Toby Sterling

4.4K posts

Toby Sterling banner
Toby Sterling

Toby Sterling

@lbsterling

Hardly ever serious

Katılım Mart 2007
1.2K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Toby Sterling
Toby Sterling@lbsterling·
@gavinandresen Is saying “epistemic humility” better than saying “looks like somebody has a case of the Mondays”?
GIF
English
0
0
0
229
Gavin Andresen
Gavin Andresen@gavinandresen·
I’m extremely skeptical of anybody who uses the phrase ‘epistemic humility’. They’re saying “I’m really quite humble, I’m not a know-it-all”… but also “look at these big-ass fancy words I know!!!”
English
26
2
77
11.9K
Dr_Gingerballs
Dr_Gingerballs@Dr_Gingerballs·
AI must be inflationary because it must lower productivity. This statement is built on fundamentals of statistics. People thought I was crazy for saying it two years ago, but I knew it must be so.
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔McDonald's removed its AI-generated Christmas commercial after it went viral for being terrible. TBWA and The Sweetshop, the agency and production company behind the ad, tried to scrub it from the internet along with a defensive statement from Sweetshop's CEO. The statement claimed "for seven weeks, we hardly slept, with up to 10 of our in-house AI and post specialists working in lockstep with the directors." McDonald's responded by blaming its Netherlands branch and insisting any coverage reference "McDonald's Netherlands" for accuracy. The company's parent, Omnicom, recently became the largest advertising firm in the world and announced it was laying off 4,000 employees while expanding its proprietary AI virtual assistant and in-house generative AI systems. My Take McDonald's spent seven weeks with 10 specialists working around the clock to produce an AI commercial so bad they had to pull it down and scrub it from the internet. The Sweetshop's defensive statement about how hard they worked makes it worse, not better. If you need 10 people barely sleeping for seven weeks to wrangle AI into producing 45 seconds of content, you should have just hired a traditional production crew. It would have been faster, cheaper, and better. The most telling part is McDonald's desperately trying to blame the Netherlands branch and insisting media outlets specify "McDonald's Netherlands" in coverage. That's damage control for a test that failed. Global brands give international segments freedom to test innovations in smaller markets before scaling them up. I think McDonald's Netherlands was the guinea pig for AI commercials that headquarters wanted to roll out globally if they worked. They didn't, so now it's all about containing the fallout. Omnicom laying off 4,000 employees while expanding AI systems shows the real motivation. These firms want AI to become the norm so they can cut human employees and maintain margins. The problem is the output is trash and audiences hate it. Companies keep trying anyway because the financial incentive to replace workers is too strong, even when the product is worse and customers reject it. Hedgie🤗

English
2
4
76
10.9K
Nick Szabo
Nick Szabo@NickSzabo4·
Corporatism vs. socialism: an awful dichotomy, like Odysseus having to choose between having his ships destroyed by rocks if he steered them a bit too far north, and being sucked in by a whirlpool if they went a bit too far south. Innovations at large social scales -- and I daresay I helped a bit with that myself -- have often been a great economic boon for mankind. Innovations in contract law, property law, financial markets, and related areas have, after maturation, often turned out to be quite beneficial, with a net benefit when non-beneficial innovations are discarded. Currently, more trust-minimized institutions at global scale, taking advantages of blockchains, smart contracts, AI, and many other innovations, will continue to improve global economies. But in some ways the focus on large scales in politics and economics alike has gone too far, especially in the form of remote trust-based institutions, especially remote governments and global corporations. The 20th century emphasis on steering peoples' lives into the maws of corporations and remote governments alike has caused most of the cultural ills for which we now seek solutions. Besides innovations that, for certain important functions, substitute verification and nonviolent security for trust in strangers at arge social scales, we also need to reduce trust in strangers by refocusing our political attentions, and cultural attentions more generally, on smaller social scales. The main way to avoid the hazards of corporatism and large-scale socialism alike, is instead of obsessing so much over useful but narrow desiderata of the large social scales, such as GDP, economic productivity, and the like, let's pay more attention, politically and otherwise, to the many other important aspects of our lives and cultures -- particularly the ones that are closer to ourselves, the ones we can observe directly and have more immediate and legible influences over -- life at smaller social scales. Life at home, life in our extended families, life with our friends, life in our churches et. al. Let's obsess less about economics as an abstract goal. Let's do more to ensure that our economic institutions protect our more important smaller scale institutions. Let's have less of *both* big remote corporations and big remote governments, and more families, more local communities (including online communities) . Let's slowly grow -- it necessarily has to be slow -- the kinds of communities that have a great deal of long-standing shared understandings, i.e. of traditions, and thus of fullsome abilities to *communicate*. Let's protect such communities as we still have after the devastations both corporatism and large-scale socialism inficted in the 20th century. The damages inflicted by strangers, businessmen and politicians alike, pretending to be your friends. Let's have more time and resources devoted to the smaller, more intimate, more legible, more controllable, smaller social scales. Let's put political priority on forming, growing, and protecting families, and protecting actual, communicating, via long-hared understandings, *communities*. Protect long-standing religions, both the ancient beliefs and practices, and protect our other long-standing non-commercial traditions. Protect them from the massive disruptions caused by corporations and remote governments alike. especially protect them from the various manifestations of globalization such as immigration and more general disruptions of communities, cultures, and careers.
Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen Reports@honestpollster

With what? Corporatism?

English
100
88
493
118.3K
Toby Sterling
Toby Sterling@lbsterling·
@jitsegroen Is this for real ? Move fast and break things not exactly the European way ….
English
0
0
3
341
Jitse Groen
Jitse Groen@jitsegroen·
Our robot dog getting arrested is probably part of the innovation problem in Europe 😂
Jitse Groen tweet media
English
15
20
126
32.8K
Ben Coates
Ben Coates@bencoates1·
Despite amazing bike lanes, Dutch bike injuries continues to rise. Government has set ambitious goal to have 25% of cyclists wear a helmet in 10 years’ time, up from 4% now. But cyclists aren’t happy. Telling Dutch to wear a helmet is like telling Brits to wear gloves in the pub
Ben Coates tweet media
English
14
4
42
3K
Andrew Fleischman
Andrew Fleischman@ASFleischman·
my favorite joke of all time
Andrew Fleischman tweet mediaAndrew Fleischman tweet media
English
59
276
5.3K
224K
Toby Sterling retweetledi
European Defense Tech
European Defense Tech@Eurodefensetech·
Looks like that was us gathering 200+ folks for the European Defense Tech Hackathon last weekend, hosted by @DeltaQuadUAV 🫡 "A weekend hackathon in Amsterdam aimed at finding fast-and-cheap battlefield solutions for Ukraine drew more than 100 young programmers and engineers, with many saying Europe's rearmament plans were prompting them to consider careers in defence." Huge thanks to Toby Sterling @lbsterling from @Reuters for covering the event! And huge thanks to our partners @BRAVE1ua, NUNC Capital, BSS Holland, @DeltaQuadUAV, @NADindustries, @KeenVP, the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine @DefenceU, @Ultimaker, Pilotix, and our co-organizers Avalor AI, DroneAid Collective, and @inflectionxyz
European Defense Tech tweet media
English
1
4
14
570
Toby Sterling
Toby Sterling@lbsterling·
@AlexanderNL It is incredibly valuable to have someone delivering this message, the big picture, to the Dutch public.
English
0
0
0
41
Alexander Klöpping
Alexander Klöpping@AlexanderNL·
Terwijl Silicon Valley miljarden investeert in autonome defensiesystemen, blijft Europa achter. We hebben het talent en de middelen, maar missen visie.
Nederlands
15
9
97
15.8K