Lewis Jacobs

@Athersmike I wonder what criteria they will assess players against in these championship matches - quite tricky to quantify vibes and golfing ability in the county game

Should be the most intriguing start to the championship in years with so much in play and six rounds before first Test thetimes.com/sport/cricket/…

@BumbleCricket @WG_RumblePants Unfortunately the board want it to be an events organisation and the cricket is way way down their list of priorities, even voting against feels like struggling against a rising tide without change I feel sorry for Dame Sarah as it feels they are taking advantage of her lustre

Info for Lancashire members archive.ph/DKRS9

@LancsCCMG I was initially quite surprised at the number of proposals then less so when I read them and came to a similar conclusion. I think members who fully read the proposals will likely vote against them - I’m just not sure enough do read them or go beyond the board’s “recommendation”

It is very sad to see things come to this but we hope members will not support the Board's power grab at the SGM on 9 April.

ladd + keenan signed this for u like + repost to winnn

@WG_RumblePants Personally I’m shocked that vibes and golf don’t lead to elite level cricket performance. Who could possibly have predicted that?

Just a reminder that England no longer have a specialist fielding coach. I’m sure that the dropped catches are completely unrelated to that though…

rt to #probowlvote for cameron dicker

@JLM_1893 @chargers Fair. Just felt like a lot of really poor play calls and decisions tonight.

@lewtj1 @chargers Honesty our offense was better pre-Harbaugh, it was our defense that was worse

@chargers Surely Bolt would be better than those choices?

drop ur vote ⤵️

we’ve got a new furry friend help us name him !!

@lancscricket @liaml4893 Spot on today with bat and ball - hope the head’s not too sore!

Special. @liaml4893 🤩 ⚡️ #StrikeTogether

@LancsCCMG Sigh

No need for any heroics, barely a run a ball needed

@LancsCCMG 🤦‍♂️

@LancsCCMG Totally agree - Hartley and Livi bowled brilliantly in those middle overs

Decent effort in the field. Feels at least 20 short to me. Hold your nerve top order. Don't open the door.

@LancsCCMG Asking as my wife has just asked Lancs membership for the information to be able to understand the vote but apparently they don’t have it!

@LancsCCMG Another question - the club are clearly not going to provide any details on either the complaints that have led to the SGMs or their counter points, just scare people into voting against. How can members get this information if they aren’t on social media?

The Club's response to the SGM petition on the Chief Executive does not rebutt or address the criticisms made in the requisition. Read the petition here. docs.google.com/forms/d/1LNuRY…

@SLou1967 @LancsCCMG @theesk Indeed - I just got this text message from them - very dramatic wording to avoid accountability

@theesk @LancsCCMG The members seem very reasonable and restrained in their approach. Well done to those taking this on in a dignified , technical and responsible manner. The Board are behaving like rules do not apply to them. Everyone in power loves the idea of governance but few its operation .

Continuing my look at the management and governance issues at Lancashire County Cricket Club - details regarding the upcoming Special General Meeting @LancsCCMG theesk.org/2025/08/22/lan…

@LancsCCMG @gilliansingh Also would be good for members to see that skills matrix so that we can understand what the skills are of those representing and leading the club actually are. I’m an auditor and love a good process - would likely be quite illuminating to dig into the club’s ways of working

@LancsCCMG @gilliansingh I’m a bit confused by that video - it sounded like she is a member but didn’t go through a nomination process just applied like it’s a job. Maybe I’m missing something here.

Dear @gilliansingh You have recently followed this account. I've just watched your video. You confirmed that the Club has broken three Club rules around Nominations Committee (NomCo): 1. Not all member applicants were interviewed. 2. ⁠The Board consider that members should only be involved in appointing two directors - the roles currently occupied by Chris Peacock and yourself. 3. ⁠The member representative on NomCo is chosen (presumably by the Board) from the MRG membership rather than by the members. You will no doubt have read the email to members sent today. Are you happy for the member motion to be so blatantly misrepresented? Members want a NomCo that follows the rules and interviews any member applicant and then recommends for election to the Board any such member who is fit for the role given a fair objective assessment of their skills and capabilities. We have the SGM on this point because the Board has blocked a discussion and vote at two AGMs despite the motions having 240 members signing them. Further when a member tried to raise questions at the AGM he was shouted down by the then Chair. Has the Board investigated the multiple member complaints about the former Chair under its zero tolerance policy of bullying? Members are going to vote on one side of a story with the petitioning members having their views censored and misrepresented. Why won't the Board allow a fair and balanced discussion on the subject?