’Keefe relies on conspiracy theories argument to file a lawsuit against Karen Read. Basically, this means that the O’Keefe has to prove in the CIVIL CASE that 😜The FBI. 😛ARCCA. 😜The 12 jurors. 😜All the defense experts were in on the conspiracy. 😜Has to prove that John O’Keefe’s X-tray were manipulated. 😜The inverted videos the commonwealth presented in the court of law were all real. 😜The commonwealth witnesses who spent the nights on butts dials were not engaging in butt dials. 😜Prove that Karen conspired with Brian Albert and Higgins to deposed their SIM cards. 😜Prove that Karen Read led Brian Higgins to go all the way to the Military base to deposed his SIM card. 😜Karen Read instructed Brian Albert to get rid of his family dog named Chloe. 😜Has to prove that Chloe the family dog did not bite Officer John O’Keefe. 😜Karen Read instructed Brian Albert to sell his family home of over 50 years on a cheap. 😜Karen Read instructed the Commonwealth to taint all frivolous apparent skewed evidences gathered at the crim scene and provided the Police with the disgraceful disrespectful Solo Cups used to scoop an Officer’s dying blood. 😜Kerry Roberts who lied to the grand jury did not. 😜Jen McCabe who lied to the FBI did not. 😜Prove that Jen McCabe lied on the witness stand that she didn’t see Karen Read hit or clipped Officer John O’Keefe while she was watching Karen Read’s SUV packed right in front of Brian Alberts house. 😜 Prove that Ryan lied on the witness stand that he packed right behind Karen Read on the night at 34 FV, and Karen was the only person he saw behind the wheel, did not see a dying John O’Keefe or a live John O’Keefe, and confirmed that there was no accident road marks. 😜And Dirty Diller has to prove the attached never happened since it’s all conspiracy plotted by Karen Read using a blogger she came in contact with 15 months after the commencement of her criminal case one when all evidences were already exhibited and exchanged amongst the parties 🤣🤣🤣 😜The O’Keefe has to prove that the Commonwealth own witnesses, the good conscientious medical doctor who refused to accept that John O’Keefe was a victim of vehicular accident were all in on the conspiracy. Should I fucking go on?🤣🤣🤣 And you are still wondering why Bibi Fell is not showing face as frequently as she should in a global landmark case like Karen Read? You antis are so backwards and laughable to say the least for assuming that social media rantings supersedes the actionable evidence presented in the court of law. But on a serious note, I prayed law students take their time to use the antis mental gymnastics as a case study for future research. 🤟❤️🤟 #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr

@Dan_Donovan_17 @karenreadi52238 @JohnLorenz87787 Well why would John as a police officer let her drive ?

@karenreadi52238 @JohnLorenz87787 Do something about what? Are they her caretaker?

For those thinking there is no case against CF McCarthy's and The Waterfall. Think again. abcnews4.com/news/local/par…

@sherridale86 @MamaLama43 @TuesdayGazette Actually I have been bad mouthed on many occasions on TB’S show

@MamaLama43 @TuesdayGazette Everyone is laughing now. But they won't be happy and laughing when they say something to make Aidan mad, and they become his next victim/target for revenge. 😐

How do these people not realize what scumbags they look like? Oof. Please say a prayer for the O’Keefe family as they continue to endure the relentless cruelty and vile behavior they’ve been subjected to for the past three years. No family deserves this. #JusticeForTheOkeefeFamily

@DianaLasso1355 @MamaLama43 @MikeDury It’s a car. She shouls have just sold it privately

@MamaLama43 @MikeDury This is sick. Imagine auctioning the delivery van in the Athena Strand case? Or the glass Kouri Richins put poison in? This is vile behavior.

@MamaLama43 It is ridiculous. She just should have sold it,

@Barbara212SI @SpicyNotSacz9r @IzzyBleeding81 it was not investigated thoroughly or properly. Many protocols were not followed according to the audit. Abandoning the crime scene for one along with not separating witnesses, no recordings, etc. Personally I think he slipped and fell rushing back to the car as she was leaving

@SpicyNotSacz9r @IzzyBleeding81 Johns murder was investigated thoroughly. In addition, the Feds investigated and found ZERO corruption. Yet, you seem to think differently. Maybe should investigated the FBI.

It's sad people have truly forgotten who this story was about, not KR or TB it's about incompetent cops who purposely botched an investigation to protect the real killers of OJO. Corruption runs deep in Massachusettes but nobody like to talk about it.

@Dan_Donovan_17 @1_and_only_Wade No but it shows his character and makes it more believable he would plant evidence. Sad thing here is I don’t think anyone killed him.

@1_and_only_Wade So the truth is about text messages from 15 years ago?

Karen Read and her legal team are single handedly taking down the corruption within the Commonwealth of MA and MSP one by one and will finally reveal who really murdered John O’Keefe and covered it up. Tick tock mofos!! 😎

@Case1034521625 @_Kaustik_ @suspiciousauce I can't get into my whole theory but I don’t think anyone killed him. I think he was rushing to get back to the car and slipped and fell.

@_Kaustik_ @suspiciousauce I agree but that search didn't happen at 2:27. Plus you have Karen's vehicle with a broken taillight, you have Karen screaming "did I hit him" "I hit him". By the end of the day, the cops had no reason to think it was anything other than a vehicle hit.

If any FKR are wondering how there could be DNA from 2 unkown subjects on johns pants, I made a diagram to help you out. This doesn't account for the multiple medic personnel that also may have made contact with John O'keefe.