Lee Hoffman

4.3K posts

Lee Hoffman

Lee Hoffman

@leemhoffman

Cofounder/President - Runwise (formerly Cofounder - Veri / The Guest acq. The Knot)

New York, NY Katılım Eylül 2008
447 Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Lee Hoffman retweetledi
Trace Cohen
Trace Cohen@Trace_Cohen·
New York is about to make a $28.5B mistake #QSBS NY Senate Bill S8921 would tax startup gains that are tax-free federally and in most states. Retroactive to Jan 1, 2025. The data on what's at stake: 1. $28.5B in NYC VC investment in 2024 (2nd in the US) 2. $174.5B in startup exit value over 6 years 3. 809,000 ecosystem jobs, $291B in economic output 4. A founder with a $10M exit would owe $1.48M in new state/city tax 5. NY already lost $111B in AGI to interstate migration over the past decade 6. The feds just EXPANDED QSBS benefits. NY wants to eliminate them. 7. NJ just adopted QSBS conformity. NY would move against its own neighbor. I built a full research-backed analysis with interactive stress testing (not perfect but good enough to show the impact and make a point) valueaddvc.com/ny-qsbs
Trace Cohen tweet media
English
62
78
394
109.7K
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
Listening to @CathieDWood on @bankless I can’t help but think that the Mag-7 era is ending, and the Musk-4 era is just beginning - Tesla, SpaceX, Xai, Neurolink
English
0
0
0
126
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
A point of clarification on the mayoral election. I don’t believe that money can buy elections. @KamalaHarris outspent @realDonaldTrump massively and lost in a veritable landslide. That said, being able to fund a campaign is table stakes for running for office. When I wrote that there were hundreds of millions of dollars available to support a candidate for the mayoral election, I simply meant to suggest that fundraising was not going to be a barrier to entering the race, and the new candidate would therefore be able to spend the time to run a competitive campaign, meeting constituents rather than unproductive time fundraising. I didn’t intend to suggest that I or anyone in particular was going to write $100 million checks as some in the media have suggested. That approach is guaranteed to cause the new candidate to fail as the ‘he/she is trying to buy the election’ refrain will resonate. This is a very important election. The outcome will be determined by whomever is the best candidate, and the people will decide the outcome. I am prepared, along with many others, to make sure it is a competitive election so people understand who is running, what their policies are, and what the short- and long-term implications are for New York City.
Bill Ackman@BillAckman

I awoke this morning gravely concerned about New York City. I thought “What has NYC become that an avowed socialist who has supported defunding the police, whose solution to lowering food prices is city-owned supermarkets, who doesn’t understand that freezing rents will only reduce the supply of housing, who has no experience managing an organization -- let alone a city with a $100+ billion budget and a $2 trillion economy -- and who believes chants for ‘Globalizing the Intifada’ are acceptable, wins the Democratic Primary. After speaking to those who supported @ZohranKMamdani, I believe that he won the primary largely not due to his policies, but rather because he is a superb politician who ran a remarkable and inspiring campaign. He is intelligent and articulate. He is young and charming, and he successfully played down incriminating @X posts and statements from his past, pitching a joyful campaign of unity. And he won because the competition was very weak. His best competitor sat back and did not run a real campaign, relying on name recognition, early favorable polling and keeping a low profile to make it through. Not a strategy that I have ever seen work, but so be it. The Democratic primary voter is clearly tired of the Democratic politics of the past and its aging and over-the-hill leadership – Who isn’t? [As a case in point, how embarrassing is it to watch aging Dems fall in line with their tweets of support for Mamdani, as they desperately try to defend their seats from the far left?] And therefore, without any real competition, Zohran and his attractive personal qualities and campaign skills magically make him the candidate of the future. The problem, however, is that his policies would be disastrous for NYC. Socialism has no place in the economic capital of our country. The ability for NYC to offer services for the poor and needy, let alone the average New Yorker, is entirely dependent on NYC being a business-friendly environment and a place where wealthy residents are willing to spend 183 days and assume the associated tax burden. Unfortunately, both have already started making arrangements for the exits. Mamdani is right that much about NYC is broken. The City has gotten much less safe while the cost of living here has become increasingly unattainable for many. We pay more for less. Unfortunately, his headline campaign promises of frozen rents and cheaper food from city-owned markets, among others, are certain to fail. A mayor who disrespects the NYPD and has called for their defunding will get less effective policing, and Bratton’s ‘broken window theory’ will operate in reverse. A mayor who condones hate speech will incentivize more hate speech and violence. Words matter, and yes, they can inspire people to kill as we have recently tragically seen in our country and around the world. New York City under Mamdani is about to become much more dangerous and economically unviable. Unlike our Federal government, NYC cannot print money, and this Federal Government won’t bail NYC out if things go bad. In fact, Mamdani would be a windfall for the Republican Party as NY becomes another failed major city run by Democrats alongside Seattle, Chicago, LA, and SF et al as Senator Fetterman so eloquently stated today, "I'd describe it as Christmas in July for the GOP." So why did I become optimistic later this morning? The answer is that NYC has woken up in the last 24 hours. The substantial majority of NYC residents understand that socialism is a failed system, that rent freezes will destroy our housing base and shrink the affordable housing supply while killing new construction, and that an anti-capitalist Mayor will destroy jobs and cause businesses and wealthy taxpayers that have enabled NYC to balance the budget to move elsewhere. If 100 or so of the highest taxpayers in my industry chose to spend 183 days elsewhere, it could reduce NY state and city tax revenues by ~$5-10 billion or more, and that’s just my industry. Think Ken Griffin leaving Chicago for Miami on steroids. The good news is that there are other charismatic, intelligent, articulate, handsome, charming, young yet more experienced and, importantly, more centrist politicians who are New York residents eligible for office. There are also extremely talented members of the NY business community who could be superb mayors, Bloomberg being the reference standard from the past. And the setup is extremely attractive for a run for mayor. There are only 132 days until the election, which means the commitment of time to run is de minimis. This will be the most closely watched mayoral election in NYC in decades, perhaps ever, which, particularly in the social media and podcast era creates the opportunity for a new candidate to garner immediate name recognition, enormous media interest, and the visibility needed to get elected. Importantly, there are hundreds of million of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time raising funds. So, if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in. I am sure that Mike Bloomberg will share his how-to-win-the-mayoralty IP and deliver his entire election apparatus and system to the aspiring candidate so that the candidate can focus all of his or her energy on the campaign. One unfortunate fact, as far as I understand, is that the candidate will have to be a write-in as I believe that none of the current candidates established a nominating committee if they were to withdraw, which means that no one can take their spot on the ballot. This is such an important election, however, that I believe the write-in requirement could actually turn into an important call to action that brings people in throngs to the polls. It therefore won’t be the game stopper it would normally be in a typical election. As a result, the risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small, and the upside is enormous. If the candidate does not win, there is no harm, no foul, because the perceived probability of beating the Democratic nominee in a NYC mayoral election is extremely small. Therefore, there is no reputational risk to losing this election, and the corresponding reputational benefits are extraordinary whether one wins or loses. If the candidate wins, this is obviously a huge home run for the City and the candidate, but it is also an opportunity to save the Democratic Party from itself, grabbing the wheel just before the party goes even further off the cliff. The new mayor would be a national superhero for the City, for the Party, and for the country. For the aspiring politician, there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself than to run for mayor over the next 132 days. This election is already global front page news. For the aspiring young candidate, the amount of publicity and the massive followers to be gained are of incalculable long-term value whether they win or lose, and whatever they choose to do in the future, business, politics or otherwise. And there is a defensive reason for a politician to run. For the more centrist Democrat politician, a Mamdani win is very bad for your next election. As the Party veers further to the left, the Party’s backing for your future candidacy deteriorates substantially as Mamdani and AOC take control of the Party. In my experience, opportunities with minimal downside that don’t require huge investments of time while offering massive upside get filled. If you were ever thinking about running for office, or running for a higher office than you currently hold, this is likely the best opportunity that you are going to have. All of the above is not just theory, as I have a superb candidate who I believe can win who meets all of the criteria, but if I were to say his name or even reach out to him, it would have a negative effect on his candidacy, as I am a supporter of President Trump, and that alone taints anyone I would recommend for many and perhaps most NYC Democratic Party members. So rather than my making suggestions, I welcome yours. Who is your best centrist candidate who could go toe-to-toe with Mamdani on the campaign trail and on the debate stage? Let’s crowdsource the names and then do a poll. If someone is ready to raise their hand, I will take care of the fundraising. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the right candidate. More importantly, it is an opportunity to save our City and be a superhero. Life is short and you must dare to be great. The time is now.

English
599
458
5K
1M
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
@Hadley 1000%. Wish all investors saw it this way! We have taken a little liquidity at each round. In my experience the game of being successful in startups is very long, and the more base resources you have, the longer you can play it.
English
0
0
5
1.2K
Hadley Harris
Hadley Harris@Hadley·
Relatively uncommon POV: I encourage founders to take a little money off the table early — as early as Series A It’s not just good for them and their families. It’s good for the company too When a founder has some personal financial security, they are: -Less likely to feel pressure to take the first acquisition offer -More willing to make bold, long-term bets -Better aligned with us and our LPs on building something enduring Letting them de-risk just a little can unlock the mindset required to build a generational company
English
36
16
488
80.3K
Lee Hoffman retweetledi
Traded: Venture Capital
Traded: Venture Capital@TradedVC·
Runwise, a NYC-based smart operating system company for buildings, recently raised $55 million in Series B funding led by Menlo Ventures, with participation from MassMutual Ventures, Nuveen Real Estate, Multip...
English
0
6
6
900
StripMallGuy
StripMallGuy@realEstateTrent·
The worst part of moving to New York from California has been the weather. You look forward to warm days after months of endless freezing, and this is what you get in June.
StripMallGuy tweet mediaStripMallGuy tweet media
English
112
6
361
68.2K
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
@chadbyers Thanks Chad! Appreciate everything you and the team have done to help get us here 👊🏻❤️
English
0
0
1
55
Chad Byers 🦍
Chad Byers 🦍@chadbyers·
Congrats to Lee and the team at Runwise. It was an honor serving as a board observer for the first couple years. You're off the races and will become the operating system for commercial buildings -- all while reducing energy waste and saving building owners money.
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman

Big news for @wearerunwise: We’ve officially closed our Series B and a new round of growth debt to help us bring Runwise from 10,000 buildings to all 50,000,000. Thank you @axios and @alneuhauser for the write-up. bit.ly/3HOpoqU

English
1
2
18
5K
Lee Hoffman retweetledi
Menlo Ventures
Menlo Ventures@MenloVentures·
Today we welcome @wearerunwise to the Menlo portfolio! We’re proud to lead their $40M Series B— Runwise is modernizing building ops with AI-powered systems that cut energy use by up to 30%.—transforming operations that haven't changed in 60 years. Thrilled to back founders @leemhoffman, Jeff Carleton and the entire Runwise team. AI meets the built environment—one of the decade's most important frontiers. For more on why @Bad2theSloane was excited to lead this round: 🔗mnlo.vc/runwise
Menlo Ventures tweet media
English
2
2
11
1.2K
Lee Hoffman retweetledi
Kenny Burgos
Kenny Burgos@KennyBurgosNY·
Housing in NYC is difficult and expensive. Co-op’s are feeling the pinch just like all other building owners. But I’ve never seen a scenario where a co-op had to implement a special assessment fee ($) to cover unpaid rents from other tenants. This is a perfect example of how costs get shifted.
Kenny Burgos tweet media
English
6
7
23
2K
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
Business cards may be antiquated, but incredible design isn’t. The @wearerunwise design team continues to cook👩‍🍳🍳
Lee Hoffman tweet mediaLee Hoffman tweet media
English
0
0
0
108
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
Imagine 3 inches ruining a multi-hundred million dollar development. This high-rise apartment building in Lower Manhattan, called 1 Seaport, sits abandoned and unfinished. What happened? In short, the building is leaning about 3 inches at the top, and up to 10 inches on some floors depending on when you measure. All skyscrapers in lower Manhattan are built on pilings driven into the bedrock. But not 1 Seaport. Part of the lot, which the developer purchased as a parking lot for $64 million in 2013, was originally under the East River. Even as far back as the times of New Amsterdam, inhabitants of the city used infill to expand the island. We’ve filled the riverbeds with sand, dirt, and stone to make new lots on the rivers. The bedrock foundation for most skyscrapers sits 50 feet below the surface; but the bedrock at this site is about 150 feet below the ground. To build 1 Seaport into a 60-story highrise with 80 luxury condos, most of which would sell for several million dollars, the developers used a rare foundation construction method that involved injecting concrete into the ground to make it more solid. To date, the partially-constructed site sits abandoned, and has since been sold off for pennies on the dollar. The building likely can’t be inhabited without some very expensive fixes (if it can be fixed at all). 12 years after the original purchase of the lot for development, we’re as far as ever from people living there.
Lee Hoffman tweet media
English
0
0
0
159
Lee Hoffman
Lee Hoffman@leemhoffman·
@alexisohanian I know! Every single time I have to give up time with her to do something else, I literally think about how few the number of days are I will have with her while she is small and actually will want to spend time with me 😢
English
0
0
4
177
Alexis Ohanian 🗽
Alexis Ohanian 🗽@alexisohanian·
Bed time is easily one of my favorite times of the day as a dad, because it means "uppy" (carrying her upstairs and getting a looooong hug), we get to do prayers, we recap the day... and she's finally going to sleep 😆😅 so I get the rest of the night back to myself!
English
15
11
378
20.9K