Linda Moore

I love how women are slowly phasing out the “bra”. No one knows their bra size anymore, we’re all wearing sports bras, bralettes or going braless and it’s amazing.

In 2014, while Hamas terrorists fired thousands of rockets at Jewish civilians, including kindergartens, Shabana Mahmood, the current UK Home Secretary, stood on stage and openly supported them. She called the rocket-firing Gazans “her brothers and sisters.” She didn’t condemn the Islamic terrorism or call for peace. Instead, she outlined a strategic plan: use Muslims who had immigrated to the West (like her own parents) as an economic weapon against Israel by organizing boycotts of Jewish-made products to financially weaken the Jewish state. She bragged publicly about being part of a riot squad that shut down London stores for five hours until they removed Jewish-made products from Israel. This was never about justice. It was about partnering with genocidal terrorists to help Hamas slaughter more Jews. Shabana Mahmood actively worked to advance Hamas’s genocidal agenda so Muslim terrorists could annihilate Israel and its Jewish population. Today, this same woman is the UK Home Secretary, responsible for the safety of British Jews. Let that sink in. The Muslim woman who sided with Hamas against Israel and plotted to weaken it economically is now in charge of protecting Jewish communities in Britain. This is not just absurd. This is dangerous.

The Permanent State vs. The People Most people still do not see it. They believe that changing the party in power will change the country's direction. They are wrong. The disease runs deeper than any government. The machinery of the state, the judiciary, the police, the civil service, education, local government, the media, the NGO sector, has been captured by an unelected, unaccountable class that shares a single worldview. Progressive, globalist and hostile to anyone who challenges it. Artikur Rahman, a Home Office civil servant overseeing Rwanda deportations while standing as a Green Party candidate and under investigation for social media posts laughing at the October 7 massacre, is not an aberration. He is the system made visible. This is why justice is two tier. Why protests are policed according to the politics of the participants rather than the law. Why children are taught ideology instead of knowledge. Why councils obsess over diversity targets while public services collapse. Why the Prevent referral of Essa Suleiman was closed in 2020 and two Jewish men were stabbed on Golders Green Road in 2026. Elections do not touch this machine. Ministers come and go. Prime Ministers rise and fall. The permanent state remains, enforcing its ideology regardless of who you vote for. That is why Blairism has survived every government since Blair. It is hardwired into the institutions. Mass immigration has been the permanent state's most consequential project. Sustained under every government since 1997 and justified by skills shortages and cultural enrichment, it has served three purposes that its architects understood and its defenders still deny. First, to reshape the electorate. Importing millions from cultures that lean toward collectivism and state dependency builds a voting base inclined toward bigger government, more welfare and identity politics. The electoral arithmetic of 2024 reflects twenty five years of that project paying out. Second, to erode national cohesion. A fractured population split by language, religion and culture is less likely to unite against those in power. Mass immigration keeps the focus on competing groups rather than on the people directing the competition. Third, to embed diversity as permanent justification for controlling speech and thought. Once the demographic transformation is sufficiently advanced the state can impose speech codes, hate laws and censorship under the guise of protecting minorities. That is not a conspiracy theory. It is the operational logic of every hate speech law passed in the last twenty years. The result is the Britain Danny Kruger described. A civil service that has become a state within a state. Where a Home Office official can laugh at a terrorist massacre of Jews, stand for a party that wants to abolish borders and remain in post while under investigation, and where the whistleblower is treated as the extremist while Rahman keeps his job. Breaking this will require something most parties lack and most voters have not yet demanded. Root and branch reform. Dismantling quangos. Defunding activist NGOs. Purging DEI bureaucracies. Reclaiming our schools and universities. Rebuilding the police and judiciary from the ground up. It will take years of relentless unpopular work and political will that does not yet exist in sufficient quantity anywhere in British public life. The Rahman story is useful precisely because it makes the abstract concrete. This is not a theory about institutional capture. It is a named civil servant, a named department, a named political party and a named act of contempt for the victims of a terrorist massacre. The permanent state has a face this week. It is worth looking at carefully.

'Brent Couriers Limited' was paid £781k by Harrow, £719k by Hounslow and £555k by Enfield last year; £2.1m in total. Its registered office is shown below. 🧵 3/5