Jonathan Cook

20.9K posts

Jonathan Cook banner
Jonathan Cook

Jonathan Cook

@Jonathan_K_Cook

Writer, journalist, self-appointed media critic. Winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism

Bristol / Nazareth Katılım Nisan 2014
109 Takip Edilen177.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
The genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in Lebanon exhausted the West’s moral legitimacy. Now Iran is slowly exhausting the West’s military primacy. Read my latest here: middleeasteye.net/opinion/west-b…
English
8
72
113
3.3K
Jonathan Cook retweetledi
Dr Iain Darcy 🍉 🇮🇪 💚
On the left, published in @thetimes today, on the right, published in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. Antisemitism is firmly rooted in the British political and media establishment, where it has always been.
Dr Iain Darcy 🍉 🇮🇪 💚 tweet media
English
20
2.6K
13.2K
228.6K
Jonathan Cook retweetledi
Peter Oborne
Peter Oborne@OborneTweets·
I've worked with Sanders for twenty years. He tells truths the media establishment dreads. Do listen to his thoughtful but quietly powerful manifesto below. I think his new weekly news programme can transform British journalism. It starts at 6pm this Wednesday on You Tube.
Richard Sanders@PulaRJS

Next Wednesday sees the launch of Double Down Newswatch, a new weekly magazine programme that will showcase the best of independent media. Here I explain why it's needed. youtube.com/watch?v=O8OBmd…

English
39
1.6K
3.3K
139.3K
Jonathan Cook retweetledi
William Dalrymple
William Dalrymple@DalrympleWill·
I'm just so so sick of ignorant media Islamophobes in senior positions of the UK & US media viciously going after anyone that dares stand up against the slaughter and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. Trevor Phillips notoriously got suspended from the Labour Party for Islamophobia, and you get the feeling, watching this astonishingly rude & sneary interview with @ZackPolanski, virtually the only senior British politician to show any sympathy for the Gazans, that Phillips frankly wouldn't lose a wink of sleep if every last Palestinian was erased from the face of the earth. He certainly can't see anything positive about protesting their genocide. Which raises the question: how and why did someone with such a record of toxic divisiveness ever get offered a Prime Time show in the first place?
William Dalrymple tweet media
Zack Polanski@ZackPolanski

When Jewish people speak out against genocide, why are our voices dismissed? And smirking while I describe someone Nazi-saluting at me isn’t just disrespectful - it feels deeply antisemitic. youtu.be/7VkfYJgLljE?si…

English
227
2K
5.2K
177K
Rascal Children
Rascal Children@InOurMillionsPS·
@Jonathan_K_Cook Basic reading comprehension is enough to identify the drive of your post. You can't hide Jewish supremacism behind ISIS. This is I how know you're doing propaganda.
English
1
0
1
86
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
There is nothing unique or strange about Islam. Islam is a religion, whose adherents are called Muslims. Islamists, on the other hand, wish to pursue a political project, and use their Islamic identity as a way to legitmise efforts to advance that project. Muslims and Islamists are different things. If that distinction is not clear, think of a parallel case. Judaism is a religion, whose adherents are called Jews. Zionists, on the other hand, wish to pursue a political project, and use their Jewish identity as a way to legitimise efforts to advance that project. Jews and Zionists are different things. Notably, with the help of western colonial powers over the past century, one prominent group of Zionists had great success in realising their political project. In 1948 they established a self-declared “Jewish” state of Israel by violently expelling Palestinians from their homeland. Today, most Zionists identify at some level with the state of Israel. That is because doing so is advantageous, given that Israel is tightly integrated into “the West” and there are material and emotional benefits to be gained from identifying with it. The record of the Islamists has been far more mixed and variable. The Republic of Iran was founded by clerical Islamists in a 1979 revolution against the despotic rule of the western-back monarchy led by the Shah. Afghanisan is ruled by the Islamists of the Taliban, young radicals who emerged after prolonged super-power meddling by the Soviets and Americans left their country ravaged and in the grip of feudal warlords. Nato-member Turkey is led by an Islamist government. Each has a different, and conflicting, Islamist programme. This fact alone should highlight that there is no single, monolithic “Islamist” ideology. (More on that later.) Some groups of Islamists seek violent change, others want peaceful change, depending on how they view their political project. Not all Islamists are the head-chopping zealots of Islamic State. The same can be said of Zionists. Some seek violent change, others want peaceful change, depending on how they view their political project. Not all Zionists are the genocidal, child-killing soldiers sent by the state of Israel into Gaza. The same kind of distinction can be made between the religion of Hinduism and the political ideology of Hindutva. The current government of India – led by Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party – is fiercely ultra-nationalist and anti-Muslim. But there is nothing intrinsic to Hinduism that leads to Modi’s political project. Rather, Hindutvaism fits Modi’s political objectives. And we can see similar political tendencies over much of Christianity’s history, from the Crusades 1,000 years ago through the forced Christian conversions of the West’s colonial era to a modern Christian nationalism that prevails in Trump’s MAGA movement in the United States, and dominates major political movements in Brazil, Hungary, Poland, Italy and elsewhere. The main point is this: followers of political movements can – and often do – draw on the language of the religions they grew up with to rationalise their political programmes and invest them with a supposed divine legitimacy. Those programmes can be more or less violent, often depending on the circumstances such movements face. The West’s obsession with associating Islam, and not Juadism, with violence – even as a self-declared “Jewish state” commits genocide – tells us precisely nothing about those two religions. But it does tell us something about the political interests of the West. More on that below. This is an extract from my recent deep dive into the misconceptions about Islam and "the West". You can find a ink to the rest in the reply post ⬇️
English
31
163
349
18.8K
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
@ZainabKirsteen I think you'll find Itamar Ben Gvir thinks something similar about Judaism.
English
1
0
30
2.8K
Zainab James
Zainab James@ZainabKirsteen·
No. Since Prophet Muhammad, Islam has been political: at its core is justice and the goal to bring humanity to felicity. That can only happen in the „ideal“ Islamic society, with an Islamic government. The first Islamic government was instituted by Prophet Muhammad.
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook

There is nothing unique or strange about Islam. Islam is a religion, whose adherents are called Muslims. Islamists, on the other hand, wish to pursue a political project, and use their Islamic identity as a way to legitmise efforts to advance that project. Muslims and Islamists are different things. If that distinction is not clear, think of a parallel case. Judaism is a religion, whose adherents are called Jews. Zionists, on the other hand, wish to pursue a political project, and use their Jewish identity as a way to legitimise efforts to advance that project. Jews and Zionists are different things. Notably, with the help of western colonial powers over the past century, one prominent group of Zionists had great success in realising their political project. In 1948 they established a self-declared “Jewish” state of Israel by violently expelling Palestinians from their homeland. Today, most Zionists identify at some level with the state of Israel. That is because doing so is advantageous, given that Israel is tightly integrated into “the West” and there are material and emotional benefits to be gained from identifying with it. The record of the Islamists has been far more mixed and variable. The Republic of Iran was founded by clerical Islamists in a 1979 revolution against the despotic rule of the western-back monarchy led by the Shah. Afghanisan is ruled by the Islamists of the Taliban, young radicals who emerged after prolonged super-power meddling by the Soviets and Americans left their country ravaged and in the grip of feudal warlords. Nato-member Turkey is led by an Islamist government. Each has a different, and conflicting, Islamist programme. This fact alone should highlight that there is no single, monolithic “Islamist” ideology. (More on that later.) Some groups of Islamists seek violent change, others want peaceful change, depending on how they view their political project. Not all Islamists are the head-chopping zealots of Islamic State. The same can be said of Zionists. Some seek violent change, others want peaceful change, depending on how they view their political project. Not all Zionists are the genocidal, child-killing soldiers sent by the state of Israel into Gaza. The same kind of distinction can be made between the religion of Hinduism and the political ideology of Hindutva. The current government of India – led by Narendra Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party – is fiercely ultra-nationalist and anti-Muslim. But there is nothing intrinsic to Hinduism that leads to Modi’s political project. Rather, Hindutvaism fits Modi’s political objectives. And we can see similar political tendencies over much of Christianity’s history, from the Crusades 1,000 years ago through the forced Christian conversions of the West’s colonial era to a modern Christian nationalism that prevails in Trump’s MAGA movement in the United States, and dominates major political movements in Brazil, Hungary, Poland, Italy and elsewhere. The main point is this: followers of political movements can – and often do – draw on the language of the religions they grew up with to rationalise their political programmes and invest them with a supposed divine legitimacy. Those programmes can be more or less violent, often depending on the circumstances such movements face. The West’s obsession with associating Islam, and not Juadism, with violence – even as a self-declared “Jewish state” commits genocide – tells us precisely nothing about those two religions. But it does tell us something about the political interests of the West. More on that below. This is an extract from my recent deep dive into the misconceptions about Islam and "the West". You can find a ink to the rest in the reply post ⬇️

English
2
0
4
4.2K
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
@InOurMillionsPS You're putting words in my mouth. All political projects exploiting religion are likely to be problematic, in my view. But if *you* want to make that argument about Zionism, you need to be ready to extend it to Islamism too.
English
2
0
10
252
Rascal Children
Rascal Children@InOurMillionsPS·
@Jonathan_K_Cook You're trying to whitewash zionism by distinguishing between "good", peaceful zionists, and ""bad", violent ones, ignoring that zionism itself is a violent movement that cannot exist without exterminating the indigenous population. Sneaky, but unsurprising.
English
2
0
5
275
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
@KingJalius Keep up! I haven't written for the National since I resigned when the UAE signed the Abraham Accords.
English
2
0
12
309
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
This is a term used widely in academia to describe a phenomenon of political projects claiming to be rooted in Islamic law. There are others: political Islam, Islamic extremism. Take your pick. I don't really care. But you do need a word to describe this phenomenon. The Islamophobes would love us to just erase the distinction between Islam and Islamism because then Islamic extremism can be treated as inherent to Islam.
English
3
0
18
436
ismail delal
ismail delal@ismailddelal·
Islamist is a racist term used to describe Muslims as ‘extremists’ inclined to violence and terrorism and was propagated by Islamophobic actors to smear any act of resistance and political action as ‘extreme’ and ‘terrorism’. It’s not a word that’s used by Muslims and is nowhere to be found in classical scripture. Jonathan you’re a great journalist and your work is valuable but you’re wrong on this one.
English
2
3
10
502
Chris SharQC
Chris SharQC@ChrisShar888·
@Jonathan_K_Cook Back when Lebanon was considered the 'Paris of the M.E', Christians made up 64% of the population. Since Muslims/Hezbollah became dominant in the late '70s, the Christian population of Lebanon has been reduced to 32%. Many fled to the safety of Israel. Many more fled to Europe.
English
7
0
5
632
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
Christians lived safely in south Lebanon alongside Hizbullah for decades. The Israeli army arrives and Christian homes are blown up, monasteries torn down, statues of Jesus smashed with sledgehammers.
Megatron@Megatron_ron

BREAKING: 🇮🇱🇱🇧 A video has been released showing an Israeli excavator DEMOLISHING The Historic Nuns Monastery & Christian School In Lebanon This is a deliberate attempt to eliminate Christian sites in Yaroun, south Lebanon.

English
93
1.6K
2.7K
64.4K
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
After the stabbings in Golders Green, we have been thrust back into a deeply flawed debate about antisemitism that relies on misunderstandings of Islam, Zionism and the role of "the West". Here I unpack the four most common fallacies: jonathan-cook.net/blog/2025-11-0…
Jonathan Cook tweet media
English
4
101
151
3.8K
Jonathan Cook retweetledi
Harriet Williamson
Harriet Williamson@harriepw·
NEW: The Metropolitan police will not open an investigation into 10 British nationals accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity while fighting with the IDF in Gaza.
English
478
3.9K
8K
932.3K
Jonathan Cook retweetledi
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
Keir Starmer says pro-Palestine marches will be allowed but only on certain conditions: * his government's complicity in the slaughter in Gaza is not mentioned * slogans don't use upsetting words like "Israel" or "genocide" * marches take place no more than once a year.
English
68
477
1K
26.9K
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
If only Starmer's government, the opposition and the entire UK media understood this very simple point. When we march, we are hating on Israeli apartheid and genocide – not Jews. They are completely different things.
Rosie Duffield MP@RosieDuffield1

For the millionth time, British Jews are not the Israeli Government. And antisemitic hatred/attempted murder in the UK won't stop Netanyahu. @Baddiel wrote a brilliant book on this - easy to follow and understand. And here's the doc expanding on his book, link below.(Dir: my OH)

English
22
57
169
8.3K
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
No, that's just something you made up in your head. There are a minuscule number of people – the latest with a long history of mental illness and violence – who are incensed by seeing the British government's complicity in Israel's crime of apartheid (per the ICJ ruling of July 2024) as well as a plausible genocide in Gaza (per the ICJ ruling of Jan 2024). The British and Israeli governments, the media, and you, of course, conflate Israel and Jews, leading that minuscule number of people to wrongly believe Jews are responsible for these crimes, and act in what they see as a form of "retaliation". They do so because of what Israel is actually doing, not because millions of Britons with a moral compass oppose Israel's all-too-obvious crimes. They would still commit their acts of violence whether the marches took places or not. Your determination to stop the marches is something else entirely. It's an increasingly desperate displacement activity, helping you to justify to yourself your support for the most awful crimes a society can commit. One day you may grow enough as a human being to look back at what you're doing now with utter shame.
English
2
1
2
62
Deborah Morgan
Deborah Morgan@Huttoneer·
So Muslims are being brainwashed that Jews in the UK are indistinguishable from Jews in Israel and if not for that brainwashing there would be no Muslims in the UK attacking synagogues and stabbing people. The premise of your argument is that the brainwashing of Muslims is being perpetrated by the British establishment and that without that brainwashing there would be no animosity towards British Jews from the Muslim community. Did I get that right?
English
1
0
3
69
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
Why, is our government backing attacks on Christians in Sudan, or condoning them? Is the UK government sending spy planes to help in those attacks? Are Britons going to Sudan to carry out attacks without consequence? Is the son of a UK Muslim leader taking part in those attacks? I could go on all day, but I'm guess you're not really interested in principles or logic.
English
0
1
1
71
Liesl_
Liesl_@_lliesl_·
@Jonathan_K_Cook @BevJacksonAuth Curious then isn't it that when I searched your profile I see nothing about the actual genocide of Christians at the hands of Islamists in Sudan It's almost as if you have other motivations.
English
1
0
7
64
Jonathan Cook
Jonathan Cook@Jonathan_K_Cook·
Predictably, you and everyone else are avoiding my point: the British and Israeli governments, and the media, continuously conflate Jews with Israel. Any Jews who criticise Israel, or march, are labelled self-hating or the "wrong sort". How does that not contribute to the very problem you say you want to fix?
English
2
0
1
42
Alison Wallis
Alison Wallis@alisonwallis60·
@Jonathan_K_Cook @Huttoneer Really. In my experience it’s the opposite. It’s entirely possible to criticise the Israeli government without holding any Jews to account for it and that’s the constant refrain here in Britain.
English
3
0
0
64