leefal_lowes

@piangfa $TSLA goes up = buy $TSLA goes down = buy $TSLA trades side ways = buy Only exception is when (if) $TSLA goes down big like 20%+ this is a rare exception and requires a little calibration to the formula ≈ $TSLA trades down big = BUY FUCKLOADZ 😬 H2H

@Rozzah_2210 Andrew

Everyone got paused here 🤗 What is the man's name??

@ULTIMAHORAENX My colleagues were there awaiting to board another flight, which was subsequently delayed.

🇮🇹 ✈️ 🌀 HOMBRE SE LANZA A TURBINA DE AVIÓN EN ITALIA VIDEO VIRAL MUESTRA EL MOMENTO EXACTO DEL HORROR EN LA PISTA ⚠️¡SIGUE @ULTIMAHORAENX PARA MÁS! El 8 de julio de 2025 Andrea Russo de 35 años oriundo de Calcinate Italia burló la seguridad en el aeropuerto de Bérgamo Orio al Serio abandonó su Fiat 500 forzó una puerta de emergencia y corrió hacia un Airbus A319 de Volotea que taxiaba rumbo a Asturias con 154 pasajeros a bordo. Se lanzó deliberadamente al motor izquierdo y fue absorbido al instante muriendo en el acto frente a pasajeros y tripulación. El avión sufrió daños en la turbina y las operaciones del aeropuerto se suspendieron por casi dos horas. El video del suceso se viralizó hoy generando reacciones en redes. FUENTES: Grok, Anxious Vids, People, New York Post, Corriere della Sera.

@America_love786 Ans=40° assuming all horizontal lines are parallel.

Angle x

@Axel0__ Seeing as both “athletes” #240 & #282 are running at the same pace, the cyclist behind #282 is probably going quicker. Also, unless you can run sub-28 mins for 10KM - you’re not fast.

Who is the faster ??

@mth8547 -9 9-3=6 -3*6=-18 9+-18=-9

Can you tell the right answer?

@davidkurten Carbon capture and recycling is far more effective.

Building multi-billion £/$/€ Carbon Capture and Storage infrastructure is one of the most moronic ideas ever contemplated, when it already gets done for free by trees.

@EvEvangelist @energygovuk @DavidRoweWTL It’ll take a while to build it out. For those who want to help us move to a renewable-predominant grid, please join the industry.

@energygovuk @DavidRoweWTL Why have you not implemented BESS. Battery Energy Storage Systems ?

Sometimes there is too much wind for our outdated grid to handle, especially in Scotland and the East of England. Rather than paying wind farms to switch off we’re trialling a new system where people who live near these constrained areas get cheaper - or even free - electricity.

@emer_web3 None of those 🤣 Correct answer is 15

@ayeshavisk41781 Simplify and convert to decimal, then multiply by 100: •6/20 = 3/10 •3/10 = 0.3 •0.3*100 = 30% Short cut 3/10 = 3 tenths (30%)

Write as percentage...? Don't calculator...!!

@BenFoskett @afneil We massively overspend on nuclear deterrent. France and Israel, don’t seem to spend as much in that area.

The UK spend nearly twice as much on defence as Israel do. But looking at what it means in terms of defence capabilities, I feel we are so far behind. We have 180k active personnel (including reserves) and Israel has over 650k. Their air force is superior to the UK’s. Is it just a case of total mis-management?? I can’t get my head round it?!?

Happy to be corrected by naval experts. But by my calculations the entire Royal Navy surface fleet of warships consists of: Two aircraft carriers Six Type 45 destroyers Seven aging Type 23s And of these 15 warships only three are currently active (soon to be four if HMS Dragon leaves port tomorrow. In any sensible estimation of deployable capability we don’t really have a Navy, do we?

@EdwardJDavey I think you’re a confused Elon Musk admirer. He takes up a lot of your thought cycles, given your limited intellect.

Ed Miliband must step in and bar Tesla from holding an energy licence. Elon Musk is a threat to our national security and clearly not a fit person to operate in our energy industry. We can’t have the lights go out because he’s having a strop on X.

Richard Tice dreaming of North Sea riches to make Britain 'energy sovereign' is like choosing a charming but fading seaside B&B when you've got a massive wind-swept mansion next door with solar panels and a shiny new nuclear reactor in the basement. 🇬🇧⚡ If you're aspiring to lead a truly energy-independent powerhouse... picking geology that's more 'mature basin in gentle decline' than 'Saudi-level bonanza' might not be the smartest venue. We've got epic offshore wind, tidal potential, solar scaling up, and nuclear stepping up to baseload glory—that's the combo that could actually cut import reliance to near-zero and shield us from global gas price rollercoasters. North Sea? Nice buffer, sure—but let's not pretend it's the golden ticket to sovereignty when the real jackpot is blowing in from the North Sea winds themselves! 🌬️☀️⚛️ #CleanPower2030 #NuclearRenaissance #EnergySecurityViaRenewables" Factcheck: Fossil maximisation alone won't deliver full sovereignty given the UK's limited remaining reserves and the globalized nature of oil/gas markets. Even maximised North Sea output (e.g., OEUK's higher estimates of ~456 bcm recoverable gas, potentially covering multiples of annual demand if invested in heavily) only slows import dependence, not eliminates it—projections still show significant imports persisting through 2050. True long-term sovereignty comes from scaling renewables (offshore wind to 43–50 GW, onshore to 27–29 GW, solar to 45–47 GW by ~2030 under Clean Power plans) plus nuclear (up to 24 GW ambition by 2050 for firm low-carbon power), slashing fossil imports dramatically and building a resilient, homegrown system. The North Sea's role shifts more toward supporting the transition (e.g., infrastructure repurposing for CCUS/hydrogen) rather than being the primary savior.

@MbarkCherguia Is she a mother?

What’s the woman’s name? 😏

@KarolineGosling My PP t-shirt says Teslanaire 😉🤑

If you don't like Elon I don’t like you

In my own experience: Nurturing newborns (<1 yr, especially first 6 months). The nonstop soothing, feeding rhythm, deep bond—women for sure have a real biological + emotional edge there. After ~1 yr though, dads step up big time and become just as essential (play, guidance, different skill sets… and yeah, less "primary bag carrier/driver" 😂)

Let's see what's is the real answer?

Hmm, I’m not sure about your definition of athletic. I think actual athletic would look more like the skinny woman’s frame, just much more defined. I know it’s because hyrox and cross fit is now the definition of athletic, but IMO athletic is more like what a 1,500 m runner or pole jumper would look like. I suppose some amount of 100/200 m sprinter women would look like your “athletic” lady here. No hyrox lady is getting on the start line of a 5,000 m diamond league event and not getting lapped multiple times or finishing less than 2 hours behind a Ironman Pro athlete. Just my opinion, but I think elite runners, swimmers, triathletes look more athletic. Maybe not female pro cyclists, they generally look emaciated 🤣

Then the crybaby blocks you. 🤣 $TSLA FTW 🤑

1/ Agree: Over-regulation & endless approvals have crushed nuclear costs/timelines (Hinkley C classic example). Fixing that is essential for more deployment. 2/ On LCOE: Recent Lazard 2025, EIA/IEA data confirm unsubsidized new solar/wind (~$30-60/MWh) beats new nuclear (~$80-160+/MWh) in most Western markets—driven by real tech & scale drops, not just subsidies. 3/ Renewables often competitive subsidy-free in good locations now. “Net zero fees” making them artificially cheap doesn’t fully hold up anymore. 4/ But LCOE misses system costs: intermittency needs storage/grid/backup. Nuclear’s firm baseload value shines in high-renewables grids—some studies show it cuts total system cost for deep decarbonization. 5/ Decommissioning/waste? Already baked into nuclear LCOE (small % after 60+ yr discounting). Renewables’ end-of-life cheaper & shorter-lived, but not a game-changer skewing things. 6/ Bottom line: Renewables win on near-term new-build cost today. Still, we need a balanced zero-carbon mix—nuclear’s reliability, density & firm power deserve streamlined regs & fair support. No arbitrary winner-picking.

@leRaffl That’s true but not for the reasons you assume. Excessive regulation placed on nuclear and net zero surcharge makes it worse. Excessive subsidies for renewables make it cheaper. On level playing field, this reverses 180 degrees.

Nuclear sounds good in theory, and it used to be. But nowadays, building new ones is inferior to building solar and wind with storage.

Interesting you bring that up. The T-shirt slogan I’m wearing in my PP is “Teslanaire.” Teslanaire /ˈtɛz.lə.neə(r)/ noun (informal) Definition: An individual whose wealth has been substantially created or amplified through investment in Tesla, typically characterised by strong conviction in the company’s long-term vision and leadership. Extended meaning: More broadly, a person who has achieved significant financial gains by backing high-growth, disruptive technology companies early, often maintaining a long-term, high-conviction investment approach. Usage: “Early investors who held through volatility became Teslanaires.” Connotation: Carries undertones of high risk tolerance, patience, and alignment with innovation-led market disruption, often associated with supporters of Elon Musk. The reason I have an X subscription is because Tesla shares paid for my fuck off big 5-bed house with detached double garage. That’s why I support Elon, but thanks for asking. 😉

@leefal_lowes @Badboybonsai @Heccles94 I can see why you have to pay a racist to get attention.

Elon Musk does not work harder than a nurse. Yet, he has more money than every nurse on the planet combined. It's time to ban billionaires.