theleahfiles
5.7K posts

theleahfiles
@leahfiles
20 years in Intel | Corporate Intel CEO | Uncovering fraud and corruption | Making follow the $ cool | Deep Dives on Substack https://t.co/y9DqkhCcAB
Katılım Mart 2026
466 Takip Edilen109.8K Takipçiler

@leahfiles I see them doing the right thing and throwing the book at 'em, Danno!
🤞
English

A federal judge just ruled that Trump's $10B IRS lawsuit was fake: "not brought to vindicate rights; it was brought to manipulate the judicial process."
She voided the settlement, sanctioned the lawyers, and flagged Todd Blanche to the New York bar.
And her verdict on Blanche's sworn testimony to the Senate: "at best, misleading and, at worst, disingenuous."
Blanche's confirmation hearing to be Attorney General is in 24 hours. A judge caught him deceiving the Senate. Now the Senate votes on whether that's disqualifying or a job qualification.
Question for the Senate, are you going to allow this lying child pr*dator protector to walk all over you??
English

@leahfiles Bet they do, not one of them has a spine. They like all the rest are in the game only for self enrichment and to draw the favor of the billionwhore jewess. They are simply bought off cogs in a wheel

English

@leahfiles It was brought to manipulate? You don't say. This whole administration is a manipulation
English

He did! It’s what made me start looking into all of this in the first place because when a CEO asks for a review of finances and operations it’s typically bc they suspect fraud. That’s what they bring me in for. So, to honor Charlie’s legacy, since they conveniently cancelled it, I am doing it.
English

@leahfiles Amazing work Leah! These so called charities seem filled with manipulating grifters, it's insidious what they do. Opened 5 companies in 54 days?
Wasn't Charlie pushing for some kind of audit before his death, or did I imagine that?
English

Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time.
First up, Tyler Bowyer.
Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities.
Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like:
1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run....
2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do.
3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for.
4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides.
5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings.
6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity.
7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit.
The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design.
I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books.
Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you.
They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention.
Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?

English

@rccalhoun Omg the worst thing ever. In all honesty, our government gives away money and has no guardrails in place to prevent fraudulent programs. It’s absurd. They think it’s Monopoly money
English

@leahfiles PPP grants<<<<< 95% fraudulent per requirements 1 and 2 checked as affimative on application to get the $$$
English

@jinx00011 He blocked me long ago. But I have seen comments where I’m like, Bowyer, is that you 👀👀 lol
English

@leahfiles Here a fraud, there a fraud, everywhere a fraud fraud.
This is how they all succeed in life.
English

@leahfiles Gurrrl! I’m here for it! You did an amazing job! Well done!
English

@leahfiles @Mia_Stretch You are the best ! Thank you for these deep drives
English

@hunter_hunts2 CMMC II is different. It’s IT audit and very burdensome. The requirements they were putting on some of these contractors were insane and taking small businesses out of the game. So, I’m not a hater of this decision. I think it’s necessary. The financial piece is separate ;)
English

@leahfiles Can you please tell me this doesnt give free reign to cybersecurity contractors to “self asses” and not have to go thru an audit. and just say they won’t do bad stuff???!

English

@hlb6boudreaux There is no direct link in the 990s, but I have been investigating Brad Parscale and his connection and the link to Daily Wire and TPUSA. Ie why would Ben Shapiro be on the phone with CKs team….It’s coming tomorrow! And I think it will answer your question 🙏
English

@leahfiles I wonder if you could see if funds have moved between TPUSA and The Daily wire. Specifically right before and after Charlie’s murder.
English

I’ve been doing the analysis on their financials for months. But their latest filings came out a few weeks ago and it gives me insight into the year leading up to CK’s assassination. That combined with their behavior led me to uncover a lot of the things that they looked to be hiding. So, 6 months but it’s been a build up and now I have a pretty solid picture so, let’s go 💃🏻🥷
English

@leahfiles @Mia_Stretch Magnificent!!!! How long have you been working on this?
English

@leahfiles You are quite literally a Mensa machine! I'm in gob smacked awe of your jack hammering ability to uncover the truth out of sheer rock walls!
English

@JesterQueen7 @KirbyWilson This is great to know. I’d love to be able to have some good ones for people 🙏 thank you
English

@leahfiles @KirbyWilson There are two I donate to -
St. Jude & Make a Wish.
My nephew was a recipient of a Make a Wish, and they go above and beyond to make kids feel they’re on top of the world. ❤️
English





