Max Prestige Larper

Literally crying at self check out bc the pads I need are 21 dollars and like, i need them. It isnt fai

No ❤️

CRAZY: 🇨🇳 Under China's divorce law updates, a wife cannot claim assets solely in the husband's name without proving joint involvement.

Do you believe that people on the opposite side of your political spectrum are less intelligent overall? If so, why?

I struggle to imagine a scenario where a man with academic education (especially in highly valued fields like medicine, science or tech) would come online and say his blue collar wife with no degree is much smarter than him

I’m gonna keep saying it until it’s commonplace: MARRIAGE WAS AN INSTITUTION SET UP TO ENSURE THAT EVEN THE POOREST OF MEN HAD A SLAVE Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

If you coerced a woman or girl into sex and she gave in, congratulations that's rape. Unless it's an enthusiastic yes, it's a no. Bullying someone to get what you want is still a no.

I don’t usually generalize , but… most successful men have a wife. most successful women are single. why do you think that is?

If women having jobs ruined civilization, then it wasn't very civilized to begin with.

We need woman exclusionary radical feminism. just a buncha dudes bro'ing out, cracking open a couple cold beers and discussing their favorite feminist literature.

straight women stop infantilizing yourself for a man STAND THE FUCK UP

A lot of the problems in the world right now can be explained by this video. For one thing, it’s a big reason why the US government is so unaccountable to public opinion. These are *college students.* A significant amount of the country is totally checked out and comfortable enough not to think it matters.

Fascinating things happening in this thread. Numerous people arguing with really very simple literacy questions as if they are 'impossible.' Having been an online writer for some time now, I know that true literacy rates are far lower than we'd think. For example, here on X you have the famous "So thou hates waffles?" phenomenon. Personally, I also observe an insane rate of people who argue with me by saying the exact same thing that I just said. I'll have people bring up completely unrelated things, and others just rant incomprehensible drivel. You can be as explicitly and perfectly clear as humanly possible, and someone will still aggressively misunderstand what you said. There's nothing that can be done to ensure 100% clarity. Its just not possible. So, I am not shocked at all by how many people in the replies cannot answer the questions, but what strikes me is the manner in which they cope. "These are trick questions. What does the word 'line' mean?" Rather than accept that their reading comprehension just isn't very good, these folks insist the test itself must be the problem. "I'm educated!" they think. "I've been reading my whole life!" And you would think that, as we're on a text-based platform, people would be able to read, but no. Functional literacy and bare minimal pseudo-literacy seen to be very different things. Separate from that is the implication this raises. Based on your experience with people, with this thread, and these tests, I encourage you to ask yourself: What is more likely of these two scenarios? ---------------- Scenario A John Southern, a White male poll volunteer who typically works on the local peanut farm, reads over Ms. Jackson's poll test. He's annoyed. The old bat finally got everything right. He's stumped, but determined. He'll be dead, cold and in the ground before a single Black vote is cast on his watch. He grins a devilish grin as he spots his solution. "Oh, I'm sorry Ms. Jackson. You drew a circle when the question clearly says 'line.' I'm afraid you're gonna have to wait until next election to try again. No, ma'am, I'm sorry, I can't explain the difference, its against the rules." Ms. Jackson sadly lowers her head and turns to walk out the door. Mr. Southern's grin spreads across his whole face as he sees a job well done. ---------------- Scenario B Ethel Freeman takes a voting test. She has ten minutes, and uses nine of them. She's careful not to run out of time, but focuses very hard to get her answers right. The test is incomprehensible. It feels like its full of trick questions. She knows in her heart that because she is Black there is just no way that they're gonna let her vote, but she tries her best to give no excuse for them to deny her. When Mr. Southern informs her she failed, she can't understand how. She gets frustrated. She knows its because she's Black. How do you draw a 'line' around something?! Its rigged against her! As Mr. Southern makes his excuses, patronizing her by presuming to explain basic sentence structure as if she doesn't already know it, Ms. Freeman storms out and heads strait to tell her gals. She's going to tell everyone about how perfectly she answered everything and that the poll workers are just racists who will make up any excuse to deny Blacks a pass on the test. Word will spread and maybe when Congress hears about it through Dr. King they'll pass a law getting rid of these rigged tests. ---------------- Set aside what you think you know about the circumstances of the time for a moment, just base this thought experiment on your personal experiences with quasi-literates online and IRL. What do you think was more likely to be a real scenario?