Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Really happy to share my first first-author paper in Positive Psychology and emotion structures🎉 and curious for feedback #AcademicTwitter frontiersin.org/article/10.338…
GIF
English
Leopold Roth
272 posts
Leopold Roth
@leopold_roth
doctoral student at @univienna in (motivational) psychology, interested in fatigue, self-control and the mechanisms in between. also a bit of PosPsych & Methods
Wien, Österreich Katılım Aralık 2020
4.4K Takip Edilen705 Takipçiler
Leopold Roth retweetledi
PCI Psychology is a bold new effort seeking to improve peer review by separating it from journals and the publication process. Join us by signing up here: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…
English
Now also published @CollabraOA
online.ucpress.edu/collabra/artic…
Leopold Roth@leopold_roth
Happy to share that this project with @juja_jule and many more is now recommended as Stage 2 Registered Report on @PeerCommunityIn. You can find the peer-reviewed pre-print here (thread below): osf.io/preprints/psya…
English
@Leesplez From my lay perspective, model 2 looks exactly right. Model 1 would be the Fall back, if model 2 won’t converge.
English
Since "Time" is really just the main effect across all interventions (there's no control), that should be modeled as random slopes like Model 2, correct?
I don't know why but I can't shake the feeling I'm missing something. Any help is appreciated!
English
I need an #rstats sanity check for a #psychology study I'm running...just need to make sure I'm specifying the mixed-effects model correctly
All input is welcome, will explain in the next tweet...
English
@CollabraOA Also marking the second first author here: @juja_jule
English
Leopold Roth retweetledi
#RegisteredReport: Self-Control Beyond Inhibition—German Translation and Quality Assessment of the Self-Control Strategy Scale (SCSS), from @leopold_roth et al. doi.org/10.1525/collab…
English
@Jaylene_Patt @ECAllen I think today, pre-printing is a really good way of showing your work, while waiting on journals.
English
Leopold Roth retweetledi
New paper📜 in @JEnvPsych with @VeronikaJob and Christopher Mlynski at @Motiva_Vienna:
We show that people’s fundamental views of the world (= their lay beliefs about the world) influence their reaction to climate change (1/5)
doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv…
English
Leopold Roth retweetledi
Wenn man "Klimaschutz" hört, denkt man oft zuerst an Verzicht. Aber ist Klimaschutz wirklich nur eine Last oder kann er auch dazu führen, dass es uns besser geht? Darum geht es in meinem neuen Blogbeitrag bei In-Mind: de.in-mind.org/blog/post/last…
Deutsch
@JkayFlake @PeerCommunityIn For me neither, so far, they are actually much faster. But I think people still think of them as slow and hence the path needs more accountability on the journal side to provide clarity/safety. Especially for PhD projects.
English
@leopold_roth @PeerCommunityIn I'm not convinced RRs take longer than a regular paper, but def seeing you could end up in a situation where you are a good way into the process and just have to walk because the project has a deadline.
English
Reg Reports editors, how would you handle an RR that was in revision (pre IPA), but needed to be completed for a time sensitive project? Should the authors be able to resubmit the done project to the same journal as NOT an RR? Pack up and go somewhere else? How does this work?
English
@JkayFlake Yes, so far this seems to be one of the major hold-ups for people against RRs and with the scheduled review @PeerCommunityIn this worked for me quite good. But I also think not every journal has expertise and people to do it well.
English
@leopold_roth So you think the RR format should be able to get through the review process faster, just in general? Like 2-4 months to first decision (my estimate of business as usual) shouldn't be how RRs work?
English
@JkayFlake I would idealistically say that journals which need this long are not fit to offer Registered Reports. If they can not manage this within weeks, the format is not for them.
English
sorry if my question isn't clear, say it is 3-6 months to get another revision with hopes of an IPA, but the authors know they need to have results before then. What do you do? reject the paper and they just move on? Change the format? Curious on process for this situation.
English
@GivingTools @MatthewBJane @JonHaidt Doesn’t the BMJ publish living reviews? Maybe they would be open for this as well?
English
@MatthewBJane @JonHaidt This seems like the sort of nonstandard living research project that is hard to fit in a journal's "pdf prison". Nice.
English
@JkayFlake Thank you:) I will try it later, outside of the university wifi
English
@leopold_roth When I click on the link in the main tweet it loads this and the PDF button it clickable, right above the tiny orange text where it says "open access"
English
We wrote a short paper about our lessons learned doing registered reports. Check if out if you are interested to learn more about RRs and/or are considering getting started with RRs!
APA Journals@APA_Journals
A #RegisteredReport is a type of journal article in which the intro, methods, and analysis plan are proposed and peer-reviewed prior to execution—aiming to limit publication bias of significant results. Learn how to prepare your own: bit.ly/4gCpXRD @CPA_SCP @debra_titone
English
@JkayFlake Ah sorry! Then it’s probably my university account which makes everything difficult:) that’s very likely!
English
Leopold Roth retweetledi
🚨The International Climate Psychology Collaboration data paper is out in @ScientificData Thanks to the 258 collaborators involved, we collected climate psychology data from 63 countries in a sample of nearly 60k participants nature.com/articles/s4159…🧵
English
Leopold Roth retweetledi
We are conducting a short survey on the @socscipredict on the determinants of reproducibility and replicability. Your participation will greatly contribute to our understanding of which methods and fields have the highest reproducibility and replicability rates!
English
we also plan to send this to one of the @PeerCommunityIn friendly journals soon and will make another post about it then.
English
10) last, we would like to thank @giladfeldman who took his time to sit down with me and click through the @PeerCommunityIn homepage and explained the process of getting an Registered Report running with a lot of patience.
English
Happy to share that this project with @juja_jule and many more is now recommended as Stage 2 Registered Report on @PeerCommunityIn. You can find the peer-reviewed pre-print here (thread below): osf.io/preprints/psya…
GIF
Leopold Roth@leopold_roth
Very happy to share my first stage 1 acceptance through @PCI_RegReports. Also the most positive and engaging review process I experienced so far.
English