Lewis Jacobs

424 posts

Lewis Jacobs banner
Lewis Jacobs

Lewis Jacobs

@lewtj1

Learning to live my best life 👨‍👩‍👧🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛ 🐈‍⬛ Love sports, science and anything vaguely interesting Would like the country to start feeling gruntled again

United Kingdom Katılım Nisan 2011
76 Takip Edilen11 Takipçiler
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@Athersmike I wonder what criteria they will assess players against in these championship matches - quite tricky to quantify vibes and golfing ability in the county game
English
0
0
0
233
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@BumbleCricket @WG_RumblePants Unfortunately the board want it to be an events organisation and the cricket is way way down their list of priorities, even voting against feels like struggling against a rising tide without change I feel sorry for Dame Sarah as it feels they are taking advantage of her lustre
English
0
0
2
91
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG I was initially quite surprised at the number of proposals then less so when I read them and came to a similar conclusion. I think members who fully read the proposals will likely vote against them - I’m just not sure enough do read them or go beyond the board’s “recommendation”
English
1
0
1
426
Lewis Jacobs retweetledi
Los Angeles Chargers
Los Angeles Chargers@chargers·
ladd + keenan signed this for u like + repost to winnn
Los Angeles Chargers tweet media
English
154
4K
5.1K
117K
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@WG_RumblePants Personally I’m shocked that vibes and golf don’t lead to elite level cricket performance. Who could possibly have predicted that?
English
0
0
0
37
JM
JM@JLM_1893·
@lewtj1 @chargers Honesty our offense was better pre-Harbaugh, it was our defense that was worse
English
1
0
0
91
Los Angeles Chargers
Los Angeles Chargers@chargers·
we’ve got a new furry friend help us name him !!
Los Angeles Chargers tweet media
English
759
178
3.9K
218.1K
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG Totally agree - Hartley and Livi bowled brilliantly in those middle overs
English
1
0
0
108
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG Asking as my wife has just asked Lancs membership for the information to be able to understand the vote but apparently they don’t have it!
English
0
0
0
8
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG Another question - the club are clearly not going to provide any details on either the complaints that have led to the SGMs or their counter points, just scare people into voting against. How can members get this information if they aren’t on social media?
English
2
0
0
60
SarahLou1967
SarahLou1967@SLou1967·
@theesk @LancsCCMG The members seem very reasonable and restrained in their approach. Well done to those taking this on in a dignified , technical and responsible manner. The Board are behaving like rules do not apply to them. Everyone in power loves the idea of governance but few its operation .
English
1
2
8
1.2K
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG @gilliansingh Also would be good for members to see that skills matrix so that we can understand what the skills are of those representing and leading the club actually are. I’m an auditor and love a good process - would likely be quite illuminating to dig into the club’s ways of working
English
1
0
0
48
Lewis Jacobs
Lewis Jacobs@lewtj1·
@LancsCCMG @gilliansingh I’m a bit confused by that video - it sounded like she is a member but didn’t go through a nomination process just applied like it’s a job. Maybe I’m missing something here.
English
2
0
0
173
Lancashire County Cricket Members Group
Dear @gilliansingh You have recently followed this account. I've just watched your video. You confirmed that the Club has broken three Club rules around Nominations Committee (NomCo): 1. Not all member applicants were interviewed. 2. ⁠The Board consider that members should only be involved in appointing two directors - the roles currently occupied by Chris Peacock and yourself. 3. ⁠The member representative on NomCo is chosen (presumably by the Board) from the MRG membership rather than by the members. You will no doubt have read the email to members sent today. Are you happy for the member motion to be so blatantly misrepresented? Members want a NomCo that follows the rules and interviews any member applicant and then recommends for election to the Board any such member who is fit for the role given a fair objective assessment of their skills and capabilities. We have the SGM on this point because the Board has blocked a discussion and vote at two AGMs despite the motions having 240 members signing them. Further when a member tried to raise questions at the AGM he was shouted down by the then Chair. Has the Board investigated the multiple member complaints about the former Chair under its zero tolerance policy of bullying? Members are going to vote on one side of a story with the petitioning members having their views censored and misrepresented. Why won't the Board allow a fair and balanced discussion on the subject?
English
3
2
18
4K