Barbara Sage

133.3K posts

Barbara  Sage banner
Barbara  Sage

Barbara Sage

@ladybie11

"not lost but sad that many are." --socialist-- NO DMs please, I mean it

Charente Katılım Mayıs 2012
3.1K Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Dr Andrew Meyerson
Dr Andrew Meyerson@AndrewMeyerson·
Dear 🇬🇧, I’m not a member of any political party. I cannot vote here or run for public office. I’m just a doctor who is terribly worried about public health and can say unequivocally: your family is not safe with this govt running the NHS. #SOSNHS
English
916
3.8K
8.8K
679.7K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Chris Corney
Chris Corney@ChrisCorney1·
Labour walking away from one of the last remaining worthwhile pledges, to strengthen employment rights. Remind me why Unite wants to keep funding this party?
Tory Fibs@ToryFibs

If you vote for Labour. If you support Labour. If you are a member of Labour. Know this. You are part of the problem not the solution. Labour is a barrier to all the things ordinary people desperately need. Get out and run a mile. Do not look back.

English
10
121
202
4.9K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
GO GREEN
GO GREEN@ECOWARRIORSS·
The problem is not just climate change but human destruction of the natural world form forests to wetlands to the ocean to the soil overwhelming Earth ability to regenerate Renewable energy should be used to save Earth in de growth not to sustain a system that is killing Earth
GO GREEN tweet media
English
122
331
709
32.2K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Caitlin Johnstone
Caitlin Johnstone@caitoz·
Rename The Secretary Of State The Secretary Of Hypocrisy US Secretary of State Tony Blinken tweeted in celebration of Pakistan’s preparations for “free and fair elections” on Wednesday, a week after it was revealed that the US pressured Pakistan to oust its popular democratically elected prime minister Imran Khan last year. “Congratulations to new Pakistan Interim Prime Minister @anwaar_kakar,” tweeted Blinken. “As Pakistan prepares for free and fair elections, in accordance with its constitution and the rights to freedom of speech and assembly, we will continue to advance our shared commitment to economic prosperity.” An article published by The Intercept last week titled “Secret Pakistan Cable Documents U.S. Pressure to Remove Imran Khan” revealed evidence that the US State Department which Blinken heads had placed pressure on the Pakistani government to remove Khan from office in March of last year. A leaked document reports that State Department official Donald Lu issued blatant threats to Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States that “it will be tough going ahead” for Pakistan if Khan wasn’t ousted but “all will be forgiven” if he was, saying the US and its European allies didn’t like the prime minister’s “aggressively neutral position” on the Ukraine war. The following month Khan was ousted in a no-confidence vote, and he now sits in prison, officially barred from politics for five years. The authenticity of the document has been begrudgingly confirmed by Pakistani officials opposed to Khan, yet prior to its publication by The Intercept the US State Department had denied what was revealed by its contents on multiple occasions. Last month State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller said unequivocally that “the United States does not have a position on one political candidate or party versus another in Pakistan or any other country,” which is plainly contradicted by the revelations in the document. Obviously if you’ve got officials from the world’s most powerful, violent and destructive government telling your country “it will be tough going ahead” if its prime minister is not removed from power but “all will be forgiven” if he is, that’s brazen interference in the democratic processes of that nation. Yet here is the head of the State Department babbling about the wonderful “free and fair elections” in Pakistan. Earlier this month the State Department put out another doozy on Twitter (or whatever we’re calling it now), quoting Blinken saying “Governments that violate human rights are almost always the same ones that flout other key parts of that order — such as invading, coercing, and threatening other countries, or breaking trade rules.” All of which the US government of course does regularly. Such glaring hypocrisy is standard for US secretaries of state, because their job entails continually using concepts like democracy and human rights not as values that they wish to promote, but as political cudgels to be used against their enemies. This was explained in stark detail in a leaked 2017 State Department memo in which warmongering swamp monster Brian Hook was seen explaining how the US government views “human rights” to then-secretary of state Rex Tillerson — a newcomer to the DC underworld at the time. Hook told Tillerson that human rights violations should be forcefully criticized in America’s enemies, and overlooked in nations that bow to the dictates of Washington. “One useful guideline for a realistic and successful foreign policy is that allies should be treated differently — and better — than adversaries,” Hook wrote, naming China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran as examples of adversary nations who should be aggressively criticized for human rights violations, and naming Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the Philippines as examples of US-aligned nations where human rights violations should be overlooked. The memo was labeled “SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED”, which is a good designation for information about something that isn’t really a secret in Washington but they’d still definitely prefer people didn’t pay much attention to. Since we know this is the established orthodoxy in the US State Department, it’s no wonder that secretaries of state are always speaking in ways that run directly counter to the actions of their own government. The US empire doesn’t care about democracy or human rights, it cares about power and control. Paying lip service to democracy and human rights is just one of the ways they manufacture the illusion of moral authority while diplomatically undermining the governments they don’t like. For this reason it would perhaps be better to refer to the State Department as the Hypocrisy Department, and the secretary of state the secretary of hypocrisy. Or maybe the secretary of hypocritical finger-wagging, if you want to get fancy about things. The State Department was originally meant to be the counterpart to the War Department. The War Department (later renamed the Department of Defense to keep things from being too obvious) was meant to focus on war, and the State Department was meant to focus on diplomacy and peace. What ended up happening, as the US power structure morphed into a globe-spanning empire dependent on endless violence and aggression, is that the State Department wound up focusing more and more on manufacturing interventionist narratives on the world stage to gin up international support for starvation sanctions, proxy wars and war coalitions. So in practice the US ended up with two war departments: the Department of Defense and the State Department. Which is why you’ve seen the nation’s secretaries of state becoming more and more jingoistic and psychopathic, to the point where some sort of antisocial personality disorder is almost a job requirement for the position. But that’s just what the US empire is at this point in history: a giant, planet-sprawling bully with a severe personality disorder. The US empire has all the personality characteristics of a malignant narcissist — it sees people as resources to exploit instead of as humans to relate to, it communicates to manipulate and control rather than to connect and understand, and anyone who doesn’t center its desires as a priority above all else becomes its enemy. Couldn’t ask for a better face to place on that operation than Antony John Blinken.
English
73
919
2.3K
145.9K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Tim Walker
Tim Walker@ThatTimWalker·
Greatest respect for Michael Parkinson, but has it occurred to anyone at the BBC that no one much under 60 will have the foggiest idea who he was and there are other things happening in our country that ought to concern us.
English
729
47
792
236.6K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
RS Archer
RS Archer@archer_rs·
Our gardener has just been asked to stop walking around in our garden because he is, and I quote, "Spoiling the shot" This from a woman who is filming a video segment where she is standing at my gates claiming she is holidaying at her "summer house" My house !!!
English
698
2K
17.3K
3M
Barbara Sage retweetledi
GO GREEN
GO GREEN@ECOWARRIORSS·
Canada B.C.’s dirty little secret: it is ramping up thermal coal exports As wildfires rage around the world, Canadian billionaire Jim Pattison is doubling down on the dirtiest fossil fuel ricochet.media/en/3979/bcs-di…
English
2
46
62
2.8K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Rachael Swindon
Rachael Swindon@Rachael_Swindon·
I haven’t seen any reasonable argument as to why train station ticket offices should be closed & plenty of reasons why they must be kept open. Powerful people that rarely use ticket offices shouldn’t be involved in their fate. Support @RMTunion’s campaign to keep them open.
English
30
632
1.6K
30.4K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Socialist Voice
Socialist Voice@SocialistVoice·
Labour has quietly dropped key policies to guarantee basic rights and protections at work and strengthen trade unions – a U-turn that would harm millions of the most exploited workers in Britain tribunemag.co.uk/2023/07/is-lab…
English
2
41
51
1.5K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
'The reality of war is laying bare the contradictions of Western policy: If Ukraine is not allowed to negotiate with Russia from a position of strength, nor from a position of weakness, what stands in the way of its total destruction?' codepink.org/crisisukraine
English
4
57
107
3.6K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Tory Fibs
Tory Fibs@ToryFibs·
If you vote for Labour. If you support Labour. If you are a member of Labour. Know this. You are part of the problem not the solution. Labour is a barrier to all the things ordinary people desperately need. Get out and run a mile. Do not look back.
Tory Fibs tweet media
English
40
518
1.1K
58.8K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Prof Mike 🍉🇵🇸✊🏽 🔻Annibyniaeth
Fucking hell. I joined Militant in 1980 because I thought Callaghan was bad; we wanted a left leadership. But at least I stayed in the Labour Party. Starmer is so bad for the many that even the thought of him as leader made me resign. I've been proved right
English
57
166
582
23.9K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Rangzen
Rangzen@revoltinghippie·
Just Stop Oil
Rangzen tweet media
English
53
139
290
15.7K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
Joe Guinan
Joe Guinan@joecguinan·
A very important point is that, in the absence of both information/specificity and transparency, there is no mechanism for democratic accountability, either within the party or more broadly in our politics. Truly, they aspire to rule the void. (Image: @ta_mills)
Joe Guinan tweet media
Taj Ali@Taj_Ali1

Can any Labour frontbencher outline what the party's current position is on single status of worker with rights from day one? This is a long-standing commitment from the party that wouldn't require an increase in public spending so can't use the "uncosted policies" line here.

English
1
38
83
17.6K
Barbara Sage retweetledi
audrey White
audrey White@RedRosa91940184·
If being fully aware that Starmer has no alternative to Tory policies and knowing the dishonesty and viciousness of the man himself we still buy into the illusion that we actually have an opposition and urge people to vote Labour to get rid of Sunak we will end up with a disillusioned working class and thereby lies fascism. While workers are fighting back as they are - now is the time to expose the fallacy that we have choice that we have a democracy - now is the time to fight for a socialist transformation of society. There is no other way forward.
English
44
301
652
32.6K