Kruthi Ananth

Thankyou for your clean confession about what bigotry your religions teach. Once again, I am saying. A god who sent prophets only to the twelve tribes of Israel in the Levant, and one Quraysh tribe in Arabia, ignoring the rest of humanity for 3000 years since creation , yet punishing all of them with eternal hellfire, for not worshipping him exclusively , cannot be the God for everyone, who created the entire universe. A god who never incarnates on earth or would incarnate only one time at one place among one people, cannot demand worship from all of humanity. A god who commands and would accept prayers only in one language from all people, can’t be the god for everyone. A god who forgives all sorts of sins of people who worship him yet who sends away all others, who worship no god or other gods, into hellfire, even if they are otherwise pious, is not a god but a cult leader. A god who revealed his revelations only to a small minority of the world population and relies on the conquest of empires to spread his worship to all humans is a lazy god, who instead of revealing to every nation in their own language and culture and tastes, has outsourced his divine potency unto dirty humans and their brutal empires. If you still believe in this, it is okay. You can teach it and preach it inside your own churches and mosques. In public atleast, have the decency to not disparage the majority faith that are otherwise hospitable to you. I don’t like lot of people genuinely but I don’t disparage them or insult them in public and restrict it to my private circle. When it comes to caste or gender or race or language or ethnicity, disparaging and demonising that of another person in public is illegal. Then, why should the literal demonisation of the gods of other people in public not attract the same penalty? Like every other bigotry and supremacy an demonisation (w.r.t gender, caste, race, ….), confine your religious supremacy and demonisation of other religions in the private realm and your own places of worship and behave decently in public. It is not curbing freedom of religion but demanding basic public decency. How come demonising the gender, caste, or ethnicity of other people is considered distasteful in public, but how can the demonising the gods of other people suddenly become kosher or halāl just because it is a core tenet of your religion ? Btw this is the same law that holds in Singapore. Public preaching is not allowed; just invite people to your places of worship without denigrating other religions; once they accept the invitation and come to your places of worship, you can be as bigoted and demonising about any religion as you want there.

The real problem with this court order is not just one priest’s words. It is much bigger. Many religions, like Judaism, Christianity and Islam teach that theirs is the only true religion. This is not a rare opinion. It is the very heart of their faith. The Bible says Jesus is “the way, the truth, and the life” and no one reaches God except through Him. That belief is what makes the religion what it is. But the Allahabad High Court has now said: “It is wrong for any religion to claim that it is the only true religion.” The court called such a claim “disparaging” to other faiths and refused to protect the priest. Think about what this really means: The court is telling believers: “You can follow your religion… but only if you stop saying out loud what your own scriptures teach.” It is asking them to change the fundamentals of their faith just to live peacefully in India. In simple words: “We will accept your religion only if you first accept that your religion is wrong (or at least keep quiet about it).” This is not fair. The Constitution gives every Indian the right to practise and preach their religion freely. The court’s job is to protect that right and keep peace, not to decide what is “correct” belief and what is “wrong” belief. By saying “claiming only one true religion is wrong,” the court is quietly pushing a Hindu-style idea that all religions are equally true (what people call “all paths are the same”). That idea may be beautiful for some, but it is not part of Christianity or Islam. Forcing it on them is like the court rewriting their religion from the judge’s chair and enforcing polytheism on the people who follow monotheism. Courts should stop crimes that actually hurt people or create riots. They should not tell any religion, “Change your basic teachings or stay silent.” That is not protecting harmony, that is changing the faith itself. In short: You cannot protect someone’s right to follow a religion by first forcing the religion to stop being what it is. That is not justice. That is the state deciding what people are allowed to believe in public.

Cowards.

WHAT A BANGER FROM FLORIAN WIRTZ 🚀😱

wtf is Rashford on???

Traffic has turned our metro cities into giant parking lots with people trapped inside them. In Bengaluru, Pune, Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi and Chennai, on average a commuter spends 100 to 168 hours a year stuck in traffic . Not commuting. Just sitting. Every hour lost is an hour India cannot get back. Productivity lost, fuel wasted, air polluted, quality of life damaged. I stood up in Parliament and demanded a National Urban Decongestion Mission for our big metro cities with better public transport, smarter traffic management and a scientific parking policy. We are not stuck in traffic. We are stuck because of it. And if India wants its economy in the fast lane, our cities need to start moving.

Raghupati Raghava Raja Ram in "original" lyrics ..beautiful vocals by Bhargavi Venkataram ✨️ It's interesting how Hindus were fooled for decades in the name of harmony & bhaichara.

Chidambaram subtly said 'we don't have money to buy bulletproofs' My brain was programmed to consumed shit like this at that time simply because I did not realize the potential this country had. Wanna make the switch to India very soon. I can do it. And, I will.

Our jawans got bullet proof jackets in 2018 while Congress was busy doing scams for over a decade. You don’t hate them enough.