Kyle Schanzer

@Rome_Beast sick clip

unreal

@jga41agher I just worry his playing style of relying on league high usage resulting in being gassed on d can get them over the hump, although I said the same thing and they made the 2024 finals

@kyleb77 do i think the team as a whole is a contender? tbd. do i feel luka has been one of the 3 most valuable players in the nba this season... easy yes. it's a team sport. but if we're doing individual awards let's look at the individual impact.

If you don't have Luka Doncic in your top-3 in MVP voting AND first team all-nba then you deserve to have your awards vote stripped. Literally GTFO bc this dude has been unbelievable this season.

@bendreyfuss Learn how to cook it ya dingus

Cabbage tastes like shit.

They don’t actually eat corned beef and cabbage in Ireland because they don’t have corned beef because they hate Jews. Instead they eat bacon and cabbage because they’re sickos who didn’t help defeat Hitler

@ggreenwald who could have seen this coming

It's obviously one of the most pathetic things ever seen that Mark Levin was so upset by Megyn Kelly's mockery of him (after months of calling her Nazi, etc) that he run to Trump to beg for a tweet in defense. But far more pathetic is that Trump -- in the middle of a war he started where American soldiers are fighting and dying (none in his family of course) -- he found the time not just to do it, but to write a long screed about Mark Levin's greatness, as if he were Nentayhau or someone whom Trump really worships. But the worst of all is that in the first 24 hours of the war Trump started -- when at least 4 American troops lost their lives for him -- he found the time to talk to Laura Loomer about the conduct of this war. This is sick Nero territory.

@MrBellinghamUS @tylercowen sounds complicated, maybe everyone should take a beat and work with congress to figure out how to regulate

@kyleb77 @tylercowen Interpretability is a model design problem. Authority is a control architecture problem. Even a black box can be sandboxed, audited, rate-limited, or disconnected by whoever holds operational control.

"In the longer run, the legacy of Hegseth here will be to diminish the say of the military over AI developments, and increase the role of Congress, a possibly Democratic Congress at that. Exactly who is it that should be happy here?" thefp.com/p/in-the-penta…

@MrBellinghamUS @tylercowen would autonomous ai respect defined authority, how would you know if it did, it's a black box?

@kyleb77 @tylercowen If you don’t define authority, you don’t eliminate power — you just obscure it.

@MrBellinghamUS @tylercowen the road to hell was paved with "role clarity"

I agree the technology is new and high-stakes. That’s exactly why role clarity matters. Labs absolutely should advise on safety and capability. But advising is different from retaining override authority once the system is embedded in national security infrastructure. You can consult the vendor without making the vendor the final arbiter.

@MrBellinghamUS @tylercowen This is so naive, this is a very new technology with crazy implications, the admin should be listening to anthropic and other ai labs regarding how to handle not getting in a pissing match

Your framing misses the core issue. Once a company takes defence contracts, it is no longer a neutral market actor — it becomes part of the state’s operational chain. You cannot have a system the military relies on while the vendor reserves the right to say “no” mid-conflict. Even if the refusal is morally right, it’s operationally unacceptable. If Anthropic wanted full moral autonomy, the honest move was to refuse military work from the start — not take taxpayer money and attempt to retain veto power later. This isn’t politicising the economy. It’s resolving a category error about authority.

@SistroMondain @reason The technology literally didn't exist 6 months ago, how is it already vital?

@reason No private company will be allowed to have veto power over technology that is vital to the national defense. This is all ridiculous virtue signaling.

The CEO of Anthropic penned a public letter explaining the danger of the Defense Department's request to remove certain constraints from Claude, and refusing them outright. reason.com/2026/02/27/ant…

@robleclerc trusting that the us government has assessed the ramifications of autonomous ai by the duly elected officials is extremely naive

this is really a debate about power, who has it, and who decides who gets to pull the trigger and when. the fact is, the american government is elected by the people and for the people. it has a constitution and laws and process. and so while anthropic has developed these models, it still owes its existence to this country, and it is ultimately still subject to the state. especially when it comes to national security. could this be abused by the government? yes. will it be abused? probably. but that still doesn’t mean the government should abdicate ultimate decisions about national security to an unelected corporation. we still live in a democracy, there are still checks and balances and the american people did not elect anthropic to be the final arbitrators on this and so on balance the decisions they are weighing lie with the government as long as they are lawful. and if anthropic wants to fight it, that’s within their right, but the government has the right to penalize anthropic for not complying.

@mattyglesias maybe his knees are sore, not a fan of kennedy but he's getting at it

@StatisticUrban get a grip, this stocks been a dog

We're so unbelievably cooked

@joecarlsonshow how does citrini fit in here? he's long everything

What do you notice here?

@JamesSurowiecki @Houseofyogi Not sure this is correct, wouldn't your losses you write off be capped

@Houseofyogi If the card drops back to $50, you write off the loss, meaning the govt does, in fact, pay you back.

Unrealized gains tax for Gen-Z: You buy a Pokémon card for $50. Someone offers you $500 for it. You say no. You love that card. You're keeping it. The government says: "Cool, but that card is worth $500 now. You owe us $100 in taxes." You: "…I didn't sell it." Government: "Don't care. Pay up." You don't have $100 lying around. So you're forced to sell the card you love just to pay a tax on money you never received. Next month? That card drops back to $50. Your card is gone. Your money is gone. And the government shrugs. That's a wealth tax on unrealized gains. They don't pay you back the tax... Now picture this. Your mom calls you crying. She has to sell the house she raised you in. Not because she can't afford it. She's lived there 30 years. It's paid off. But some website says it's worth more now and the government says she owes $15,000 she doesn't have. So she sells your childhood home. The kitchen where she made you breakfast. The doorframe where she marked your height every birthday. Gone. To pay a tax on money that was never real. Now picture the opposite. Your dad put everything into his small business. For 20 years he built it from nothing. One year the business is "valued" at $2 million on paper. He owes a massive tax bill. He empties his savings. Sells his truck. Borrows money. Pays it. Next year the market crashes. His business is worth $200,000. He lost everything to pay a tax on a number that doesn't exist anymore. Does the government give him his money back? No. Does the government give him his truck back? No. Does the government care? No. They sold this idea as "taxing billionaires." But billionaires have armies of lawyers, offshore accounts, and trusts. They'll be fine. You know who won't be fine? Your mom. Your dad. Your neighbor with a small business. The farmer down the road who's had the same land for four generations and now has to sell it because dirt got expensive. You're not taxing wealth. You're taxing people for owning things. It's like getting a parking ticket for a car you might drive somewhere someday. They want you to own nothing and be happy. To fund the fraud, waste and abuse of the welfare state they created. There is enough money. More tax isn't needed. It's all a lie. But you've been gaslit into believing this is a rich vs poor debate. I hope you understand what's at stake.

@netsful probably right, but refs always give home team advantage in college ball

Darryn Peterson had one of the worst whistles i could remember in recent memory. So many times he was held off ball, and excessive reaching whenever he caught the ball, refs held their whistle and that’s also a big reason why his play was so bad early on..

@SBF_FTX Pandering for a pardon

Dems like censoring ‘misinfo’ on social media. Of course, 'misinfo' really means 'info Dems don't like.' They censored the lab leak theory (which was clearly true!), while making social media sites tell us to wear masks 24/7. Truth Social & GETTR have always put free speech first. @SBF__Truth" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@SBF__Truth gettr.com/user/SBF_GETTR

@TeamTalaricoHQ @jamestalarico Trading one Boogeyman for another is lame, do better

.@jamestalarico: I've had a lot of interviews with national media. No one's ever asked me about the cost of housing. No one's asked me about the cost of prescription drugs. The only thing the media wants to ask me about are trans athletes. The only minority destroying this country is the billionaires. Trans people are 1% of the population. Undocumented people are 1% of the population. We are all focused on the wrong 1%. Trans people aren't taking away our healthcare. Undocumented people aren't defunding our schools. It's the billionaires and their puppet politicians.

@FOS the salary cap is a % of revenue, more games would be more revenue

Kirk Cousins has one question about an 18th game in the NFL that nobody has answered: What are players getting in return?

@jga41agher so good, a true legend

Catherine O'Hara is so so so funny. RIP to one of the all-time greats.