Kobin Kendrick

A new article I co-authored with Paul Drew has just been published: "Addressee points in conflictual interactions: A reductionist analysis of action". Free-access link: tandfonline.com/eprint/IXCAG9C… More below.

@MushtaqBilalPhD @RichClarkFHRS @trq212 I signed up for Max for a month. The usage is insane. Pro is like a paid trial in comparison.

@RichClarkFHRS @trq212 Pro.

Claude usage limits are insane Asked one question and it's already at 75% of the weekly limit. How is that even possible? @trq212 Would appreciate any help with this.

@sama Better writing. See if you can do better than Claude.

what would you most like to see improve in our next model?

In the article, we question the use of stipulated action categories (accusation, threat) and argue for a different analytic route: to observe and describe the precise configurations of social conduct, their uses and effects that constitute the basis for action ascription.

We also found that the tenseness of articulation varies meaningfully. Addressee points produced with rapid, sudden movements occur in extreme conflicts whereas those with lax, fluid movements appear in ironic or mock conflict in which speakers employ practices of deescalation.

A new article I co-authored with Paul Drew has just been published: "Addressee points in conflictual interactions: A reductionist analysis of action". Free-access link: tandfonline.com/eprint/IXCAG9C… More below.

@thsottiaux The new pop out menu with the Git command is weird and glitchy. It won’t stay still. Overall it’s harder to make a commit now.

What are we obviously not getting right with Codex?

@kr0der Medium, but I’m low curious.

it's been a week of GPT 5.5, what reasoning level are you using, and do you have fast mode on? last time, the most popular response was medium -> xhigh -> high -> low i'm personally using mostly high

@sama For coding they’re smart enough. Work on writing next.

i keep thinking i want the models to be cheaper/faster more than i want them to be smarter but it seems that just being smarter is still the most important thing

@sama You can also use both!

you know what all of these "which is better" polls are silly use codex or claude code, whatever works best for you i am grateful we live in a time with such amazing tools, and grateful there is a choice

New University of York style guide. This is an abomination.

@JustinBleuel @digitalix Now that you point it out, I see it. It’s in the composer box, not attached to it.

@kobin @digitalix It sends above as an attachment. What might make that more clear?

Pasting text should not suddenly become a file upload. This is such a nasty usability anti-pattern.

@JustinBleuel @digitalix It’s not clear whether the pasted text will be sent above or below the text you type in the composer.

@digitalix Say more? You can click “show in text field” to expand it in the composer but I’m curious what you find awk

Sci-Hub is an evil website that pirated 85M+ research papers and made them freely available And now they've added AI to their database to make Sci-Bot. It answers your questions using latest, full-text articles. But DO NOT use it. We should all try to make billion-dollar academic publishers richer. I'm putting the link below so you know how to avoid it.

@bridgemindai Bad benchmark

GPT 5.5 just debuted on BridgeBench. It ranks below GPT 5.4. Read that again. The "most intelligent model ever built" scores worse than its predecessor on real world vibe coding. #8 overall. 84.5 quality. GPT 5.4 sits at #6 with 85.1. Behind Claude Opus 4.6. Behind Claude Opus 4.7. Behind Claude Sonnet 4.6. Behind Grok 4.20. Behind Qwen 3.6 Plus. The smartest model in the world is not the best coding model in the world. BridgeBench just proved it. bridgebench.ai

@synthwavedd Hmm… They might just want users to park some cash in their extra usage, which wouldn’t be so bad. Or they might be preparing us for further restrictions that make Opus essentially unusable with just the basic monthly allocation.

$20 Claude Pro users will soon no longer be able to use Opus models in Claude Code unless they purchase extra usage 🤦‍♂️

@felixrieseberg It’d be cool if you could add a file to a project this way. I’d create a quick action and use it every day.

Tiny feature, also a bit of a nerdy one: We've added deep links so you can pre-fill new sessions in Chat, Cowork, or Code with a claude:// link. I like using it for composition in my workflows or adding "Open in Claude" buttons to other apps. It does require the desktop app. support.claude.com/en/articles/14…

@sama 🫶

1. We believe in iterative deployment; although GPT-5.5 is already a smart model, we expect rapid improvements. Iterative deployment is a big part of our safety strategy; we believe the world will be best equipped to win at the team sport of AI resilience this way. 2. We believe in democratization. We want people to be able to use lots of AI; we aim to have the most efficient models, the most efficient inference stack, and the most compute. We want our users to have access to the best technology and for everyone to have equal opportunity. We have been tracking cybersecurity as a preparedness category for a long time, and have built mitigations we believe in that enable us to make capable models broadly available. 3. We love you and we want you to win. We want to be a platform for every company, scientist, entrepreneur, and person. (My whole career has largely been about the magic of startups, and I think we are about to see that magic at hyperscale.)