The U.S. Navy Rail Gun itself debunks the Globe model.
Why? Because it locks onto targets from up to 100 nautical miles away with a line-of-sight laser before it calculates the angle of trajectory of its projectile.
If Earth is a ball 25k miles in circumference, then a ship 100 miles out should be swallowed by 6,666 feet of curvature.
This weapon is designed for a flat plane.
"Gravity" is the most successful single-word brainwashing spell ever cast by the deceivers in control of our world.
No "expert" can explain what gravity is or what causes it, and no matter how many dozens of miles up you go (clear videos exist of private rockets going up over 70 miles), the world never starts spinning away at 1,000 MPH. They always land right back in the same place they took off from.
This is because the Earth is not spinning. It is a stationary, flat plane, just as we observe and feel with our own senses.
There is no "gravity" holding the spinning ball atmosphere in place. The downward force pulling objects toward the Earth is based on density, buoyancy and electrostatics. That's it.
[🎥: @holisticnut33]
Exposing the tetanus hoax
- In the last decade 13 died from tetanus in the US.
- It's a vaccine that can be taken at the time of injury. Yet babies are given 5 shots.
- The risk is that 1 in 154 million will die from tetanus.
Another Big Pharma scam!
@GeeksGolfers@Bullcrapwork@PhilipRafferty5@thehealthb0t personal information and the people involved can't be real. This is a no win situation. You people have already made up your mind, and the only purpose showing raw data serves for you is to go track down these people and harass them.
@GeeksGolfers@Bullcrapwork@PhilipRafferty5@thehealthb0t The names being blacked out is pointless, because you wouldn't know what to do with the raw data. More conniving antivaxers would just use the redacted raw data to either falsly represent what it shows or call it fake because it's been manipulated by redacting
@GeeksGolfers@Bullcrapwork@PhilipRafferty5@thehealthb0t This whole discussion about how the open journals publish papers without peer review and how unhappy you are with that implies you advocate for peer review, but only to serve the current point.
@GeeksGolfers@Bullcrapwork@PhilipRafferty5@thehealthb0t You: These publications aren't peer reviewed, so they're bullshit!
Also you: Peer review is bullshit!
There is no standard unto which will satisfy your dogshit criteria of "Vaccines bad cause I just feel that they are!" rhetoric.