Krishna

लो प्रक्रति से उतना हे, जिससे हो जीवन पोषित क्रीड़ा,विलास्ता,सुख निमित्त मत उसे बनाओ शोषित वो मौन धीर गंभीर प्रक्रति अन्याय सहन तो कर लेगी। पर शोषण की यह मनोवृति मानव तुझे निगल लेगी।।

@sabeer This is not about nation it is about people. National Anthem has to be about nation. Lyrics are otherwise below average. No offence. But national anthem has to be something that brings you goosebump not some thing like school ka prayer.

If I were to choose a New National Anthem for India, it would be called Nayi Disha: नयी दिशा (Nayi Disha) अंतरा 1 हम बंधे नहीं बीते कल से, न किस्सों के हैं गुलाम, अरबों सपने, अरबों सोचें, भविष्य अभी है अनजान। पूर्व-कोरस न कोई जात, न कोई पहचान, तय करे हमारा मार्ग, हम उठें अपने विचारों से, रचें नया ये आज। कोरस नयी दिशा, नयी उड़ान, अपने मन से, अपने हाथ, हम बनाएँ देश ऐसा, जहाँ हर आवाज़ का हो साथ। न जन्म से, न नाम से, न डर से, न किसी काम से, जो चुनें हम, वही बने— भारत फिर से हम गढ़ें। अंतरा 2 न दोष दें जो था नहीं, न गर्व उधार की रोशनी, ये राह हमारी, ये काम हमारा, सोच से लिखें नयी कहानी। ब्रिज हर गली से, हर घर से, हिम्मत आगे आए, किसी नेता का इंतज़ार नहीं, हम खुद रास्ता बनाएँ। अंतिम कोरस नयी दिशा, नयी उड़ान, सपना नहीं—ये है योजना, सोच से, कर्म से, मिलकर हम, रचें नया हिंदुस्तान।

@SupriyaShrinate @Cthulhusmuffin Everything is not gender madam. Tomorrow you will start saying oh this BJP govt is so anti woman, they arrested a woman for accident- she was only seeing if the vehicle would go upto 80 kmph in Mumbai streets.

Irony died a thousand deaths BJP was protesting in Mumbai for women empowerment A woman lashed out against the traffic jam BJP first mocked her and now a police case has been filed against her. She was only claiming what is rightfully her’s - the roads of Mumbai!

@k210184 @darab_farooqui Each for their own. He may be right for you, for me all allegations made by him exist for more than 50% judges of courts - this way or that. Its very easy to file recusal against any judge who lives in this society.

@lambs_krishna @darab_farooqui For this particular judge he had strong points for recusal. Not seen him asking for recusal otherwise In fact ED asked for changing the judge at some other court once... Stop criminalising Kejriwal every now and then

The Deception in the Courtroom I watched this video at least twenty times. Not to find ammunition. Because I was sincerely trying to understand her argument. After all, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is a High Court judge. You have to take her seriously. What I found, after twenty viewings, was deliberate misdirection. Wrapped in legal language, structured to sound like constitutional principle, designed to make the judge appear as though she had answered a question she had carefully avoided. She made her argument in open court. It sounded principled. It was not. It is an act of intellectual dishonesty, and it falls apart under the simplest scrutiny. Arvind Kejriwal, appearing as a litigant in her court, had raised a challenge about conflict of interest. The judge's response deserves to be read carefully. "When a judge sits as neutral adjudicator, the parties appearing before court cannot question competence of judges by stating that since some judgments have been modified or set aside by higher courts she is therefore not fit to do justice. There exists a clear boundary line for judges when it comes to entering the domain of Parliament or state legislature and questioning certain aspects, except as permitted under Constitution. The same principle will apply in reverse - A politician cannot be permitted to cross boundaries and sit in judgment over competence of judge." Three problems. Each one serious on its own. Together, they constitute a work of judicial misdirection that should concern every citizen. Problem One: The Wrong Person in the Room The judge addresses her argument to a politician. But Kejriwal was not in her court as a politician. He was there as a litigant. A citizen. A party to a case over which she presides. This distinction is not semantic. It is the entire foundation of the matter. A litigant's right to raise a conflict of interest challenge is one of the most fundamental rights in any legal system. It exists precisely because justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. When a party says the judge hearing their case has a conflict of interest, they are not making a political speech. They are exercising a procedural right that the law itself recognizes. By reframing Kejriwal exclusively as a politician crossing into judicial territory, the judge sidesteps this entirely. The political identity becomes a disqualification. The litigant's standing disappears. A citizen raising a legitimate procedural objection gets converted, by rhetorical sleight of hand, into a politician out of bounds. This is the first misdirection. Being a politician does not make you less of a citizen. It does not strip you of your rights as a litigant. The reframing was not accidental. It was necessary. Because if Kejriwal remains a litigant, the challenge must be addressed on its merits. The only way to avoid that is to make him someone else. Problem Two: Competence Is Not Conflict of Interest The judge's first argument is defensible on its own terms. Litigants cannot demand a judge's removal simply because higher courts have overturned her judgments. Reversal rates do not equal incompetence. A judge can be reversed often and still be fit to adjudicate. That argument stands. But the challenge before the court was not about COMPETENCE. It was about CONFLICT OF INTEREST. These are categorically different things. Competence is a general question about a judge's ability. Conflict of interest is a specific, case-bound question about a judge's impartiality in a particular matter. The standards are different. The remedies are different. The rights attached to each are different. Even the most brilliant, experienced, and universally respected judge must recuse if there is a legitimate question about their neutrality in a specific case. Recusal is not about rating a judge. It is about protecting the integrity of a specific proceeding. CONT++

@darab_farooqui He could have easily avoided the situation. The benches change every July. He could have argued before a new bench. He on the contrary was trying to make an issue out of none. Desparate effort to become relevant.

That is the real problem. Not just one judge's flawed argument. But a system with insufficient mechanisms to catch and expose this specific failure, which is not ignorance, but motivated sophistry wearing a robe. Perhaps legal logic works differently from ordinary logic. Perhaps there is a framework, a precedent, a constitutional principle I am not trained to see, that makes this argument coherent. If so, I would genuinely like a lawyer to explain it to me. But based on every principle of reasoning I understand, this does not hold. The wrong person was addressed. The wrong question was answered. The bridge between the two arguments was announced, not built. That is not a legal conclusion. It is a logical one. And I have not yet seen an argument that the two are different things. And dear @ArvindKejriwal can't your team see this?

@ArvindKejriwal It seems SIR has worked positively. The rise in vote percentage is because majority of the ones who were removed ftom voter list were in fact non voters. The ones who are in list were voters.... so SIR has worked.

सुनने में आ रहा है कि पश्चिम बंगाल में जम के SIR के ख़िलाफ़ वोट पड़ रहा है। मोदी जी का SIR उनके ही ख़िलाफ़ जा रहा है।

@sabeer AAP was formed to oppose the congress. Anna andolan had support of RSS. Most of its leader from before were BJP voters. They were of same ideology. It is the party which chamged its ideology ftom opposing congress to becoming congress...

If Raghav Chadha joins the BJP, it just proves many leaders in India don’t believe in their own ideology - only in power.

@KhalidBaig85 😀🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😅😂😂🤣🤣 Hansi ruk hi nahi rahi......

Raghav Chaddha just did a Hamza Ali Mazari with his Rahman Dakait( Arvind Kejriwal).

@pbhushan1 You left when HH Ke...started to ignore you, so was with Kumar Biswas, Raghav Chadha similarly was being sidelined since his wedding as he suddenly became more popular, Swati was targetted. Others have reasons... you were not welcome in BJP, they are. That is the only difference

What is the difference between the first set of people who left AAP, and the latest set of seven people who have left AAP to join the BJP? The first set of people left when Kejriwal compromised the principles on which the party was set up. The second set led by Raghav Chaddha enjoyed all the perks of power, including being nominated to the Rajya Sabha. They have joined the BJP with pure opportunism bereft of any principles

@flor_enthus I have eaten THE tablets.😃

My first real sighting of Ginkgo biloba after years of teaching it as a textbook ‘living fossil.’ I’ve explained its lineage, its persistence through time (270 my) but none of that quite prepared me for the shock of seeing it alive right in front of me 🥲

@flor_enthus 😲

@flor_enthus Eat sushi😋

@flor_enthus Resident

@lambs_krishna R matlab?

Good morning 🧡💛

@FactCheckAsia @kishik1020 Good. But then why is the script not of Sanskrit. Please adopt sanskrit as your national language. You will find by the resistence offered that what you are claiming is not what pakistanis relate to.

@kishik1020 many languages evolved over time, Urdu is also a Sanskrit derived language. It will not change anything for Pakistan but modern india can't steal our history

Maturity is when you realize that Sanskrit is a language of the Pakistan region.

@KanojiaPJ @pbhushan1 You dont understand snything. Its not bajrang dal who brought the issue out. It was @ShefVaidya . Please do not brand our views under one name to push your agenda. ......

I am saying this again, India is no longer a country for free and fair business, nor a land of creative freedom. You invest your hard-earned money to build something from scratch, and suddenly 2-rupee Bajrang Dal goons show up at your doorstep to shut it down, just because you try to create a neutral space or say something that doesn’t fit their politics. The attacks on Piyush Bansal and Namita Thapar will push a whole generation of entrepreneurs to leave India. Economic growth depends on a strong ecosystem, and when people don’t feel safe to build or speak, why would anyone stay? On one side, Hindutva goons. On the other, what does the government offer? High taxes, constant Income Tax and ED notices, harassment of the very people trying to create jobs and value. And let’s be clear, this doesn’t happen without political patronage. BJP cannot deny that these mobs are part of the ecosystem that benefits them. You build something, and one day 100 unemployed goons can walk in and destroy it. Is this the environment we want for business and innovation?

@Manik_M_Jolly The plan was to take them to jungle. He would have convinced them to take shorter route. It would have been different kind of encounter...

I’ve seen Dhurandhar 1 twice now. Brilliance throughout ! Loved the movie and have immense respect for the director and entire team for their in depth detailing and presenting things in a very original format. But one thing I’m unable to make peace with. The final scene, the showdown between the big 3, and Hamza’s entire plan rested on the fact the Rehman Dakait would fall asleep in the car ? What if he had not slept and continued chatting or you know, just being awake. What was plan B ? H still would’ve taken the jungle route and made something up ? How he would’ve pulled that off to reach where SP was waiting for them. Can someone point out what I missed ?

@Jairam_Ramesh @abbas_nighat "Exclusive: Pakistan to partner with affiliate of Trump family's World Liberty Financial on USD1 stablecoin: Reuter" If India were to pledge its business this way you would call the PM and entire government corrupt. Its clear to the World why Pak is Trump's apple of eye..

बहुत जानकार और हमेशा स्टाइलिश कपड़ों में सजे-धजे विदेश मंत्री ने जिसे ‘दलाल’ देश बताया था, वही आज अमेरिका-ईरान शांति वार्ता के दूसरे दौर की मेजबानी कर रहा है-ऐसी खबरें हैं। 12 अप्रैल को इन वार्ताओं के पहले दौर के पूरा होने के बाद, पाकिस्तान ने सऊदी अरब और कतर से 6 अरब डॉलर उधार लिए, ताकि संयुक्त अरब अमीरात से लिए गए 3.5 अरब डॉलर के कर्ज को चुका सके और 1.43 अरब डॉलर के यूरोबॉन्ड की एक किश्त का भुगतान कर सके। पाकिस्तान की अर्थव्यवस्था स्पष्ट रूप से गंभीर संकट में है और वह मित्र देशों द्वारा दी जाने वाली सहायता पर निर्भर है। लेकिन फिलहाल वह एक महत्वपूर्ण कूटनीतिक भूमिका निभा रहा है-जबकि उसने ओसामा बिन लादेन और अन्य आतंकवादियों को शरण दी, अफगानिस्तान में ड्रग रिहैबिलिटेशन केंद्रों पर बमबारी की, और हाल ही में एक वर्ष पहले पहलगाम आतंकी हमले की साजिश रची। यह पूरी तरह स्पष्ट है कि प्रधानमंत्री मोदी की क्षेत्रीय और वैश्विक कूटनीति के सार और शैली, तथा नैरेटिव प्रबंधन, पाकिस्तान को अलग-थलग करने में विफल रहे हैं-जबकि उसे एक बिल्कुल नई छवि मिल गई है, जो नवंबर 2008 के मुंबई आतंकी हमलों के बाद डॉ. मनमोहन सिंह द्वारा हासिल स्थिति से उलट है। यह भारत के लिए विशेष रूप से बड़ा झटका है कि फील्ड मार्शल आसिम मुनीर-जिसके भड़काऊ और उत्तेजक बयानों ने पहलगाम आतंकी हमले को हवा दी-अब राष्ट्रपति ट्रंप का इतना पसंदीदा बन गया है। यह भी स्पष्ट है कि फील्ड मार्शल और उसके साथियों ने ट्रंप के परिवार और करीबी साथियों के इकोसिस्टम को संभालने में भारत की तुलना में कहीं अधिक सफलता पाई है। यह भी पीएम मोदी की विदेश नीति के लिए एक बहुत बड़ा झटका है। भारत को अपनी कूटनीतिक रणनीति और तौर-तरीकों में व्यापक बदलाव की जरूरत है-जिसके लिए पीएम मोदी बिल्कुल भी सक्षम नहीं हैं।

@BBCWorld "Since 2014, the NARENDER MODI government has splashed out over $26bn on building metro connectivity across nearly two dozen Indian cities." This is their agenda. Metro started in India in 2002. Everything before 2014 was good. After that @BBCWorld stopped liking the Metro. O.R.

India has splurged billions on metro trains. But where are the commuters? bbc.in/4mIaUcL

@The_Tradesman1 @BBCWorld Do not ignore. Read and expose tgeir lies

@BBCWorld These are China funded left-islamic hit jobs on India folks. Ignore BBC, Bloomberg, Reuters, Al Jazeera international media houses like the plague.