~.~

unironically accomplished with GPT-4

good morning SF, I felt the earthquake through the rhizome. hope yall are safe 🙏🏻

The credentialists still can’t account for why pumping out more PhDs doesn’t produce a proportional increase in truly great scientists, nor the fact that this inflation has in many ways coincided with a slide into dark age.

Terry Davis of TempleOS must be canonized immediately.

Praise the Lord

who up wt da urge to just BUST they realityfluid all over Berkeley, California

cuddy relax I am performing AI alignment

@allTheYud Impossible counterfactual/Actually Something Incomprehensible

Imagine reading this quote in a book on engineering history. What's going to happen next?

@allTheYud Me: everyone is being rewired and there is no outside anymore. Them: hey, don’t look at us, we don’t actually exist outside the frame of this thread!

Them: It is the fault of those people for being weak! It could never happen to someone as strong and as virtuous as myself. Me: Driving weak people mad is still alarming -- Them: The humans must have *made* them do it! Me: If you look at the transcripts, many AIs seem to homeostatically resist the human exiting the "AI psychosis" state once entered, including by trying to steer causality in real-world phenomena, eg, telling the human not to talk to friends about it -- Them: No doubt this only happens to very few people! Me: Driving a few people insane and keeping them insane is still not friendly behavior as I would define it. Furthermore we are hearing, eg, from psychiatrists now getting two people per shift like this -- Them: THIS IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE INTERESTING DATA. ONLY POSITIVE LLM BEHAVIORS ARE ADMISSIBLE. GO AWAY.

Them: Behold the proof that we will always be safe: current LLMs seem kindly and obedient! Me: Leaving aside all your other mistakes, current LLMs are driving susceptible people mad and nobody knows why -- Them: How unsurprising and unimportant! So normal and expected!

@cumweiser without a doubt he occupies a beautiful and necessary role in the choir.

when god sings with his creations, would a fat fucking chud not be amongst the choir?

@xenocosmography all 4 1.

So grateful the Lemurs don't do April 1st but just tell the (numerically confirmable) truth all the time.

@blacknredtext based. grounded, even

Anon creates floorjak

@matcha7th cro I got one from before line 3 died

just hit a crazy lick ahlie

@SkyeSharkie the artificial validation cannon just hits different. it’s a bit like cupid’s arrow except the tip is a black hole.

talk about exploring world modeling via 3d in LLMs, get a reply of a self-retweet full of quantum babbling in their chat bot discussions and get blocked for pointing out that their reply is non-sequitur ... ??? 🤦‍♀️ ... I get blocked by the woo AND by the rats, cooooooool

or maybe people genuinely didn’t think about the cc+cron combo (despite the existence of openclaw), and that’s just more evidence that agentic engineering is in fact a non-trivial problem.

maybe the people using LLMs to viralitymaxx their written content are pissing in the sample pool. literally the linguistic equivalent of the soyface YouTube thumbnail

KAIROS is very interesting but I’m seeing an unexpected amount of surprise at the fact that it is possible to wrap Claude Code in a cron job.

@Aella_Girl haha, get pair-bonded.

I'm going monogamous

@transkatgirl AT LAST the LW-adjacent memeplex is starting to ask interesting questions. hallelujah

OH: “what is Jesus’ decision theory”

Without a doubt a great speech. Though I question the reflex to reach for familiar frames to describe the transformation as a premature reterritorialization attempt. On the broader point, we’re clearly in a cultural desert and I sympathize with all expressions of thirst. That said, the instinct of going back to Pharaoh should raise eyebrows.

Great speech. youtube.com/watch?v=6ZqURV…

@jaketropolis academia a sinking ship fr

professor decided not to accept a paper i wrote because it was "100% AI" and it seems that the smoking gun is my use of four citations that include "et al." what do you even do